Design has been described as a conversation: with the problem that is being addressed, with materials and artifacts, with our colleagues and ourselves. The language of this conversation is made up of words and images, actions and behaviors. Focusing on the role of gesture in design collaboration, we ran two studies to explore how embodied telepresence robots, or physical avatars, can support better communication in distributed teams. The studies drew upon crowdsourced study participants to provide their impressions of: (1) the meaning of individual gestures, and (2) the social roles of design team partners. Distant collaborators were better understood when their telepresence intermediaries portrayed relevant gestures in concert with their facial expressions. When the avatars displayed such physical motions, teammates on both sides of the interaction were perceived as more involved in the conversation, more composed in demeanor, and more equal in stature. Our next step is to apply these requirements to the design of our next generation of field-robust communication avatar.
- Facial Expression
- Local Teammate
- Local Participant
- Physical Avatar
- Remote Collaborator
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Hall, E. (1959) The silent language. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Argyle, M. (1988) Bodily communication. London, England: Methuen.
Sirkin, D. (2010) Physicality in distributed design collaboration: How embodiment and gesture can re-establish rapport and support better design. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel and L. Leifer (Eds.) Design thinking: Understand, improve, apply, 165–178. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Clark, H. (2003) Pointing and placing. In S. Kita (Ed.) Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet, 243–268. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Howe, J. (2006) The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine 14(6).
Kittur, A. and Kraut, R. (2008) Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in Wikipedia: Quality through coordination. Proceedings of the 26 th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, 37–46.
Ross, J., Irani, L., Silberman, M., Zaldivar, A. and Tomlinson, B. (2010) Who are the crowdworkers?: Shifting demographics in Mechanical Turk. Extended Abstracts of the 28 th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, 2863–2872.
Kittur, A., Chi, E. and Suh, B. (2008) Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. Proceedings of the 26 th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, 453–456.
Dow, S., Glassco, A., Kass, J., Schwarz, M., Schwartz, D. and Klemmer, S. (2010) Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy. In ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 17(4), ACM Press, 1–24.
Feng, D., Besana, S. and Zajac, R. (2009) Acquiring high quality non-expert knowledge from on-demand workforce. Proceedings on the 2009 Workshop on the People’s Web Meets NLP, ACL and AFNLP, 51–56.
Downs, J., Holbrook, M., Sheng, S. and Cranor, L. (2010) Are your participants gaming the system? Proceedings of the 28 th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, 2399–2402.
Gaver, B., Dunne, T. and Pacenti, E. (1999) Design: Cultural probes. Interactions 6(1), 21–29.
Ju, W. and Takayama, L. (2009) Approachability: How people interpret automatic door movement as gesture. International Journal of Design 3(2), 77–86.
Kidd, C. (2003) Sociable robots: The role of presence and task in human robot interaction. Master’s Thesis, MIT.
Woods, S., Walters, M., Koay, K. and Dautenhahn, K. (2006) Methodological issues in HRI: A comparison of live and video-based methods in robot to human approach and direction trials. Proceedings of the 15 th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, IEEE Press, 51–58.
Dillard, J., Solomon, D. and Palmer, M. Structuring the concept of relational communication. Communication Monographs 66, 49–65.
Coan, J. and Gottman, J. (2007) The specific affect (SPAFF) coding system. In J. Coan and J. Allen (Eds.) Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment, 106–123. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
The authors would like to thank the Hasso Plattner Institute—Stanford Design Thinking Research Program for funding this project; Professors Mark Cutkosky and Larry Leifer for supervising the research; and collaborators Eric Kent for co-designing and constructing robot avatars and contributing to the content of the studies; Rebecca Currano for contributing to the content of the video prototypes and studies; and Samson Phan for guiding the design and safety of our robot avatars.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sirkin, D., Ju, W., Cutkosky, M. (2012). Communicating Meaning and Role in Distributed Design Collaboration: How Crowdsourced Users Help Inform the Design of Telepresence Robotics. In: Plattner, H., Meinel, C., Leifer, L. (eds) Design Thinking Research. Understanding Innovation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21643-5_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21642-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21643-5