Advertisement

Exploratory Case Study Research on SOA Investment Decision Processes in Austria

  • Lukas Auer
  • Eugene Belov
  • Natalia Kryvinska
  • Christine Strauss
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6741)

Abstract

Aligning information systems to financial key performance indicators and measure its returns has become one of the most important topics over the last years. However, despite the growing investments of many corporations into IT in general, an increasing number of questions and concerns have been arising to the effectiveness of these investments and their payoffs. Hence, an evaluation of an enterprise’s IT architecture, as a part of IT investments, has been increasing its role throughout organizations worldwide. Numerous conceptual studies and tools to predict the business value of IT/SOA investment portfolios are being offered; nevertheless most of them substantially lack accuracy. For this purpose, we empirically investigate the application of SOA investment criteria in large Austrian corporations, which will be realized through a multiple case study collection reflecting current investment strategies and measurements.

Keywords

Business Value IT Empirical Study Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) 

References

  1. 1.
    Thomas, O., vom Brocke, J.: A value-driven approach to the design of service-oriented information systems - making use of conceptual models. Information Systems and e-Business Management (ISeB) 8(1), 67–97 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stewart, W., Coulson, S., Wilson, R.: Information Technology: When is it Worth the Investment? Communications of the IIMA 7(3), 119–122 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Papazoglou, M.P., Traverso, P., Dustdar, S., Leymann, F.: Service-Oriented Computing: a Research Roadmap. Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst. 17(2), 223–255 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Willcocks, L.: Evaluating Information Technology investments: research findings and reappraisal. Information Systems Journal 2, 243–268 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grembergen, W.: Information Technology Evaluation Methods and Management. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success – A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4), 9–30 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lagerstrom, R., Ohrstrom, J.: A Framework for Assessing Business Value of Service Oriented Architectures. In: Services Computing, IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, pp. 670–671 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beimborn, D., Joachim, N., Weitzel, T.: Drivers and Inhibitors of SOA Business Value: Conceptualizing a Research Model. In: AMCIS 2008 Proceedings, Toronto (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Viering, G., Legner, C., Ahlemann, F.: The (Lacking) Business Perspective on SOA - Critical Themes in SOA Research. Wirtschaftsinformatik 1, 45–54 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Becker, A., Buxmann, P., Widjaja, T.: Value Potential and Challenges of Service-Oriented Architectures - A User and Vendor Perspective. In: Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems, Verona (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dewan, S., Shi, C., Gurbaxani, V.: Investigating the risk-return relationship of information technology investment: firm-level empirical analysis. Management Science 53(12), 1829–1842 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yoon, T., Carter, P.: Investigating the Antecedents and Benefits of SOA Implementation: A Multi-Case Study Approach. In: AMCIS Proceedings (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beimborn, D., Joachim, N., Münstermann, B.: Impact of Service-oriented Architectures (SOA) on Business Process Standardization - Proposing a Research Model. In: Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Verona (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Starke, G., Tilkov, S.: SOA Expertenwissen – Methoden, Konzepte und Praxis serviceorientierter Architekturen (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schryen, G.: Preserving knowledge on IS business value: what literature reviews have done. In: Business & Information Systems Engineering (BISE), vol. 52(4), pp. 225–237 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Glaser, B., Strauss, A.: The discovery of grounded theory. de Gruyter, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yin, R.: Case Study Research: Design & Methods, Thousand Oaks (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kauffman, R.J., Weill, P.: An evaluative framework for research on the performance effects of information technology investment. In: Proc. 10th International Conference on Information Systems, Boston (1989)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M.: Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Frisk, E.: Categorization and overview of IT perspectives – A literature review. In: Proc. of the European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nijland, M.: Understanding the Use of IT Evaluation Methods in Organizations, London School of Economics, PhD Dissertation (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lin, C., Pervan, G.: The practice of IS/IT benefits management in large Australian organizations. Inf. Manage. 41(1), 13–24 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ross, J., Weill, P.: Six IT decisions your IT people shouldn’t make. Harvard Business Review 80(11), 5–11 (2002)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brynjolfsson, E.: The productivity paradox of information technology. Commun. ACM 36(12), 66–77 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lukas Auer
    • 1
  • Eugene Belov
    • 2
  • Natalia Kryvinska
    • 1
  • Christine Strauss
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.FH Wien University of Applied Science of WKWViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations