Advertisement

Service Systems and Value Modeling from an Appreciative System Perspective

  • Gil Regev
  • Olivier Hayard
  • Alain Wegmann
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 82)

Abstract

Since its inception Service Science has created a substantial body of knowledge about services and their provision. Most notably, the concept of Service System was defined in order to describe the co-creation of value by the service provider and customer. We introduce the concept of Appreciative System defined by Vickers in the study of the way individuals and organizations apprehend and act on their environment. We show how the appreciative system concept can be applied to a service system model with the SEAM enterprise architecture method.

Keywords

Service System Enterprise Architecture Requirement Engineer Soft System Methodology Viable System Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barile, S., Polese, F.: Smart Service Systems and Viable Service Systems: Applying Systems Theory to Service Science. Service Science 2(1/2) (2010); Services Science GlobalGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barile, S., Spohrer, J., Polese, F.: System Thinking for Service Research Advances. Service Science 2(1/2) (2010); Services Science GlobalGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Checkland, P., Scholes, J.: Soft System Methodology in action. Wiley, Chichester (1990)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Checkland, P.: Webs of significance: the work of Geoffrey Vickers. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 22(4) (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Kinderen, S., Gordijn, J.: e3 service: A model-based approach for generating needs-driven e-service bundles in a networked enterprise. In: Proc. 16th European Conference on Information Systems (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gordijn, J., Akkermans, J.M.: Value-based requirements engineering: exploring innovative e-commerce ideas. Requirement Engineering 8(2), 114–134 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    IT Governance Institute: Enterprise Value: Governance of IT Investments, The Val IT Framework 2.0.ITGI, Rolling Meadows, IL (2008) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maglio, P.P., Vargo, S.L., Caswell, N., Spohrer, J.: The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Information Systems and E-Business Management 7(4), 395–406 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Modselling Value Propositions in E-Business. In: Proc. Second International Conference on Entertainment Computing (ICEC), Pittsburgh, PA (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business Model Generation (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Regev, G., Wegmann, A.: Where do Goals Come From: the Underlying Principles of Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering. In: Proc. 13th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2005), Paris (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Regev, G., Gause, D.C., Wegmann, A.: Creativity and the Age-Old Resistance to Change Problem in RE. In: Proc. 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2006), Minneapolis, MN (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Regev, G., Hayard, O., Gause, D.C., Wegmann, A.: Toward a service management quality model. In: Glinz, M., Heymans, P. (eds.) REFSQ 2009 Amsterdam. LNCS, vol. 5512, pp. 16–21. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vargo, S.L., Maglio, P.P., Akaka, M.A.: On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal 26(3), 145–152 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vickers, S.G.: Value Systems and Social Process. Tavistock, London (1968)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vickers, S.G.: Policymaking, Communication, and Social Learning. Transaction Books, New Brunswick (1987)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Von Bertalanffy, L.: General System Theory. George Braziller, New York (1968)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wegmann, A.: On the Systemic Enterprise Architecture Methodology (SEAM). In: International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS), Angers, France (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wegmann, A., Regev, G., Rychkova, I., Julia, P., Perroud, O.: Early Requirements and Business-IT Alignment with SEAM for Business. In: 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, New Delhi, India (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weick, K.E.: The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1979)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weinberg, G.M.: An Introduction to General Systems Thinking. Wiley & Sons, New York (1975)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weinberg, G.M., Weinberg, D.: General Principles of Systems Design. Dorset House, New York (1988)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gil Regev
    • 1
    • 2
  • Olivier Hayard
    • 2
  • Alain Wegmann
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer and Communication SciencesEcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)LausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.ItecorVevey 1Switzerland

Personalised recommendations