Neurolaw and UNESCO Bioethics Declarations



This paper presents an analysis of the bioethics Declarations agreed by all member countries of UNESCO with reference to neurosciences. The texts, the 1997 Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights, and the 2005 Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, provide a number of useful points for countries considering policy for use of knowledge of neurosciences, and in the education of society of the issues that arise from our increased understanding of neurosciences.


  1. Macer DRJ (1994) Bioethics for the people by the people. Eubios Ethics Institute, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  2. Macer DRJ (1998) Bioethics is love of life. Eubios Ethics Institute, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  3. Macer DRJ (2002a) The next challenge is to map the human mind. Nature 420:12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Macer DRJ (2002b) Finite or infinite mind?: a proposal for an integrative mental mapping project. Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth 12:203–206Google Scholar
  5. Rundle M, Conley C (2007) Ethical implications of emerging technologies: a survey. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  6. UNESCO (1997) Universal declaration on the human genome and human rightsGoogle Scholar
  7. UNESCO (2005) Universal declaration on bioethics and human rightsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social and Human Sciences for Asia and the Pacific, RUSHSAPUNESCO BangkokBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations