Abstract
In recent years, a vast literature has developed on how neuroimaging may increase our understanding of deception, moral and legal responsibility, behaviour prediction, and much more. Common approaches overlook the global reality of neuroscience and neurotechniques. This is the reason why (beyond controversial implications of neuroimaging techniques: i.e. lie detection, determination of mental impairment, or psychopathy) it is important to survey some technological applications of neuroscience on the human body (even beyond the field of criminal law), such as objective measurement of chronic pain, robots and artificial intelligence, brain–computer interfaces. The review focuses on Italian case law on the concept of “moral damage” and the opportunities that neurotechniques offer in order to have a more objective evaluation. In addition, it is considered the responsibility for robot’s actions (especially referring to learning robots) and the possible application of current Italian civil legislation (especially the responsibility of teachers). Conclusive remarks are on the law and the way basic concepts as human individual are affected by neuroscience.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Glannon (2007).
- 2.
To survey the actual and current, and likely use of neuroscientific, behavioural genetic and neurogenomic techniques before the European Courts and in investigative activities and to create and implement an archive of cases and materials on NeuroLaw are among the aims of the newborn European Association for Neuroscience and Law (EANL). More information at http://www.unipv-lawtech.eu/.
- 3.
- 4.
In this paragraph, I take advantage of Camporesi and Bottalico (2011). I thank the authors for kindly giving me the opportunity to use the results of their research.
- 5.
Tracey and Bushnell (2009).
- 6.
Pain intensity scales used by researchers at the NIH Clinical Center to measure how intensely individuals are feeling pain and to monitor the effectiveness of treatments are at: http://painconsortium.nih.gov/pain_scales/index.html.
- 7.
When a case is very controversial or precedents are conflicting each other, the Italian Corte di Cassazione (Supreme Court) decides as a unique chamber (Sezioni Unite): several judges are added to a chamber and a bigger chamber is created ad hoc with the purpose to have a more authoritative and binding decision.
- 8.
Decreto Legislativo n. 209, 7 September 2005 (mainly art. 138).
- 9.
- 10.
Goldacre (2010).
- 11.
Kolber (2007).
- 12.
Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Martin, Supreme Court of Canada, October 3, 2003. See also http://onlinedb.lancasterhouse.com/index.asp?navid=37&sid=2792&layid=87&csid1=23&csid2=3467.
- 13.
City of Philadelphia v. Shapiro, 206 A.2d 308, 311 (Pa. 1965).
- 14.
See also, Madeira (2006–2007).
- 15.
See for example the website http://www.thermographyclinic.ca/pain.html.
- 16.
Turing (1950). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy outlines Alan Turing’s very controversial biography and his contribution to contemporary philosophy as follows: Alan Turing (1912–1954) never described himself as a philosopher, but his 1950 paper ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’ is one of the most frequently cited in modern philosophical literature. It gave a fresh approach to the traditional mind-body problem, by relating it to the mathematical concept of computability he himself had introduced in his 1936–7 paper ‘On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem.’ His work can be regarded as the foundation of computer science and of the artificial intelligence program.. […]Alan Turing's arrest in February 1952 for his sexual affair with a young Manchester man, and he was obliged, to escape imprisonment, to undergo the injection of oestrogen intended to negate his sexual drive. He was disqualified from continuing secret cryptological work. His general libertarian attitude was enhanced rather than suppressed by the criminal trial, and his intellectual individuality also remained as lively as ever. (in: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/turing/, accessed 7 Jan 2011).
- 17.
Turing (1950), pp. 433–434.
- 18.
Floridi (1999).
- 19.
Thomas Hobbes deals with automata in the first lines of the Introduction of his book Leviathan: T. Hobbes, Leviathan, 1651.
- 20.
In this paragraph I take advantage from a research in progress at the European Centre for Law, Science and New Technologies, University of Pavia (I). I am deeply in debt with Chiara Boscarato (Scholarship Fellow at the Centre) and thank her for giving me the opportunity to use her paper (draft) Boscarato (2011).
- 21.
The word “robot” was used for the first time by Karel Čapek, a Czech writer, in his play Rossum’s Universal Robots, published in 1920, on the advice of his brother Josef who had previously used the word “automa” in his short story “Opilec” published in 1917 (http://capek.misto.cz/english/robot.html).
- 22.
Consumer protection is regulated by EC Directive 1985/374, as amended by EC Directive 1999/34.
- 23.
- 24.
According to Italian legislation Art. 2052 of the Civil Code should be applied: “The owner of an animal or anyone using it for a certain period is liable for damage caused by the animal, whether the animal was in his custody, had disappeared or had fled, unless he can prove that a fortuitous event occurred”.
- 25.
- 26.
Production was discontinued on 2006 because of insufficient sales and high production costs (around 2.500 dollars).
- 27.
http://www.robotcub.org/. This is an open source project funded by the European Commission and used by more than 20 laboratories worldwide.
- 28.
Article 2048 Italian Civil Code: Il padre e la madre, o il tutore, sono responsabili del danno cagionato dal fatto illecito dei figli minori non emancipati o delle persone soggette alla tutela, che abitano con essi. La stessa disposizione si applica all'affiliante. I precettori e coloro che insegnano un mestiere o un'arte sono responsabili del danno cagionato dal fatto illecito dei loro allievi e apprendisti nel tempo in cui sono sotto la loro vigilanza. Le persone indicate dai commi precedenti sono liberate dalla responsabilità soltanto se provano di non avere potuto impedire il fatto.
- 29.
This was developed by the French company Aldebaran Robotics http://www.aldebaran-robotics.com/eng/Nao.php.
- 30.
Robocup is an international robotics competition founded in 1997. The aim is to develop autonomous soccer robots with the intention of promoting research and education in the field of artificial intelligence. The name RoboCup is a contraction of the competition’s full name, “Robot Soccer World Cup”, but there are many other stages of the competition such as “Search and Rescue” and “Robot Dancing”. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RoboCup.
- 31.
Anderson and Anderson (2010).
- 32.
Floridi (2008), p. 95.
- 33.
Amedeo et al. (2007).
- 34.
Parfit (1984).
- 35.
This is the conclusion we reached in Santosuosso and Bottalico (2009), Art. 46.
References
Amedeo S, Valentina S, Pavone IR (2007) Drawing the boundary lines of humans: in whose Bailiwick? In: Derecho y Religiòn, vol. II, pp 11–36
Anderson M, Anderson SL (2010) Robot be good: a call for ethical autonomous machines. Scientific American, October 2010
Borsook D, Moulton EA, Schmidt KF et al (2007) Neuroimaging revolutionizes therapeutic approaches to chronic pain. Mol Pain 3:25
Borsook D, Sava S, Becerra L (2010) The pain imaging revolution: advancing pain into the 21st century. Neuroscientist 16(2):171–85
Boscarato (2011) Who is responsible for robot’s actions? An initial examination of Italian law within a European perspective, paper submitted to “TILTing Perspectives 2011 – Technologies on the stand: Legal and ethical questions in neuroscience and robotics” Tilburg University, The Netherlands, April 2011
Camporesi and Bottalico (2011) Can we finally ‘see’ pain? Brain imaging techniques and implication for the law. J Conscious Stud (Forthcoming)
Floridi L (1999) Philosophy and computing. An introduction. Routledge, London, pp 132–216
Floridi L (ed) (2008) Philosophy of computing and information. 5 Questions. Automatic Press/VIP, Copenhagen, p 95
Glannon W (2007) Defining right and wrong in brain science. Essential readings in neuroethics, Dana Foundation Series on Neuroethics. Dana Press, New York
Goldacre B (2010) Lost your libido? Let’s try a little neuro-realism, madam. The Guardian, Saturday 30 October, 2010. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/oct/30/ben-goldacre-bad-science-neuroscience. Accessed October 30 2010
Kolber AJ (2007) Pain detection and the privacy of subjective experience. American Journal of Law & Medicine 33:433–456
Madeira JL (2006–2007) Regarding pained sympathy and sympathy pains: reason, morality, and empathy in the civil adjudication of pain. S C L Rev 58:415
Nordmann A (Rapporteur) (2004) Converging technologies – shaping the future of European societies, Report 2004, reperibile in: http://ec.europa.eu/research/conferences/2004/ntw/pdf/final_report_en.pdf
Parfit D (1984) Reasons and persons. Clarendon, Oxford
Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2002) Converging technologies for improving human performance. Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science (National Science Foundation/DOC-sponsored report), June 2002, Arlington, Virginia
Santosuosso A, Bottalico B (2009) Neuroscience,accountability and individual boundaries. In: Front Hum Neurosci 3:45
Tracey I, Bushnell C (2009) How neuroimaging studies have challenged us to rethink: is chronic pain a disease? J Pain 10(11):1113–20
Turing AM (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59(236):433–460
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Santosuosso, A. (2012). Neuroscience and Converging Technologies in Italy: From Free Will Approach to Humans as Not Disconnected Entities . In: Spranger, T. (eds) International Neurolaw. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21541-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21541-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21540-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21541-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)