Playbook: Revision Control and Comparison for Interactive Mockups

  • Stephen Oney
  • John Barton
  • Brad Myers
  • Tessa Lau
  • Jeffrey Nichols
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6654)

Abstract

When designing interactive interfaces and behaviors, interface designers compare and contrast multiple design ideas, often creating and testing many intermediate user interface prototypes before deciding on a final design. However, existing interface prototyping and creation tools do not effectively let designers explore, compare, or keep track of older versions of interface mockups, implicitly making the assumption that the users of these tools will work with one design alternative at a time. To explore how to enable designers to work with multiple designs in a prototyping tool, we created Playbook, a new system oriented towards helping interface designers keep track of, compare, and create interactive mockups. In this paper, we describe Playbook and discuss ways that future prototyping tools can better support the workflow of designers.

Keywords

prototyping mockups interface design versioning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ozenc, F.K., Kim, M., Zimmerman, J., Oney, S., Myers, B.: How to support designers in getting hold of the immaterial material of software. In: ACM CHI Conf., pp. 2513–2522 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grigoreanu, V., Fernandez, R., Inkpen, K., Robertson, G.: What designers want: Needs of interactive application designers. In: IEEE VL/HCC, pp. 139–146 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Newman, M.W., Landay, J.A.: Sitemaps, storyboards, and specifications: a sketch of Web site design practice. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (DIS), pp. 263–274 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carter, A., Hundhausen, C.: How is User Interface Prototyping Really Done in Practice? A Survey of User Interface Designers. In: IEEE VL/HCC, pp. 207–211 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leshed, G., Haber, E.M., Matthews, T., Lau, T.: CoScripter: automating & sharing how-to knowledge in the enterprise. In: ACM CHI Conf., pp. 1719–1728 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin, J., Thomsen, M., Landay, J.: A visual language for sketching large and complex interactive designs. In: ACM CHI Conf., pp. 307–314 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klemmer, S.R., Newman, M.W., Farrell, R., Bilezikjian, M., Landay, J.A.: The designers’ outpost: a tangible interface for collaborative web site. In: ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST), pp. 1–10 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hudson, S., John, B., Knudsen, K., Byrne, M.: A tool for creating predictive performance models from user interface demonstrations. In: ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST), pp. 93–102 (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hartmann, B., Yu, L., Allison, A., Yang, Y., Klemmer, S.R.: Design as exploration: creating interface alternatives through parallel authoring and runtime tuning. In: ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST), pp. 91–100 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Oney
    • 1
  • John Barton
    • 2
  • Brad Myers
    • 1
  • Tessa Lau
    • 2
  • Jeffrey Nichols
    • 2
  1. 1.Carnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghU.S.
  2. 2.IBM Almaden Research CenterSan JoseU.S.

Personalised recommendations