Advertisement

A.N. Prior’s Notion of the Present

  • David Jakobsen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6789)

Abstract

This paper presents a fresh look at A.N. Prior’s Notion of The Present (1970), in order to cast light on the article through Prior’s own notes from the Bodleian library. This will be done in order to evaluate two critiques of Prior’s notion of the present: That is self-contradictory (see [17]), and that it is unable to account for change (see [6]). This article will argue that a revisit to Prior’s notes will provide clarity at places where confusion gives ground to criticism of Prior’s definition as self-contradictory. The notes will also underline how radical Prior’s notion of the present is, and that he was aware of it. They thus help us to see more clearly what Prior actually meant by saying that the present is the real considered in relation to two realms of unreality, namely the past and the future.

Keywords

Ontology A.N. Prior Time and existence Tense-logic Presentism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bourne, C.: A Future for Presentism. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Butterfield, J.: Prior’s Conception of Time. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, pp. 193–209 (1983-1984)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Craig, W.L.: Is Presentness a Property? American Philosophical Quarterly (1), 27–40 (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Craig, W.L.: The Tensed Theory of Time: A Critical Examination. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Le Poidevin, R.: Change, Cause, and Contradiction: A Defence of the Tenseless Theory of Time. Macmillan, London (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lewis, D.: On the Plurality of Worlds. Blackwell, Oxford (1986)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Merricks, T.: Truth and Ontology. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oaklander, L.N.: Presentism, Ontology and Temporal Experience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Prior, A.N.: Time and Modality. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1957)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prior, A.N.: Formal Logic. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1962)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prior, A.N.: Past, Present and Future. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1967)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prior, A.N.: The Notion of The Present. Studium Generale (23), 245–248 (1970)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prior, A.N.: Notes to The Notion of the Present. The Prior Collection, Bodleian Library, Box 7, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith, Q.: The Infinite Regress of Temporal Attributions. The Southern Journal of Philosophy (3), 383–396 (1986)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith, Q.: Language and Time. Oxford University Press, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith, Q.: The ’Sentence-Type Version’ of the Tenseless Theory of Time. Synthese (3), 233–251 (1999)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith, Q.: Time and Degrees of Existence: A Theory of ’Degree Presentism’. In: Callender, C. (ed.) Time, Reality and Experience, pp. 119–136. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tooley, M.: Time, Tense and Causation. Oxford University Press, USA (1997)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zimmerman, D.: Temporary Intrinsics and Presentism. In: Zimmerman, D., van Inwagen, P. (eds.) Metaphysics: The Big Questions, pp. 206–220. Basil Blackwell, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zimmerman, W.D., Loux, J.M.: Introduction. In: Zimmerman, W.D., Loux, J.M. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, pp. 1–7. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Jakobsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Communication and PsychologyAalborg UniversityAalborg EastDenmark

Personalised recommendations