Advertisement

Opcode-Sequence-Based Semi-supervised Unknown Malware Detection

  • Igor Santos
  • Borja Sanz
  • Carlos Laorden
  • Felix Brezo
  • Pablo G. Bringas
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6694)

Abstract

Malware is any computer software potentially harmful to both computers and networks. The amount of malware is growing every year and poses a serious global security threat. Signature-based detection is the most extended method in commercial antivirus software, however, it consistently fails to detect new malware. Supervised machine learning has been adopted to solve this issue, but the usefulness of supervised learning is far to be complete because it requires a high amount of malicious executables and benign software to be identified and labelled previously. In this paper, we propose a new method of malware detection that adopts a well-known semi-supervised learning approach to detect unknown malware. This method is based on examining the frequencies of the appearance of opcode sequences to build a semi-supervised machine-learning classifier using a set of labelled (either malware or legitimate software) and unlabelled instances. We performed an empirical validation demonstrating that the labelling efforts are lower than when supervised learning is used while the system maintains high accuracy rate.

Keywords

malware detection learning machine learning semi-supervised learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ollmann, G.: The evolution of commercial malware development kits and colour-by-numbers custom malware. Computer Fraud & Security 2008(9), 4–7 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lanzi, A., Balzarotti, D., Kruegel, C., Christodorescu, M., Kirda, E.: AccessMiner: using system-centric models for malware protection. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 399–412. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schultz, M., Eskin, E., Zadok, F., Stolfo, S.: Data mining methods for detection of new malicious executables. In: Proceedings of the 22n d IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 38–49 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kolter, J., Maloof, M.: Learning to detect malicious executables in the wild. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 470–478. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhou, Y., Inge, W.: Malware detection using adaptive data compression. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on Workshop on AISec, pp. 53–60. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Santos, I., Penya, Y., Devesa, J., Bringas, P.: N-Grams-based file signatures for malware detection. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS), vol. AIDSS, pp. 317–320 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Santos, I., Brezo, F., Nieves, J., Penya, Y.K., Sanz, B., Laorden, C., Bringas, P.G.: Opcode-sequence-based malware detection. In: Massacci, F., Wallach, D., Zannone, N. (eds.) ESSoS 2010. LNCS, vol. 5965, pp. 35–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Christodorescu, M.: Behavior-based malware detection. PhD thesis (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Perdisci, R., Gu, G., Lee, W.: Using an ensemble of one-class svm classifiers to harden payload-based anomaly detection systems. In: Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 488–498. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chapelle, O., Schölkopf, B., Zien, A.: Semi-supervised learning. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhou, D., Bousquet, O., Lal, T., Weston, J., Schölkopf, B.: Learning with local and global consistency. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 16, pp. 595–602 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McGill, M.J., Salton, G.: Introduction to modern information retrieval. McGraw-Hill, New York (1983)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garner, S.: Weka: The Waikato environment for knowledge analysis. In: Proceedings of the New Zealand Computer Science Research Students Conference, pp. 57–64 (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singh, Y., Kaur, A., Malhotra, R.: Comparative analysis of regression and machine learning methods for predicting fault proneness models. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology 35(2), 183–193 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kang, M., Poosankam, P., Yin, H.: Renovo: A hidden code extractor for packed executables. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Workshop on Recurring Malcode, pp. 46–53 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Royal, P., Halpin, M., Dagon, D., Edmonds, R., Lee, W.: Polyunpack: Automating the hidden-code extraction of unpack-executing malware. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC), pp. 289–300 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Martignoni, L., Christodorescu, M., Jha, S.: Omniunpack: Fast, generic, and safe unpacking of malware. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC), pp. 431–441 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sharif, M., Yegneswaran, V., Saidi, H., Porras, P.A., Lee, W.: Eureka: A framework for enabling static malware analysis. In: Jajodia, S., Lopez, J. (eds.) ESORICS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5283, pp. 481–500. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Igor Santos
    • 1
  • Borja Sanz
    • 1
  • Carlos Laorden
    • 1
  • Felix Brezo
    • 1
  • Pablo G. Bringas
    • 1
  1. 1.S3Lab, DeustoTech - Computing, Deusto Institute of TechnologyUniversity of DeustoBilbaoSpain

Personalised recommendations