Skip to main content

The Impact of Accessibility on the Value of Offices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Transitions Towards Sustainable Mobility

Abstract

Accessibility is becoming an increasingly important issue in the Netherlands, not only for policymakers but also for daily workers on the road and employers, who have to deal with a growing uncertainty of their staff being on time. Not only the access via roads is important; but also the unreliability of public transport (as experienced by passengers), and the lack of parking areas in many places contribute to the importance of accessibility in society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Rosen (1974) is probably the first to publish this theory in an economically fully developed manner and, therefore, can be taken as a good starting point for the interested reader.

  2. 2.

    Good, but somewhat technical, papers on the latest situation in hedonic price modeling can be found in, for example, Palmquist (2003) en Bajari and Benkard (2005).

  3. 3.

    This specification was suggested by the simulation results of Goudappel-Coffeng (see www.bereikbaarheidskaart.nl).

  4. 4.

    This is mainly due to the specific log-sum approach used to measure accessibility by road. This makes a direct interpretation difficult.

  5. 5.

    Land use is defined here as the percentage of a particular land use type in a four-digit postcode area. They are based on a grid size of 25 by 25 m.

References

  • Bajari P, Benkard CL (2005) Demand estimation with heterogeneous consumers and unobserved product characteristics: a hedonic approach. J Polit Econ 113:1239–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout PHG, Hop JP (2002) Een prijskaartje aan kwaliteitskenmerken van kantoren. In opdracht van DTZ Zadelhoff en Twynstra Gudde. Amsterdam: Stichting voor Economisch Onderzoek der Universiteit van Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos I (2005) Knooppuntontwikkeling en bereikbaarheid: state of the art. Working paper, Nijmegen, Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R, Duncan M (2001) Rail transit’s value added: effect of proximity to light and commuter rail transit on commercial land values in Santa Clara county California. Paper prepared for National Association of Realtors Urban Land Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R, Duncan M (2001–2002a) Land value impact of rail transit services in Los Angeles County. Report prepared for National Association of Realtors Urban Land Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R, Duncan M (2001–2002b) Land value impact of rail transit services in San Diego County. Report prepared for National Association of Realtors Urban Land Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Damm D, Lerman SR, Lerner-Lam E, Young J (1980) Response of urban real estate values in anticipation of the Washington metro. J Transp Econ Policy 14:315–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Debrezion Andom G (2006) Railway impacts on real estate prices. Thela Thesis, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Fejarang RA (1994) Impact on property values: a study of the Los Angeles metro rail. Preprint prepared for Transportation Research Board 73rd annual meeting, Washington, DC, 9–13 Jan 1994

    Google Scholar 

  • Geurs KT, Ritsema van Eck JR (2001) Accessibility measure: review and applications. Evaluation of accessibility impacts on land-use transport scenarios, and related social and economic impacts. RIVM Report 408505006. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey & Baker (1996) European real estate monitor. Healey & Baker, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickling Lewis Brod (2002) Commercial property benefits of transit: final report. Federal Transit Administration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen A, Hanemaayer D (1991) Eisen aan de bedrijfsomgeving in de Randstad, NSS Beleidsonderzoek & Beleidsadvies, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis J, Cervero R, Guhathukurta S, Loutzenheiser D, Zhang M (1995) Rail transit investments, real estate values, and land use change: a comparative analysis of five California rail transit systems. Monograph 48, Institute of Urban and Regional Studies, University of California at Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpezzi S (2002) Hedonic pricing models: a selective and applied review. The Center for Urban Land Economics Research, the University of Wisconsin, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson AC (1998) Transit stations and commercial property values: case study with policy and land use implications. Paper presented at Transportation Research Board 77th annual meeting, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmquist RB (2005) Property value models. In: Karl-Göran M, Jefferey V (eds) Handbook of environmental economics, vol II, Valuing environmental changes. Elsevier North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 763–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellenbarg PH (1985) Bedrijfsrelokatie en ruimtelijke kognitie; onderzoekingen naar bedrijfsverplaatsingsprocessen en de subjektieve waardering van vestigingsplaatsen door ondernemers in Nederland. Dissertation R.U. Groningen, Sociaal-Geografische Reeks no. 33, Geografisch Instituut R.U. Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Quackenbush KH, Holst-Roness E, Humphrey TJ, Slater G (1987) Red line extension to alewife: before/after study – appendices. Central Transportation Planning Staff for the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietveld P, Bruinsma F (1998) Is transport infrastructure effective? transport infrastructure and accessibility impacts on the space economy. In: Advances in spatial science. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen S (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J Polit Econ 82:34–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloterdijk MS, van Steen PJM (1994) Ruimtegebruik en ruimtelijk gedrag van ondernemingen: economisch-demografische bouwstenen. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Faculteit der Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser P, van Dam F (2006) De Prijs van de Plek. NAi uitgevers, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger R (2001) Light rail proximity: benefit or detriment. The case of Santa Clara County California. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 80th annual meeting, Washington, DC, 7–11 Jan 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein BL, Clower TL (1999) The initial economic impact of the DART LRT system. Unpublished manuscript

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ghebreegziabiher Debrezion .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A

Appendix A

The estimation of the Rail Service Quality Index (RSQI) of a station is based on the doubly constrained spatial interaction model, given as follows:

$$ {T_{{ij}}} = {A_i}{O_i}{B_j}{D_j}f(GJ{T_{{ij}}})g(GJ{T_{{ij}}}/{d_{{ij}}})\exp ({\xi_{{ij}}}) $$
(A1)
$$ {O_i} = \sum\nolimits_j {{T_{{ij}}}} $$
(A2)
$$ {D_j} = \sum\limits_i {{T_{{ij}}}} $$
(A3)

where \( {T_{{ij}}} \) is the number of trips between stations \( i \) and \( j \); \( {O_i} \) is the total number of trips originated in station \( i \); \( {D_j} \) is the total number of trips attracted by station \( j \). \( {A_i} \) and \( {B_j} \) are the balancing factors which ensure that the constraints on origins and destinations (given by [2] and [3A3]) are met; \( GJ{T_{{ij}}} \) is the generalized journey time between origin station \( i \) and destination station \( j \); \( {d_{{ij}}} \) is the Euclidian distance between origin station \( i \)and destination station \( j \); and \( {\xi_{{ij}}} \) is the error component of the model which follows an independently and identically normal distribution. We specify the functions \( f \) and \( g \) as follows:

$$ f(GJ{T_{{ij}}}) = \exp \left(\sum\limits_{{c = 1}}^C {{\beta_c}DGJ{T_c}^{{ij}}}\right)$$
(A4)
$$ g(GJ{T_{{ij}}}/{d_{{ij}}}) = {\left( {GJ{T_{{ij}}}/{d_{{ij}}}} \right)^{\gamma }} $$
(A5)

where, \( DGJ{T_c}^{{ij}} \) is a dummy variable, which is equal to 1, if \( GJ{T_{{ij}}} \) falls in the generalized journey time category \( c \)and 0 otherwise. Thus, the doubly constrained gravity model we estimated is given by:

$$ {T_{{ij}}} = {A_i}{O_i}{B_j}{D_j}\exp \left( {\sum\limits_{{c = 1}}^C {{\beta_c}DGJ{T_c}^{{ij}}} } \right){\left( {GJ{T_{{ij}}}/{d_{{ij}}}} \right)^{\gamma }}\exp ({\xi_{{ij}}}) $$
(A6)

This equation can be linearized by taking the natural logarithm of both sides:

$$ \ln \left( {{T_{{ij}}}/{O_i}{D_j}} \right) = \ln {A_i} + \ln {B_j} + \left( {\sum\limits_{{c = 1}}^C {{\beta_c}DGJ{T_c}^{{ij}}} } \right) + \gamma \ln \left( {GJ{T_{{ij}}}/{d_{{ij}}}} \right) + {\xi_{{ij}}} $$
(A7)

The coefficient of the generalized journey time categories, the ratio of generalized journey time, and the balancing factors will be estimated from the above equation. Thus, in the estimation, the logs of the balancing factors in the equation represent the coefficients to be estimated. This requires that the logs of the balancing factors are multiplied by the dummy variable for the corresponding station. Therefore, the equation for the estimation is given as:

$$ \ln \left( {\frac{{{T_{{ij}}}}}{{{O_i}{D_j}}}} \right) = \sum\limits_{{\tilde{i} = 1}}^N {\ln {A_{{\tilde{i}}}}{S_{{\tilde{i}}}}} + \sum\limits_{{\tilde{j} = 1}}^{{N - 1}} {\ln {B_{{\tilde{j}}}}{S_{{\tilde{j}}}}} + \ln \left( {\sum\limits_{{c = 1}}^C {{\beta_c}DGJ{T_c}^{{ij}}} } \right) + \gamma \ln \left( {\frac{{GJ{T_{{ij}}}}}{{{d_{{ij}}}}}} \right) + {\xi_{{ij}}}. $$
(A8)

where, \( N \) is the number of railway stations in the railway network; and \( {S_{{\tilde{i}}}} \) and \( {S_{{\tilde{j}}}} \) are dummy variables for departure station \( \tilde{i} \) and destination station \( \tilde{j} \). They assume the value 1 when \( i = \tilde{i} \) and \( j = \tilde{j} \), respectively, and 0 otherwise. Given the assumption on the error components above, (8) can be estimated using ordinary least squares (OLS). The estimated coefficients are then used in determining the Rail Service Quality Indices (RSQIs) for each station. The RSQI of any departure station \( i \) is determined as the aggregation sum of the quality measures over all the destination stations (\( j \)’s). Thus, the RSQI of a given departure station is given by:

$$ RSQ{I_i} = \sum\limits_j {{{\hat{B}}_j}{D_j}\hat{f}(GJ{T_{{ij}}})\hat{f}(\frac{{GJ{T_{{ij}}}}}{{{d_{{ij}}}}})} = \sum\limits_j {{{\hat{B}}_j}{D_j}\exp \left( {\sum\limits_{{c = 1}}^C {{{\hat{\beta }}_c}DGJ{T_c}^{{ij}}} } \right){{\left( {\frac{{GJ{T_{{ij}}}}}{{{d_{{ij}}}}}} \right)}^{{\hat{\gamma }}}}}; $$
(A9)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Debrezion, G., de Graaff, T., Rietveld, P. (2011). The Impact of Accessibility on the Value of Offices. In: van Nunen, J., Huijbregts, P., Rietveld, P. (eds) Transitions Towards Sustainable Mobility. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21192-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21192-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21191-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21192-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics