Abstract
Currently it is accepted to distinguish among lymphoproliferative diseases the groupings of lymphomas, leukoses and lymphomas/leukoses (Gantsev 2004). Malignant neoplasms originating from the elements of lymph nodes or extranodal lymphatic tissue are qualified as lymphomas, while leukoses are tumors from peripheric blood cells, and the group of lymphomas-leukoses consists of diseases with both signs. Neoplasms of plasma cells, including myelomatosis and plasmocytoma, are not presently qualified as lymphomas.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsSuggested Readings
Gantsev ShH, Ruchkin VN, Frolov VY et al (2002) Cancer and geological formations. Bashkir Health, Ufa, p 48
Garin AM, Khlebnikov A, Habagari DS (1992) Handbook of anticancer therapy. Moscow (in Russian)
References
Aboizied MM, Crawford ES, Nabi HA (2005) 18F-FDG imaging pitfalls and artifacts. Nucl Med Technol 33:145–155
Barnngton SF, O’Doherty MJ (2003) Limitations of PET for imaging lymphoma. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:117–127
Beal KP, Yeung HW, Yahalom J (2005) FDG-PET scanning for detection and staging of extranodal marginal zone lymphomas of the MALT type: a report of 42 cases. Ann Oncol 16:473–480
Blum RH, Seymour JF, Wirth A et al (2003) Freguent impact of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on the staging and management of patients with indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Clin Lymphoma 4:43–49
Buchmann I, Reinhardt M, Elsner K et al (2001) 2-(Fluorine-18) fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the detection and staging of malignant lymphoma. Cancer 91:889–899
Carr R, Barrington SF, Madan B et al (1998) Detection of lymphoma in bone marrow by whole-body positron emission tomography. Blood 91:3340–3346
Elstrom R, Guan L, Baker G et al (2003) Utility of FDG-PET scanning in lymphoma by WHO classification. Blood 101:3875–3876
Fnedberg JW, Fischman A, Neuberg D et al (2004) FDG-PET is superior to gallium scintigraphy in staging and more sensitive in the follow up of patients with de novo Hodgkin lymphoma a blinded comparison. Leuk Lymphoma 45:85–92
Fuster D, Chiang S, Andreadis C et al (2006) Can [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging complement biopsy results from the iliac crest for the detection of bone marrow involvement in patients with malignant lymphoma? Nucl Med Common 27:11–15
Gambhir SS, Czernin J, Schwimmer J et al (2001) A tabulated summery of the FDG-PET literature. J Nucl Med 42:1S–93S
Gantsev ShH (2004) Oncology: a textbook for medical students. Moscow, (in Russian)
Gershanovich ML, Borisov VI, Sidorenko YS et al (1995) Current possibilities and perspectives of drug therapy in oncology. Vopr Onkol 41(2):116–124 (in Russian)
Isasi CR, Blaufox MD (2005) A metaanalysis of 18F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the staging and restaging of patients with lymphoma. Cancer 104:1066–1074
Jerusalem G, Beguin Y (2002) Does positron emission tomography have a role in routine clinical practice in patients with Hodgkin’s disease? Clin Lymphoma 3:125–126
Jerusalem G, Warland V, Najjar F et al (1999) Whole-body 18F-FDG-PET for the evaluation of patients with Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Nucl Med Commun 20:13–30
Jerusalem G, Hustinx R, Begum Y, Fillet G (2005a) Evalution of therapy for lymphoma. Semin Nucl Med 35:186–196
Jerusalem G, Hustinx R, Begum Y, Fillet G (2005b) Positron emission tomography imaging for lymphoma. Curr Opin Oncol 17:441–445
Juweid ME, Wiseman GA, Vose JM et al (2005) Response assessment of aggressive non Hodgkin’s lymphoma by integrated International Workshop criteria and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Med Oncol 23:4652–4661
Kostakoglu L, Coleman M, Leonard JP et al (2002) PET predicts prognosis after 1 cycle of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma and Hodgkin’s disease. J Nucl Med 43:1018–1027
Mikhael NG, Timothy AR, Odoherty MJ et al (2000) 18 FDG-PET as a prognostic indicator in the treatment of aggressive non Hodgkin’s lymphoma – comparison with CT. Leuk Lymphoma 39:543–553
Mikhael NG, Hutchings M, Fields PA et al (2005) FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Oncol 16:1514–1523
Moog F, Bangetter M, Diedrichs CG et al (1997) Lymphoma: role of whole-body 2-deoxy-2-[F18] fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) PET in nodal staging. Radiology 203:795–800
Moog F, Kotzerke J, Reske N (1999) FDG-PET can replace bone scintigraphy in primary staging of malignant lymphoma. J Nucl Med 40:1407–1410
Naumann R, Beuthien-Baumann B, Reiss A et al (2004) Substantial impact of FDG-PET imaging on the therapy decision in patients with Hodgkin’s disease. Ann Oncol 90:620–625
Pakos EE, Fotopoulos AD, Ioannidis JP (2005) 18F-FDG-PET for evaluation of bone marrow infiltration in staging of lymphoma: a meta analysis. J Nucl Med 46:958–963
Panizo C, Perez Salazar M, Bendandi M et al (2004) Positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for the evaluation of residual Hodgkin’s disease mediastinal masses. Leuk Lymphoma 45:1829–1833
Partridge S, Timothy A, O’Doherty MJ et al (2000) 2-Fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D glucose positron emission tomography in the pretreatment staging of Hodgkin’s disease: influence on patient management in a single institution. Ann Oncol 11:1273–1279
Rigacci L, Castagnoli A, Dim C et al (2005) 18FDG-positron emission tomography in post treatment evaluation of residual mass in Hodgkin’s lymphoma long-term results. Oncol Rep 14:1209–1214
Schiepers C, Filmont JE, Czernin J (2003) PET for staging of Hodgkin’s disease and non Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:82–88
Schoder H, Noy A, Gonen M et al (2005) Intensity of 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography distinguishes between indolent and aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 23:4643–4651
Talbot JN, Haioun C, Rain JD et al (2001) [18F]-FDG positron imaging in clinical management of lymphoma patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 38:193–221
Tonzuka T, Nakamura F, Kanno T et al (2004) Early therapy monitoring with FDG PET in aggressive non Hodgkin’s lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31:22–28
Vazhenin AV, Voronin MI, Vaganov NV et al (2003) Radiodiagnosis and radiotherapy: a textbook for medical students, residents and interns. Moscow (in Russian)
Vinnicombe SJ, Rezneck RH (2003) Computerised tomography in the staging of Hodgkin’s disease and non Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:42–55
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Granov, A., Tiutin, L., Schwarz, T. (2013). Lymphoproliferative Diseases. In: Granov, A., Tiutin, L., Schwarz, T. (eds) Positron Emission Tomography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21120-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21120-1_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21119-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21120-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)