Skip to main content

Do Capital Requirements Affect Long-Run Output Trends?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emergent Results of Artificial Economics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 652))

Abstract

The macroeconomic implications of capital requirement for banks have drawn remarkable attention after the financial crisis started in 2007. In particular, a considerable effort has been devoted by the scientific community and by the central banks in order to understand the effects of different capital requirements on long term growth. This paper aims to contribute to the debate, proposing an analysis based on an agent-based macroeconomic model, i.e., the Eurace model, that takes into account the complex pattern of interactions among different economic agents in a realistic and complete way. The institutional setting considered in the computational experiment consists in varying the allowed leverage ratio for commercial banks, i.e. the ratio between the value of the loan portfolio held by banks, weighted with a measure of the loan riskiness, and the banks net worth or equity, along the lines of capital adequacy ratios set by the Basel II agreement. The outcomes of the analysis show that bank’s capital requirement affects both the level of output and the output variability. In particular, limiting bank leverage by means of stricter capital requirements has a negative impact on output in short term that fades if the medium term and disappears in a long run scenario characterized by higher GDP levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Admati, A. R., DeMarzo, P. M., Hellwig, M. F., Pfleiderer, P., Sep. 2010. Fallacies, irrelevant facts, and myths in the discussion of capital regulation: Why bank equity is not expensive. Working paper series of the max planck institute for research on collective goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adrian, T., Shin, H. S., July 2010. Liquidity and leverage. Journal of Financial Intermediation 19 (3), 418–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berger, A. N., Herring, R. J., Szego, G. P., June 1995. The role of capital in financial institutions. Journal of Banking &; Finance 19 (3-4), 393–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blum, J., Hellwig, M., April 1995. The macroeconomic implications of capital adequacy requirements for banks. European Economic Review 39 (3-4), 739–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cincotti, S., Raberto, M., Teglio, A., 2010. Credit money and macroeconomic instability in the agent-based model and simulator Eurace. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 4 (26), http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2010-26.

  6. Dawid, H., Gemkow, S., Harting, P., Neugart, M., 2009. Spatial skill heterogeneity and growth: an agent-based policy ananlysis. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 12 (4).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dawid, H., Neugart, M., Wersching, K., Kabus, K., Harting, P., Gemkow, S., april 2007. Eurace Working Paper 7.1: Capital, Consumption Goods and Labor Markets in Eurace. Tech. rep., Bielefeld University.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hellwig, M., Jul. 2010. Capital regulation after the crisis: Business as usual? Working paper series of the max planck institute for research on collective goods, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Myers, S., Majluf, N., June 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics 13 (2), 187–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Teglio, A., Raberto, M., Cincotti, S., 2010a. Balance sheet approach to agent-based computational economics: the EURACE project. Vol. 77 of Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing. Springer Verlag, pp. 603–610.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Teglio, A., Raberto, M., Cincotti, S., 2010b. Endogeneous credit dynamics as source of business cycles in the Eurace model. Vol. 645 of Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer Verlag, pp. 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Teglio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Teglio, A., Raberto, M., Cincotti, S. (2011). Do Capital Requirements Affect Long-Run Output Trends?. In: Osinga, S., Hofstede, G., Verwaart, T. (eds) Emergent Results of Artificial Economics. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 652. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21108-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21108-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21107-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21108-9

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics