Advertisement

Miscanthus

  • Kossonou Guillaume Anzoua
  • Toshihiko Yamada
  • Robert J. HenryEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The genus Miscanthus was first described in 1855 by Andersson (Öfvers Kungl Vet Adad Förh Stockholm 12:151–168, 1856). Its members are typical tall C4 grasses belonging to the Poaceae family, showing close relationships with the species in the Andropogoneae tribe. The genus is naturally distributed in eastern and southeastern Asia. Certain species have been introduced into Europe and northern America where they have received widespread attention for their ornamental value. Traditionally the genus has attractive features for domestic use as a livestock feed, green manure, and as roof material for traditional homes (Koyama, Grasses of Japan and Its Neighboring Regions: An Identification Manual. Kodansha, Tokyo, Japan, 1987) and more recently as a genetic source for sugarcane breeding. Although it has had a long tradition of use, its recent evaluation as a biomass feedstock for bioenergy production has given the genus industrial attention. The use of Miscanthus, a non-food crop, as an energy crop avoids food security risks associated with many other potential energy crops. Most research and commercial production have used a triploid sterile hybrid, Miscanthus × giganteus, which is thought to be a spontaneous hybrid between M. sinensis and M. sacchariflorus. The use of M. × giganteus may avoid the significant problem of invasive weediness associated with other Micsanthus species. Miscanthus taxonomy has largely been examined in order to broaden the genetic resources available, but it is complex and confusing so that it is often subjected to modifications and discussed inconclusively. Between 14 and 20 species of Miscanthus have been recognized, among which Miscanthus sinensis, Miscanthus sacchariflorus, and their hybrid Miscanthus × giganteus are distinguished. The present chapter reviews the role of Miscanthus on the environment and its wealth that is genetically poorly characterized.

Keywords

Amplify Fragment Length Polymorphism Marker Energy Crop Sterile Hybrid Triploid Hybrid Ornamental Garden 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adati S (1958) Studies on the Miscanthus genus with special reference to the Japanese suitable for breeding purposes as fodders crops. Bulletin of the faculty of Agriculture, Mie University 12:1–112 [in Japanese with English summary].Google Scholar
  2. Adati S, Shiotani L (1962) The cytotaxonomy of the genus Miscanthus and its phylogenic status. Bull Fac Agric Mie Univ 25:1–24Google Scholar
  3. Andersson NJ (1856) Om de med Saccharum beslägtade genera. Öfvers Kungl Vet Adad Förh Stockholm 12:151–168Google Scholar
  4. Chen SL, Renvoize SA (2006) Miscanthus. Flora China 22:581–583Google Scholar
  5. Chou CH (1989) Population variation and evolutionary trend of Miscanthus taxa in Taiwan. In: Chou CH, Waller CH, Reinhardt GHC (eds) Biodiversity and allelopathy: from organisms to ecosystems in the Pacific. Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, pp 37–46Google Scholar
  6. Chou CH (2009) Miscanthus used as and alternative biofuel material: the basic studies on ecology and molecular evolution. Renewab Energy 34:1908–1912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chou CH, Lee YF (1991) Allelopathic dominance of Miscanthus transmorrisonensis in an alpine grassland community in Taiwan. J Chem Ecol 17:2267–2281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chou CH, Wang SY, Chang FC (1987) Population study of Miscanthus floridulus (Labill) Warb. I. Variation of peroxidase and esterase in 27 populations in Taiwan. Bot Bull Acad Sin 28:247–281Google Scholar
  9. Chou CH, Chiang YC, Chiang TY (1999) Interspecific and within-individual length heterogeneity of the rDNA-IGS in Miscanthus sinensis var. glaber (Poaceae): sequence comparison and phylogenetic analysis indicate natural hybridization. Genome 42:1088–93.Google Scholar
  10. Chou CH, Chiang TY, Chiang YC (2001) Towards an integrative biology research: a vase study on adaptive and evolutionary trend of Miscanthus population in Taiwan. Weed Biol Manag 1:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clayton WD, Renvoize SA (1986) Genera graminum, grasses of the world. Kew Bull Add Ser 13:1–389Google Scholar
  12. Clifton-Brown JC, Lewandowski I (2000) Overwintering problems of newly established Miscanthus plantations can be overcome by identifying genotypes with improved rhizome cold tolerance. New Phytol 148:287–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clifton-Brown JC, Neilson BM, Lewandowski I, Jones MB (2000) The modeled productivity of Miscanthus × giganteus (GREEF et DU) in Ireland. Ind Crop Prod 12:97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clifton-Brown JC, Stampfl PF, Jones MB (2004) Miscanthus biomass production for energy in Europe and its potential contribution to decreasing fossil fuel carbon emissions. Glob Chang Biol 10:509–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clifton-Brown JC, Breuer J, Jones MB (2007) Carbon mitigation by the energy crop, Miscanthus. Glob Change Biol 13:2296–2307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clifton-Brown JC, Chiang WC, Hodkinson TR (2008) Miscanthus genetic resources and breeding potential to enhance bioenergy production. In: Vermerris W (ed) Genetic improvement of bioenergy crops. Springer Science, New York, USA, pp 273–294Google Scholar
  17. Daniels J, Roach BT (1987) Taxonomy and evolution. In: Heinz DJ (ed) Sugarcane improvement through breeding. Elsevier, New York, USA, pp 7–84Google Scholar
  18. Darke R (1999) The color encyclopedia of ornamental grasses, sedges, restios, rushes, cat-tails, and selected bamboos. Timber, Portland, OR, USAGoogle Scholar
  19. Głowacka K, Jeżowski S, Kaczmarek Z (2009) Polyploidization of Miscanthus sinensis and Miscanthus × giganteus by plant colchicine treatment. Ind Crop Prod 30:444–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greef JM, Deuter M (1993) Syntaxonomy of Miscanthus ×giganteus Greef et Deu. Angew Bot 67:87–90Google Scholar
  21. Greef JM, Deuter M, Jung C, Schondelmaier J (1997) Genetic diversity of European Miscanthus species revealed by AFLP fingerprinting. Genet Resour Crop Evol 44:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hansen EM, Christensen BT, Jensen LS, Kristensen K (2004) Carbon sequestration in soil beneath long-term Miscanthus plantations as determined by 13C abundance. Biomass Bioenergy 26:97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hayashi I (1979) The autoecology of some grassland species. In: Numata M (ed) Ecology of grasslands and bamboolands in the world. W. Junk, Hague, Netherlands, pp 141–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hayashi I, Numata M (1971) Viable buried-seed populations in the Miscanthus and Zoysia type grasslands in Japan – Ecological studies on the buried-seed population in the soil as related to plant succession, VI. Jpn J Ecol 20:243–252Google Scholar
  25. Heaton AH, Clifton-Brown JC, Voight TV, Jones MB, Long PS (2004) Miscanthus for renewable energy generation: European Union experience projection for Illinois. Mitigat Adapt Strateg Glob Change 9:433–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heaton EA, Dohlmeman FG, Long SP (2008) Meeting US biofuels goals with less land: the potential of Miscanthus. Global Change Biology 14:2000–2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hernandez P, Dorado G, Laurie DA, Martin A (2001) Microsatellites and RFLP probes from maize are efficient sources of molecular markers for the biomass energy crop Miscanthus. Theor Appl Genet 102:616–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hirayoshi I, Nishikawa K, Kato R (1955) Cytogenetic studies on forage plants. (IV) Self-incompatibility in Miscanthus. Jpn J Breed 5:167–170 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  29. Hirayoshi I, Nishikawa K, Kubono M, Murase T (1957) Cyto-genetical studies on forage plants (VI) On the chromosome number of Ogi (Miscanthus sacchariflorus). Res Bull Fac Agric Gifu Univ 8:8–13 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  30. Hirayoshi I, Nishikawa K, Kubono M, Sakaida T (1959) Cyto-genetical studies on forage plants (VII) Chromosome conjugation and fertility of Miscanthus hybrids including M. sinensis M. sinensis var. condensatus and M. tinctorius. Res Bull Fac Agric Gifu Univ 11:86–91 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  31. Hirayoshi I, Nishikawa K, Hakura A (1960) Cyto-genetical studies on forage plants (VIII) 3x- and 4x- hybrid arisen from the cross Miscanthus sinensis var. condensatus × Miscanthus sacchariflorus. Res Bull Fac Agric Gifu Univ 12:82–88 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  32. Hodkinson TR, Renvoize SA (2001) Nomenclature of Miscanthus × giganteus. Kew Bull 56:757–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hodkinson TR, Chase MW, Takahashi C, Leitch IJ, Bennett MD, Renvoize SA (2002a) The use of DNA sequencing (ITS and trnL-F), AFLP, and fluorescent in situ hybridization to study allopolyploid Miscanthus (Poaceae). Am J Bot 89:279–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hodkinson TR, Chase MW, Takahashi C, Leitch IJ, Bennett MD, Renvoize SA (2002b) Characteristization of a genertic resource collection for Miscanthus (saccharineae, andropogoneae, poacea) using AFLP and ISSSR PCR. Am Bot 89:627–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hodkinson TR, Chase MW, Takahashi C, Leitch IJ, Bennett MD, Renvoize SA (2002c) Phylogenetics of Miscanthus, Saccharum and related genera (Saccharineae, Andropogoneae, Poacea) based on DNA sequencing from ITS nuclear ribosomal DNA and plasticd trnL intron and tmL-F intergenic spacers. J Plant Res 115:381–392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Honda M (1930) Monographia Poacearum Japonicarum, Bambusoideis exclusis. J Fac Sci Imperial Univ Tokyo Sect 3 Bot 3:1–484Google Scholar
  37. Hsu FH, Chou CH (1992) Inhibitory effects of heavy metals on seed germination and seedling growth of Miscanthus species. Bot Bull Acad Sin 33:335–342Google Scholar
  38. Ibaragi Y (2003) The taxonomy of Diantrantus (poaceea). Acta Phytotaxonom Geobot 54:109–125Google Scholar
  39. Ibaragi Y, Ohashi H (2004) A taxonomy study of Miscanthus section Kariyasua (Grammineae). J Jpn Bot 79:4–22Google Scholar
  40. Iwata H, Kamijo T, Tsumura Y (2005) Genetic structure of Miscanthus sinensis spp. condensatus (Poaceae) on Miyake Island: implications for revegetation of volcanic devasted sites. Ecol Res 20:233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jones MB, Walsh M (2001) Miscanthus for energy and fiber. James & James, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  42. Jorgensen U (1997) Genotypic variation in dry matter accumulation and content of N, K and Cl in Miscanthus in Denmark. Biomass Bioenergy 12:55–169Google Scholar
  43. Jorrgensen U, Muhs HJ (2001) Miscanthus breeding and improvement. In Miscanthus–For energy and Fiber, pp.68–85. Eds M.B. Jones and M. Wash. London, U.K: James and James (Science Publishers)Google Scholar
  44. Koyama T (1987) Grasses of Japan and its neighboring regions: an identification manual. Kodansha, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  45. Lafferty J, Lelley T (1994) Cytogenetic studies of different Miscanthus with potential for agriculture use. Plant Breed 113:246–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lee YN (1964a) Taxonomic studies on the genus Miscanthus: relationships among the section, subsection and species, part 1. J Jpn Bot 39:196–205Google Scholar
  47. Lee YN (1964b) Taxonomic studies on the genus Miscanthus: relationships among the section, subsection and species, part 2, enumeration of species and varieties. J Jpn Bot 39:257–265Google Scholar
  48. Lee YN (1964c) Taxonomic studies on the genus Miscanthus: relationships among the section, subsection and species, part 3, enumeration of species and varieties. J Jpn Bot 39:289–298Google Scholar
  49. Lee SC (1995) Taxonomy of Miscanthus (Poaceae) in Taiwan. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Biology, Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  50. Lewandowski I, Schmidt U (2006) Nitrogen, energy and land use efficiencies of Miscanthus, Reed canary grass and triticale as determined by the boundary line approach. Agric Ecosyst Environ 112:335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lewandowski I, Clifton-Brown JC, Andersn B, Basch G, Crhistian DG, Jørgensen U, Mb J, Rich AB, Scurlock JMO, Huisman W (2000) Miscanthus: European experience with a novel energy crop. Biomass Bioenergy 19:209–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lewandowski I, Clifton-Brown JC, Andersson B, Basch G, Christian DG, Jørgensen U, Jones MB, Riche AB, Schwarz U, Tayebi K, Teixeira F (2003) Environment and harvest time affects the combustion qualities of Miscanthus genotypes. Agron J 95:1274–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Linde-Laursen IB (1993) Cytogenetic analysis of Miscanthus ‘Giganteus’, an interspecific hybrid. Hereditas 119:297–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mantineo M, D’Agosta GM, Copani V, Patane C, Consentino SL (2009) Biomass yield energy balance of three perennial crops for energy use in the semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Field Crop Res 114:204–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nakagoshi N (1984) Buried viable seed populations in forest communities on the Hiba Mountains, Southwestern Japan. J Sci Hiroshima Univ Ser B Div 2(19):1–56Google Scholar
  56. Nielsen PN (1990) Elefantengrassanbau in Dänemark-Praktikerbericht. Pflug Spaten 3:1–4Google Scholar
  57. Powlson DS, Rich AB, Shield I (2005) Biofuels and other approaches for decreasing fossil fuel emissions from agriculture. Ann Appl Biol 146:193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rayburn AL, Crawford J, Rayburn CM, Juvik JA (2009) Genome size of three Miscanthus species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 27:184–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Renvoize SA (2003) The genus Miscanthus. Plantman 2:207–211Google Scholar
  60. Scally L, Hodkinson T, Jones MB (2001) Origins and taxonomy of Miscanthus. In: Jones MB, Walsh M (eds) Miscanthus for energy and fiber. James & James, London, UK, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  61. Schwarz KU, Murphy DPL, Schnug E (1994) Studies of the growth and yield of Miscanthus × giganteus in Germany. Asp Appl Biol 40:533–540Google Scholar
  62. Sims REH, Hastings A, Schlamadinger B, Taylor G, Smith P (2006) Energy crops: current status and future prospects. Glob Change Biol 12:2054–2076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stamyf P, Clifton-Brown JC, Jones MB (2007) European wide GIS-based modeling system for quantifying the feedstock from Miscanthus and the potential contribution to renewable energy targets. Glob Change Biol 13:2283–2295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stewart RJ, Toma Y, Fernandez FG, Nishiwaki A, Yamada T, Bollero G (2009) The ecology and agronomy of Miscanthus sinensis, a species important to bioenergy crop development in its native range in Japan: a review. Glob Change Biol Bioenerg 1:126–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Watson L, Dallwitz MJ (1992) Grass genera of the world: descriptions, illustrations, identification, and information retrieval; including synonyms, morphology, anatomy, physiology, phytochemistry, cytology, classification, pathogens, world and local distribution, and references. http://biodiversity.uno.edu/delta/version. Accessed 18 Aug 1999
  66. Weng JH, Ueng RG (1997) Effect of temperature on photosynthesis of Miscanthus clones collected from different elevation. Photosynthetica 34:307–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kossonou Guillaume Anzoua
    • 1
  • Toshihiko Yamada
    • 2
  • Robert J. Henry
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Field Science Center for Northern BiosphereHokkaido UniversitySapporo-cityJapan
  2. 2.Field Science Center for Northern BiosphereHokkaido UniversitySapporo-cityJapan
  3. 3.Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food InnovationThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations