Abstract
This chapter analyzes the direct and indirect income effects of international labor migration and remittances in selected CIS countries. The analysis is based on CGE models for Moldova, Ukraine, Georgia and Kyrgyzstan. We find that these countries would experience a sharp contraction of private consumption and substantial decline in GDP in the absence of remittances. Because of the important contribution of migration and remittances to stabilizing and sustaining incomes, enhanced opportunities for legal labor migration should figure prominently in any deepening of bilateral relations between CIS countries and the EU under the ENP.
Acknowledgements
This chapter summarizes the findings of ENEPO Work Package 8: Analysis of Outward Migration in Selected CIS Countries. The country case studies on which this chapter is based are described in detail in Atamanov et al. (2009). They were authored by Matthias Luecke and Toman Omar Mahmoud (Moldova); Vitaliy Vavryschuk (Ukraine); Kseniya Tereshchenko and Ainura Uzagalieva (Georgia); and Aziz Atamanov and Roman Mogilevsky (Kyrgyzstan).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Data from the World Development Indicators database (which we use in Figs. 7.1–7.3 for the sake of consistency over time) are only available through 2008. More recent information on output developments in the selected CIS countries is provided, inter alia, by the IMF Regional Economic Outlook for Europe, and IMF Regional Economic Outlook for Middle East and Central Asia: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/reo/reorepts.aspx
- 2.
This section draws extensively on Fagernas (2004).
- 3.
We also explored the feasibility of using a recursive-dynamic CGE model to complement our comparative-static simulations. A more explicitly dynamic structure would reflect the investment process more accurately and thereby provide additional insights into the growth effects of remittances. However, the additional assumptions required to implement a recursive-dynamic model turned out to be far-reaching. Overall, we would have introduced a high level of arbitrariness into the analysis such that the more detailed description of the investment process in the recursive-dynamic model would ultimately have been meaningless.
- 4.
For an overview over the main CGE modeling approaches with references to appropriate literature, see Robinson (2003).
- 5.
The original case study on which this section is based was authored by Matthias Luecke and Toman Omar Mahmoud (see Atamanov et al. 2009).
- 6.
The original case study on which this section is based was authored by Vitaliy Vavryschuk (see Atamanov et al. 2009).
- 7.
The original case study on which this section is based was authored by Kseniya Tereshchenko and Ainura Uzagalieva (see Atamanov et al 2009).
- 8.
The original case study on which this section is based (see Atamanov et al. 2009) was authored by Aziz Atamanov and Roman Mogilevsky.
References
Atamanov A et al (2009) Income and distribution effects of migration and remittances: an analysis based on CGE models for selected CIS Countries. CASE Netw Rep 86
Fagernas S (2004) Analysing the distributional impacts of stabilisation policy with a CGE model: illustrations and critique for Zimbabwe. ESAU Work Pap 4. Overseas Development Institute, London.
GET (2007) Georgian economic trends, quarterly economic trends. Georgian-European Policy and Legal Advice Centre, October.
GET (2008): Georgian economic trends, quarterly economic trends. Georgian-European Policy and Legal Advice Centre, February.
Havrylyshyn O (2008) Growth recovery in CIS Countries: the sufficient minimum threshold of reforms. Comp Econ Stud 50:53–78
IFAD (2006) Sending money home. Worldwide remittance flows to developing and transition countries. International Fund for Agricultural Development
IOM (2006) Human trafficking survey: Belarus, Bulgaria, Moldova, Romania and Ukraine. International Organization for Migration in Ukraine. Prepared by GFK Ukraine
Lofgren H, Lee Harris R, Robinson S (2002) A standard computable general equilibrium (CGE) model in GAMS. Microcomput in Policy Res 5, IFPRI. Washington D.C.
Luecke M, Omar Mahmoud T, Steinmayr A (2009) Labour migration and remittances in Moldova: Is the boom over? International Organization for Migration, Moldova Office, Chisinau
Mogilevsky R, Atamanov A (2008) Social-economic implications of outward migration in the Kyrgyz Republic. CASE-Kyrgyzstan
Poznyak O (2002) Mashtaby zovnishnih trudovyh migratsii naselennia Ukrainy (Scale of external labor migration of Ukrainian population). Ukraina: Aspekty Pratsi (Ukraine: Labor Aspects) 6: 37-40
Robinson S (2003) Macro models and multipliers: Leontief, Stone, Keynes, and CGE models. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). mimeo, September. Online: www.ifpri.org/events/seminars/2003/20031014/robinson_thorbecke_EPIAM.pdf
SDSG (2005) Households of Georgia 2003–2004. State Department for Statistics of Georgia, Tbilisi
SDSG (2007) Statistical Yearbook of Georgia 2007. State Department for Statistics of Georgia, Tbilisi
Starodub A, Parkhomenko N (2005) Ukrainska trudova migratsia do krain ES v dzerkali sotsiologii (Ukrainian labor migration to the EU countries in the mirror of sociology). Center for Peace, Conversion and Foreign Policy of Ukraine, Kyiv
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Luecke, M. (2012). Income and Distribution Effects of Migration and Remittances. In: Dabrowski, M., Maliszewska, M. (eds) EU Eastern Neighborhood. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21093-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21093-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21092-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21093-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)