Skip to main content

DWI of the Breast

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Diffusion MRI Outside the Brain

Abstract

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of the breast has high sensitivity for breast cancer detection but lacks specificity for characterizing breast tumors. Hence, several studies have investigated the role of advanced MRI techniques, such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), to improve the specificity of MRI for the evaluation of breast lesions and to achieve improvements in positive predictive value (PPV). DWI is an unenhanced MRI sequence that measures the mobility of water molecules (Brownian motion) in vivo (in tissues) and provides different and potentially complementary information to DCE-MRI. Promising findings from preliminary DWI studies of the breast have shown significantly lower ADC measures for breast carcinomas than for benign breast lesions or normal tissue. Currently, there is controversy to define the most adequate threshold ADC values to differentiate between the different subtypes of invasive carcinomas or between intraductal carcinoma and invasive carcinoma. Besides, there are reports which have not shown significant differences in the behavior on DWI of benign and malignant tumors. DWI had some technical limitations and challenges such as patient movement, the analysis of diffuse and small lesions, to define the appropriate degree of diffusion sensitization to apply (b value) and to limit artifacts related to magnetic susceptibility and chemical shift. Besides, DWI opens a door for advanced clinical applications such as treatment response prediction, postchemotherapy monitorization, screening in high-risk population, or locoregional staging of breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Further Reading

  • Arantes F, Martins G, Figueiredo E et al (2009) Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values. Am J Roentgenol 193:1030–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Dietzel M et al (2010) Sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MR mammography (DWI combined with T2-weighted TSE imaging, ueMRM) for the differentiation of mass lesions. Eur Radiol 20(5):1101–1110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barceló J, Vilanova JC, Albanell J et al (2009) Breast MRI: the usefulness of diffusion-weighted sequences for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions. Radiología 51(5):469–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron P, Dorrius MD, Kappert P et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted imaging of normal fibroglandular breast tissue: influence of microperfusion and fat suppression technique on the apparent diffusion coefficient. NMR Biomed 23(4):399–405

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bogner W, Gruber S, Pinker K et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? Radiology 253(2):341–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Li WL, Zhang YL et al (2010) Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the ­differential diagnosis of breast lesions. BMC Cancer 29(10):693–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costantini M, Belli P, Rinaldi P et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast cancer: relationship between apparent ­diffusion coefficient and tumour aggressiveness. Clin Radiol 65(12):1005–1012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ei Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging. Radiology 256(1):64–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fangberget A, Nilsen LB, Hole KH et al (2011) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer-response evaluation and prediction of response to treatment using dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol 21(6):1188–1199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL et al (2002) Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:172–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heusner TA, Kuemmel S, Hamami ME et al (2010) Diagnostic value of DWI MRI compared to FDG PET/CT for whole body breast cancer staging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37(6):1077–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang W, Fisher PR, Dulaimy K et al (2004) Detection of breast malignancy: diagnostic MR protocol for improved specificity. Radiology 232:585–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iacconi C (2010) Diffusion and perfusion of the breast. Eur J Radiol 76(3):386–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Imamura T, Isomoto I, Sueyoshi E et al (2010) Diagnostic performance of ADC for non-mass-like breast lesions on MR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 9(4):217–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs MA, Barker PB, Bluemke DA et al (2003) Benign and malignant breast lesions diagnosis with multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 229:225–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeh SK, Kim SH, Kim HS et al (2011) Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging findings with prognostic factors in invasive ductal carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 33(1):102–109. doi:10.1002/jmri.22400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SH, Cha ES, Kim HS et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer: correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors. J Magn Reson Imaging 30(3):615–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinoshita T, Yashiro N, Ihara N et al (2002) Diffusion-weighted half-fourier single-shot turbo spin echo imaging in breast tumors: differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma from fibroadenoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:1042–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E et al (2011) Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. Am J Roentgenol 196(1):210–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuroki Y, Nasu K, Kuroki S et al (2004) Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer with the sensitivity encoding technique: analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient value. Magn Reson Med Sci 3:79–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marini C, Iacconi C, Giannelli M et al (2007) Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion. Eur Radiol 17:2646–2655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matsubayashi RN, Fujii T, Yasumori K et al (2010) Apparent diffusion coefficient in invasive ductal breast carcinoma: correlation with detailed histologic features and the enhan­cement ratio on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images. J Oncol 2010:pii: 821048, Epub Sep 2, 2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes LW, Schanall MD, Orel SG (2001) Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. Radiology 219:484–494

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park SH, Moon WK, Cho N et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Radiology 257(1):56–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge S, De Martini W, Kurland B et al (2009) Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. Am J Roentgenol 193:1716–1722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge SC, Demartini WB, Kurland BF et al (2010) Differential diagnosis of mammographically and clinically occult breast lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 31(3):562–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge SC, Mullins CD, Kurland BF et al (2010) Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size. Am J Roentgenol 194(6):1664–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge SC, Ziadloo A, Murthy R et al (2010) Diffusion tensor MRI: preliminary anisotropy measures and mapping of breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 31(2):339–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge SC, Rahbar H, Murthy R et al (2011) Improved diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI through combined apparent diffusion coefficients and dynamic contrast-enhanced kinetics. Magn Reson Med. doi:10.1002/mrm.22762, Epub ahead of print

  • Pediconi F, Catalano C, Occhiato R et al (2005) Breast lesion detection and characterization at contrast-enhanced MR mammography: gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology 237:45–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira FP, Martins G, Figueiredo E et al (2009) Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values. Am J Roentgenol 193(4):1030–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira FP, Martins G, Carvalhaes de Oliveira Rde V (2011) Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 19(1):95–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters NH, Vincken KL, van den Bosch MA et al (2010) Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: the influence of the choice of b-values. J Magn Reson Imaging 31(5):1100–1105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pickles MD, Gibbs P, Lowry M et al (2006) Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 24(7):843–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi P, Giuliani M, Belli P et al (2010) DWI in breast MRI: role of ADC value to determine diagnosis between recurrent tumor and surgical scar in operated patients. Eur J Radiol 75(2):e114–e123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubesova E, Grell AS, De Maertelaer V et al (2006) Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:319–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Satake H, Nishio A, Ikeda M et al (2011) Predictive value for malignancy of suspicious breast masses of BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 using ultrasound elastography and MR diffusion-weighted imaging. Am J Roentgenol 196(1):202–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma U, Danishad KK, Seenu V et al (2009) Longitudinal study of the assessment by MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging of tumor response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. NMR Biomed 22(1):104–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund EE, Cho GY, Kim S et al (2011) Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of tumor microenvironment in locally advanced breast cancer. Magn Reson Med. doi:10.1002/mrm.22740, Epub ahead of print

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U et al (2002) In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:693–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura T, Usui S, Murakami S et al (2010) Biexponential signal attenuation analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging of breast. Magn Reson Med Sci 9(4):195–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thoeny HC, Ross BD (2010) Predicting and monitoring cancer treatment response with diffusion-weighted MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 32(1):2–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tozaki M, Fukuma E (2009) 1H MR Spectroscopy and difusión-weighted imaging of the breast: are they useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy? Am J Roentgenol 193:840–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsushima Y, Takahashi-Taketomi A, Endo K (2009) Magnetic resonance (MR) differential diagnosis of breast tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on 1.5-T. J Magn Reson Imaging 30(2):249–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vilanova JC, Barcelo J (2008) Diffusion-weighted whole-body MR screening. Eur J Radiol 67:440–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Iwabuchi K et al (2005) Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:644–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Kan S et al (2005) ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. Magn Reson Med Sci 4:35–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhams R, Kakita S, Hata H et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in correlation with histologic findings. Am J Roentgenol 193:260–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhams R, Kakita S, Hata H et al (2010) Identification of residual breast carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemo­therapy: diffusion-weighted imaging – comparison with contrast-enhanced MR imaging and pathologic findings. Radiology 254(2):357–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Sunami S et al (2011) Detection of non-palpable breast cancer in asymptomatic women by using unenhanced diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted MR imaging: comparison with mammography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol 21(1):11–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yili Z, Xiaoyan H, Hongwen D et al (2009) The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in assessing the ADC changes of tissues adjacent to breast carcinoma. BMC Cancer 14:9–18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joaquim Barceló .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barceló, J., Vilanova, J.C., Luna, A. (2012). DWI of the Breast. In: Diffusion MRI Outside the Brain. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21052-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21052-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21051-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21052-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics