The Feasibility Study of Attacker Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Young-Joo Kim
  • Sejun Song
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 151)


Wireless Sensor Networks have much vulnerability in the aspect of security because sensor nodes are limited in power, computational capabilities, and memory, and they even use a shared medium. For this reason, wireless sensor networks can be attacked easily by adversary and their attacks are mainly accomplished through channels or frequencies being used by these nodes using various attack mechanisms. Representative one of these attacks is DoS (Denial-of-Service) attack such as jamming attack, collision attack, and flooding attack. As DoS is attack which diminishes or eliminates a network’s capacity, sensor nodes must be able to prevent or detect DoS attack. Mechanisms corresponding to this have been studied. No work, however, can cover these attacks because there are so many attack patterns and trade-offs between performance and accuracy. In this paper, we present a simple approach which can detect attack’s location as fast as possible using CCA (Clear Channel Assessment) value. For this, we do the feasibility study for our approach through the experiment using TinyOS mica2 nodes. In addition to, we suggest new some alternatives through this study. As its result, we can speculate that the rate of false alarm is high but the detection time may be reduced in detecting attack’s location.


Wireless Sensor Networks Attacks Denial-of-Service CCA 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    ITU-T: Distributed Computing: Utilities, Grids & Clouds. ITU-T Technology Watch Reports, International Telecommunication Union (2009) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akyildiz, L., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Cayirci, E.: A Survey on Sensor Networks. Communications Magazine 40(8), 102–114 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kuorilehto, M., Hannikainen, M., Hamalainen, T.: A Survey of Application Distribution in Wireless Sensor Networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking 5(5), 774–788 (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yick, J., Mukherjee, B., Ghosal, D.: Wireless sensor network survey. Computer Networks: Int’l Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking (ACM) 52(12), 2292–2330 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wood, A., Stankovic, J.: Denial of Service in Sensor Networks. Computer 35(10), 54–62 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Raymond, D., Midkiff, S.: Denial-of-Service in Wireless Sensor Networks: Attacks and Defenses. In: Pervasive Computing, pp. 74–81. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xu, W., et al.: The Feasibility of Launching and Detecting Jamming Attacks in Wireless Networks. In: MobiHoc 2005: Proc. 6th ACM Int’l. Symp. Mobile Ad Hoc Net. and Comp., pp. 46–57 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Law, Y., et al.: Link-Layer Jamming Attacks on S-Mac. In: Proc. 2nd Euro. Wksp. Wireless Sensor Networks, pp. 217–225 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xu, W., Ma, K., Trappe, W., Zhang, Y.: Jamming Sensor Networks: Attack and Defenses Strategies: IEEE Network, 41–47 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Han, S., Chang, E., Gao, L., Dillon, T.: Taxonomy of Attacks on Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proc. of the First European Conference on Computer Network Defence (EC2ND 2005), pp. 97–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reindl, P., Nygard, K., Du, X.: Defending Malicious Collision Attacks in Wireless Sensor Networks. In: IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 771–776. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kulkarni, R., Venayagamoorthy, G., Thakur, A., Madria, S.: Generalized Neuron Based Secure Media Access Control Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proc. of Computational Intelligence in Miulti-criteria Decision-making, pp. 16–22. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    CERT Coordination Center: Smurf IP denial-of-service attacks. Technical report, CERT Advisory CA-98:01 (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aura, T., Nikander, P.: Stateless connections. In: Han, Y., Quing, S. (eds.) ICICS 1997. LNCS, vol. 1334, pp. 87–97. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Singh, V., Jain, S., Singhai, J.: Hello Flood Attack and its Countermeasures in Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Computer Science Issues 11, 23–27 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Perrig, W., Stankovic, J., Wagner, D.: Security in Wireless Sensor Networks. Communication of the ACM 47(6), 53–57 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hu, N., Smith, R., Bradford, P.: Security for fixed sensor networks. In: ACM Southeast Regional Conference, pp. 212–213 (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang, H., Ye, F., Yuan, Y., Lu, S., Arbaugh, W.: Toward resilient security in wireless sensor networks. In: Proc. of ACM Sym. on Mobile Ad Hoe Networking and Computing, pp. 34–45 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li, Z., Trappe, W., Zhang, Y., Nath, B.: Robust Statistical Methods for Securing Wireless Localization in Sensor Networks. In: Proc. International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp. 91–98. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Olariu, S., Xu, Q.: Information assurance in wireless sensor networks. In: Proc. of the 19th IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Engstrom, J., Gray, C.: Clear Channel Assessment in Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proc. of the 46th Annual Southeast Regional Conference (ACM-SE 2008), pp. 464–468. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ramachandran, I., Roy, S.: Clear Channel Assessment in Energy-Constrained Wideband Wireless Networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 70–78 (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ramachandran, I., Roy, S.: On the Impact of Clear Channel Assessment on MAC Performance. In: Proc. of Global Telecommunications Conference, pp. 1–5. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Culler, D.: TinyOS: Operating System Design for Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Young-Joo Kim
    • 1
  • Sejun Song
    • 1
  1. 1.ETID DepartmentTexas A&M UniversityTexasU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations