Abstract
Reprogramming somatic adult cells makes it possible to obtain induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) without the necessity of destroying human embryos. Nonetheless, this technique gives rise to unexpected ethical challenges. In particular, the possibility of using reprogramming to create human gametes and eventually embryos has provoked arguments negating the moral status of human embryos that can be grown in culture. To face these new ethical challenges we introduce the concept of proper biological potential for developing a body exhibiting human architecture and spontaneous motility and further propose that personhood can be ascertained on the basis of this proper biological potential. We then argue that the embryo’s proper biological potential for developing the neural activity responsible for fetal motility is not determined by implantation and so embryos grown in culture deserve the same moral status as the embryos after implantation. Additionally, we articulate our philosophical reasons for our support of the clinical criteria for defining death and our support of the criterion of DIANA insufficiencies (insufficiencies that Directly Inhibit the Appearance of Neural Activity) for distinguishing between disabled embryos and nonembryos.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aquinas Thomas (CTh) Compendium theologiae, ch. XCII. http://dhspriory.org/thomas/Compendium.htm. Cited 14 March 2011
Aristotle (MA) On the motions of animals, Part 11. The Internet Classics Archive http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/motion_animals.html. Cited 26 Feb 2011
Aristotle (NE) Nicomachean ethics, Book III, 1. The Internet classics archive http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.3.iii.html. Cited 14 March 2011
Ashley B, Moraczewski A (2001) Cloning, Aquinas and the embryonic person. Natl Cathol Bioeth Q 1:189–201
Boediono A, Suzuki T, Li LY, Godke RA (1999) Offspring born from chimeras reconstructed from parthenogenetic and in vitro fertilized bovine embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 53:159–170
Boland MJ, Hazen JL, Nazor KL, Rodriguez AR, Gifford W, Martin G, Kupriyanov S, Baldwin KK (2009) Adult mice generated from induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 461:91–94
Check E (2006) Simple recipe gives adult cells embryonic powers. Nature 442:11
Condic ML (2003) Life: defining the beginning by the end. First Things 133:50–54
Condic ML (2008) When does human life begin? A scientific perspective. The Westchester Institute for Ethics & the Human Person. White Paper 1:1–18
Condic ML, Condic SB (2005) Defining organisms by organization. Natl Cathol Bioeth Q 5:339
Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith (2008) Instruction Dignitas personae, p. 18 and footnote 49
De Vries JIP, Visser GHA, Prechtl HFR (1982) The emergence of fetal behaviour: I Qualitative aspects. Early Hum Dev 7:301–322
Denker HW (2009) Ethical concerns over use of new cloning technique in humans. Nature 461:341
Fraidenraich D, Stillwell E, Romero E, Wilkes D, Manova K, Basson CT, Benezra R (2004) Rescue of cardiac defects in id knockout embryos by injection of embryonic Stem Cells. Science 306:247–252
Gardner RL, Barton SC, Surani MA (1990) Use of triple tissue blastocyst reconstitution to study the development of diploid parthenogenetic primitive ectoderm in combination with fertilization-derived trophectoderm and primitive endoderm. Genet Res 56:209–222
González F, Boué S, Izpisúa Belmonte JC (2011) Methods for making induced pluripotent stem cells: reprogramming á la carte. Nature Rev. Genet. 12:231–242
Huarte J, Suarez A (2004) On the status of parthenotes. Defining the developmental potentiality of a human embryo. Natl Cathol Bioeth Q 4:535–550
Hurlbut WB (2005a) Altered nuclear transfer as a morally acceptable means for the procurement of human embryonic stem cells. Perspect Biol Med 48:211–28
Hurlbut WB (2005b) Correspondence: altered nuclear transfer. New Engl J Med 352:1153
Jones DA (2004) The soul of the embryo: an enquiry into the status of the human embryo in the Christian tradition. Continuum, London, Ch. 8 (The timing of ensoulment)
Kang L, Wang J, Zhang Y, Kou Z, Gao S (2009) iPS can support full-term development of tetraploid blastocyst-complemented embryos. Cell Stem Cell 5:135–138
Kono T, Obata Y, Yoshimzu T, Nakahara T, Carroll J (1996) Epigenetic modifications during oocyte growth correlates with extended parthenogenetic development in the mouse. Nat Genet 13:91–94
Kono T, Sotomaru Y, Katsuzawa Y, Dandolo L (2002) Mouse parthenogenetic embryos with monoallelic H19 expression can develop to day 17.5 of gestation. Dev Biol 243:294–300
Kono T, Obata Y, Wu Q, Niwa K, Ono Y, Yamamoto Y, Park ES, Seo JS, Ogawa H (2004) Birth of parthenogenetic mice that can develop to adulthood. Nature 428:860–864
Laureys S (2005) Science and society: death, unconsciousness and the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:899–909
Libet B (1985) Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Behav Brain Sci 8:529–566
Libet B (1992) Voluntary acts and readiness potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 82:85–86
Libet B (2002) The timing of mental events: Libet’s experimental findings and their implications. Conscious Cogn 11:291–299
Loebel DAF, Tam PPL (2004) Genomic imprinting. Mice without a father. Nature 428:809–811
MacKay GE, West JD (2005) Fate of tetraploid cells in 4n↔2n chimeric mouse blastocysts. Mech Dev 122:1266–1281
Meissner A, Jaenisch R (2006) Generation of nuclear transfer-derived pluripotent ES cells from cloned Cdx2-deficient blastocysts. Nature 439:212–215
Nature (2008) Life after SuperBabe (Editorial), and making babies: the next 30 years (Special Report by H. Pearson). Nature 454: 253, 260–262
Nature (2009) Delimiting death (Editorial). Nature 461:570
Nüsslein-Volhard Ch (2004) Das Werden des Lebens. Verlag CH Beck, Munich, pp 189–191
Plath K, Lowry WE (2011) Progress in understanding reprogramming to the induced pluripotent state. Nature Rev. Genet. 12:253–265
Poueymirou WT, Auerbach W, Frendewey D, Hickey JF, Escaravage JM, Esau L, Doré AT, Stevens S, Adams NC, Dominguez MG, Gale NW, Yancopoulos GD, DeChiara TM, Valenzuela DM (2007) F0 generation mice fully derived from gene-targeted embryonic stem cells allowing immediate phenotypic analyses. Nat Biotechnol 25:91–9
Rao M, Condic ML (2008) Alternative sources of pluripotent stem cells: scientific solutions to an ethical dilemma. Stem Cells Dev 17:1–10
Rizzolatti G, Craighero L (2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:169–192
Rodríguez-Luño A (2006) Il dibattito sull’identità e lo statuto dell’embrione umano. Etica e politica, Bioetica. http://www.eticaepolitica.net/bioetica.htm Cited 26 Feb 2011
Rogers NT, Hobson E, Pickering S, Lai FA, Braude P, Swann K (2004) Phospholipase Cz causes Ca2+ oscillations and parthenogenetic activation of human oocytes. Reproduction 128:697–702
Rossant J, Spence A (1998) Chimeras and mosaics in mouse mutant analysis. Trends Genet 14:358–363
Schöler H (2007) Ein Embryo ist kein Fötus und eine Zelle kein Mensch. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 11 September
Shewmon A (2004) The ‘critical organ’ for the organism as a whole. In: Machado C, Shewmon A (eds) Brain death and disorders of consciousness. Kluwer, New York, pp 26–35
Strain L, Warner JP, Johnston T, Bonthron DT (1995) A human parthenogenetic chimera. Nat Genet 11:164–169
Suarez A (1993) Sono l’embrione umano, il bambino con anencefalia ed il paziente in stato vegetativo persistente persone umane? Una dimostrazione razionale a partire dai movimenti spontanei. Acta Philosophica 2:105–125
Suarez A, Lang M, Huarte J (2007) DIANA Anomalies. Criteria for generating human pluripotent stem cells without embryos. Natl Cathol Bioeth Q 7:315–335
Suarez A (2011) Is this cell entity a human being? Neural activity, spiritual soul, and the status of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). In: Suarez A, Huarte J (eds) Is this cell a human being? Springer, Berlin, pp 171–192
Takabashi K, Yamanaka S (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126:663–676
The National Institute of Health (2001a) Stem cell report, Appendix A: Early development. http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/scireport/appendixa.asp. Cited 26 Feb 2011
The National Institute of Health (2001b) Stem cell report, Chapter 1: The stem cell http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/scireport/chapter1.asp. Cited 26 Feb 2011
Wongtawan T, Taylor JE, Lawson KA, Wilmut I, Pennings S (2011) Histone H4K20me3 and HP1 are late heterochromatin markers in development, but present in undifferentiated embryonic stem cells. J. Cell Sci 124:1878–1890
Zhao XY, Li W, Lv Z, Liu L, Tong M, Hai T, Hao J, Guo CL, Ma QW, Wang L, Zeng F, Zhou Q (2009) iPS cells produce viable mice through tetraploid complementation. Nature 461:86–90
Zwaka TP, Thomson JA (2005) A germ cell origin of embryonic stem cells? Development 132:227–233
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huarte, J., Suarez, A. (2011). Embryos Grown in Culture Deserve the Same Moral Status as Embryos After Implantation. In: Suarez, A., Huarte, J. (eds) Is this Cell a Human Being?. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20772-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20772-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20771-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20772-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)