Skip to main content

Embryos Grown in Culture Deserve the Same Moral Status as Embryos After Implantation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Reprogramming somatic adult cells makes it possible to obtain induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) without the necessity of destroying human embryos. Nonetheless, this technique gives rise to unexpected ethical challenges. In particular, the possibility of using reprogramming to create human gametes and eventually embryos has provoked arguments negating the moral status of human embryos that can be grown in culture. To face these new ethical challenges we introduce the concept of proper biological potential for developing a body exhibiting human architecture and spontaneous motility and further propose that personhood can be ascertained on the basis of this proper biological potential. We then argue that the embryo’s proper biological potential for developing the neural activity responsible for fetal motility is not determined by implantation and so embryos grown in culture deserve the same moral status as the embryos after implantation. Additionally, we articulate our philosophical reasons for our support of the clinical criteria for defining death and our support of the criterion of DIANA insufficiencies (insufficiencies that Directly Inhibit the Appearance of Neural Activity) for distinguishing between disabled embryos and nonembryos.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aquinas Thomas (CTh) Compendium theologiae, ch. XCII. http://dhspriory.org/thomas/Compendium.htm. Cited 14 March 2011

  • Aristotle (MA) On the motions of animals, Part 11. The Internet Classics Archive http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/motion_animals.html. Cited 26 Feb 2011

  • Aristotle (NE) Nicomachean ethics, Book III, 1. The Internet classics archive http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.3.iii.html. Cited 14 March 2011

  • Ashley B, Moraczewski A (2001) Cloning, Aquinas and the embryonic person. Natl Cathol Bioeth Q 1:189–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boediono A, Suzuki T, Li LY, Godke RA (1999) Offspring born from chimeras reconstructed from parthenogenetic and in vitro fertilized bovine embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 53:159–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boland MJ, Hazen JL, Nazor KL, Rodriguez AR, Gifford W, Martin G, Kupriyanov S, Baldwin KK (2009) Adult mice generated from induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 461:91–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Check E (2006) Simple recipe gives adult cells embryonic powers. Nature 442:11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Condic ML (2003) Life: defining the beginning by the end. First Things 133:50–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Condic ML (2008) When does human life begin? A scientific perspective. The Westchester Institute for Ethics & the Human Person. White Paper 1:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Condic ML, Condic SB (2005) Defining organisms by organization. Natl Cathol Bioeth Q 5:339

    Google Scholar 

  • Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith (2008) Instruction Dignitas personae, p. 18 and footnote 49

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries JIP, Visser GHA, Prechtl HFR (1982) The emergence of fetal behaviour: I Qualitative aspects. Early Hum Dev 7:301–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Denker HW (2009) Ethical concerns over use of new cloning technique in humans. Nature 461:341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fraidenraich D, Stillwell E, Romero E, Wilkes D, Manova K, Basson CT, Benezra R (2004) Rescue of cardiac defects in id knockout embryos by injection of embryonic Stem Cells. Science 306:247–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RL, Barton SC, Surani MA (1990) Use of triple tissue blastocyst reconstitution to study the development of diploid parthenogenetic primitive ectoderm in combination with fertilization-derived trophectoderm and primitive endoderm. Genet Res 56:209–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • González F, Boué S, Izpisúa Belmonte JC (2011) Methods for making induced pluripotent stem cells: reprogramming á la carte. Nature Rev. Genet. 12:231–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huarte J, Suarez A (2004) On the status of parthenotes. Defining the developmental potentiality of a human embryo. Natl Cathol Bioeth Q 4:535–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbut WB (2005a) Altered nuclear transfer as a morally acceptable means for the procurement of human embryonic stem cells. Perspect Biol Med 48:211–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbut WB (2005b) Correspondence: altered nuclear transfer. New Engl J Med 352:1153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DA (2004) The soul of the embryo: an enquiry into the status of the human embryo in the Christian tradition. Continuum, London, Ch. 8 (The timing of ensoulment)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang L, Wang J, Zhang Y, Kou Z, Gao S (2009) iPS can support full-term development of tetraploid blastocyst-complemented embryos. Cell Stem Cell 5:135–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kono T, Obata Y, Yoshimzu T, Nakahara T, Carroll J (1996) Epigenetic modifications during oocyte growth correlates with extended parthenogenetic development in the mouse. Nat Genet 13:91–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kono T, Sotomaru Y, Katsuzawa Y, Dandolo L (2002) Mouse parthenogenetic embryos with monoallelic H19 expression can develop to day 17.5 of gestation. Dev Biol 243:294–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kono T, Obata Y, Wu Q, Niwa K, Ono Y, Yamamoto Y, Park ES, Seo JS, Ogawa H (2004) Birth of parthenogenetic mice that can develop to adulthood. Nature 428:860–864

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laureys S (2005) Science and society: death, unconsciousness and the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:899–909

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Libet B (1985) Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Behav Brain Sci 8:529–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libet B (1992) Voluntary acts and readiness potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 82:85–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Libet B (2002) The timing of mental events: Libet’s experimental findings and their implications. Conscious Cogn 11:291–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loebel DAF, Tam PPL (2004) Genomic imprinting. Mice without a father. Nature 428:809–811

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay GE, West JD (2005) Fate of tetraploid cells in 4n↔2n chimeric mouse blastocysts. Mech Dev 122:1266–1281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meissner A, Jaenisch R (2006) Generation of nuclear transfer-derived pluripotent ES cells from cloned Cdx2-deficient blastocysts. Nature 439:212–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nature (2008) Life after SuperBabe (Editorial), and making babies: the next 30 years (Special Report by H. Pearson). Nature 454: 253, 260–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature (2009) Delimiting death (Editorial). Nature 461:570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nüsslein-Volhard Ch (2004) Das Werden des Lebens. Verlag CH Beck, Munich, pp 189–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Plath K, Lowry WE (2011) Progress in understanding reprogramming to the induced pluripotent state. Nature Rev. Genet. 12:253–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poueymirou WT, Auerbach W, Frendewey D, Hickey JF, Escaravage JM, Esau L, Doré AT, Stevens S, Adams NC, Dominguez MG, Gale NW, Yancopoulos GD, DeChiara TM, Valenzuela DM (2007) F0 generation mice fully derived from gene-targeted embryonic stem cells allowing immediate phenotypic analyses. Nat Biotechnol 25:91–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao M, Condic ML (2008) Alternative sources of pluripotent stem cells: scientific solutions to an ethical dilemma. Stem Cells Dev 17:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti G, Craighero L (2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:169–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Luño A (2006) Il dibattito sull’identità e lo statuto dell’embrione umano. Etica e politica, Bioetica. http://www.eticaepolitica.net/bioetica.htm Cited 26 Feb 2011

  • Rogers NT, Hobson E, Pickering S, Lai FA, Braude P, Swann K (2004) Phospholipase Cz causes Ca2+ oscillations and parthenogenetic activation of human oocytes. Reproduction 128:697–702

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossant J, Spence A (1998) Chimeras and mosaics in mouse mutant analysis. Trends Genet 14:358–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schöler H (2007) Ein Embryo ist kein Fötus und eine Zelle kein Mensch. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 11 September

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewmon A (2004) The ‘critical organ’ for the organism as a whole. In: Machado C, Shewmon A (eds) Brain death and disorders of consciousness. Kluwer, New York, pp 26–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Strain L, Warner JP, Johnston T, Bonthron DT (1995) A human parthenogenetic chimera. Nat Genet 11:164–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez A (1993) Sono l’embrione umano, il bambino con anencefalia ed il paziente in stato vegetativo persistente persone umane? Una dimostrazione razionale a partire dai movimenti spontanei. Acta Philosophica 2:105–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez A, Lang M, Huarte J (2007) DIANA Anomalies. Criteria for generating human pluripotent stem cells without embryos. Natl Cathol Bioeth Q 7:315–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez A (2011) Is this cell entity a human being? Neural activity, spiritual soul, and the status of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). In: Suarez A, Huarte J (eds) Is this cell a human being? Springer, Berlin, pp 171–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Takabashi K, Yamanaka S (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126:663–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The National Institute of Health (2001a) Stem cell report, Appendix A: Early development. http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/scireport/appendixa.asp. Cited 26 Feb 2011

  • The National Institute of Health (2001b) Stem cell report, Chapter 1: The stem cell http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/scireport/chapter1.asp. Cited 26 Feb 2011

  • Wongtawan T, Taylor JE, Lawson KA, Wilmut I, Pennings S (2011) Histone H4K20me3 and HP1 are late heterochromatin markers in development, but present in undifferentiated embryonic stem cells. J. Cell Sci 124:1878–1890

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao XY, Li W, Lv Z, Liu L, Tong M, Hai T, Hao J, Guo CL, Ma QW, Wang L, Zeng F, Zhou Q (2009) iPS cells produce viable mice through tetraploid complementation. Nature 461:86–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zwaka TP, Thomson JA (2005) A germ cell origin of embryonic stem cells? Development 132:227–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antoine Suarez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huarte, J., Suarez, A. (2011). Embryos Grown in Culture Deserve the Same Moral Status as Embryos After Implantation. In: Suarez, A., Huarte, J. (eds) Is this Cell a Human Being?. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20772-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics