Clinical Studies on the Effectiveness of Homeopathy for URTI/A (Upper Respiratory Tract Infections and Allergic Reactions)



This HTA uses systematic surveys, clinical studies and single case reports to research the effectiveness of homeopathic methods of treatment. It needs clinical studies on relevant indications for which sufficient RCTs, non-randomized prospective controlled and uncontrolled trials are available, as well as high-quality case studies.


Otitis Medium Allergic Rhinitis Acute Otitis Medium Allergic Asthma Acute Sinusitis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aabel S (2000) No beneficial effect of isopathic prophylactic treatment for birch pollen allergy during a lowpollen season: a double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial of homeopathic Betula 30c. Br Homeopathic J 89:169–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) (1992) Acute pain management: operative and medical procedures and trauma. Clinical practice guideline no 1. AHCPR Publication No. 92–0023, Appendix B. available at:
  3. Asher BFM, Seidman MM, Snyderman CM (2001) Complementary and alternative medicine in otolaryngology. Laryngoscope 111:1383–1389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bahemann A (2002) Kalium bromatum bei infektioser Mononukleose. Z Klassische Homöopathie 46:232–233Google Scholar
  5. Barnett ED, Levatin JL, Chapman EH, Floyd LA, Eisenberg D, Kaptchuk TJ et al (2000) Challenges of evaluating homeopathic treatment of acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 19:273–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bassler D, Antes G, Forster J (1998)Leitlinienbericht “Asthma bronchiale“. Ärztliche Zentralstelle für QualitätssicherungGoogle Scholar
  7. Burke P, Bain J, Robinson D, Dunn JM (1991) Acute red ear in children: controlled trial of non-antibiotic treatment in general practice. BMJ 303:558–562PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Lange de Klerk ESM, Blommers J, Kruik DJ, Bezemer PD, Feenstra L (1994) Effect of homeopathic medicines on daily burden of symptoms in children with recurrent upper respiratory tract infections. BMJ 309:1329–1332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunn JM, DeMasi JM (1997) Homeopathic-alternative medication (HAM) in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). J Allergy Clin Immunol 99:61Google Scholar
  10. Eizayaga FX, Eizayaga J (1996) Homeopathic treatment of bronchial asthma. Retrospective study of 62 cases. Br Homeopathic J 85:28–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferley JP, Zmirou D, D’Adhemar D, Balducci F (1989) A controlled evaluation of a homeopathic preparation in the treatment of influenza-like syndromes. Br J Clin Pharmacol 27:329–336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Frei H, Thurneysen A (2001) Homeopathy in acute otitis media in children: treatment effect or spontaneous resolution? Br Homeopathic J 90:180–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frenkel M HD (2002) Effects of homeopathic intervention on medication consumption in atopic and allergic disorders. Altern Ther Health Med 8:76–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Friese KH (1994) The homeopathic therapy of acute otitis media in children [in German]. Therapiewoche 44:348–353Google Scholar
  15. Friese KH (1997) Qualitätssicherung in der Homöopathie am Beispiel der adenoiden Vegetationen. Allgemeine Homöopathische Zeitung 242:68–72Google Scholar
  16. Friese KH, Kruse S, Moeller H (1996) Otitis media in children. A comparison of conventional and homeopathic drugs [in German]. HNO 44:462–466PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Friese KH, Kruse S, Moeller H (1997a) Acute otitis media in children: a comparison of conventional and homeopathic treatment. Biomed Ther 15:113–116Google Scholar
  18. Friese KH, Feuchter U, Moeller H (1997b) Homeopathic treatment of adenoid vegetations. Results of a prospective, randomized double-blind study. HNO 45:618–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Friese KH, Kruse S, Lüdtke R, Moeller H (1997c) The homeopathic treatment of otitis media in children – Comparisons with conventional therapy. International J Clin Pharmacol Therapeutics 35:296–301Google Scholar
  20. Friese KH, Feuchter U, Lüdtke R, Moeller H (2001) Results of a randomized prospective double-blind clinical trial on the homeopathic treatment of adenoid vegetations. Eur J General Practice 7:48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gassinger CA, Wunstel G, Netter P (1981) A controlled clinical trial for testing the efficacy of the homeopathic drug eupatorium perfoliatum D2 in the treatment of common cold. [German]. Arzneimittelforschung 31: 732–736PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Haidvogl M (1993) Klinische Studien zum Wirksamkeitsnachweis der Homöopathie. Dtsch Apothekerzeitung 133:1697–1705Google Scholar
  23. Harrison H., Fixsen A, Vickers A (1999) A randomized comparison of homeopathic and standard care for the treatment of glue ear in children. Complement Ther Med 7:132–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Herzberger G, Weiser M (1997) Homeopathic treatment of infections of various origins: a prospective study. Biomed Ther 15:123–127Google Scholar
  25. Jacobs J, Springer DA, Crothers D (2001) Homeopathic treatment of acute otitis media in children: A preliminary randomized placebo-controlled trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J 20:177–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kruse S (2004) Otitis media bei Kindern – Homöopathie versus konventionelle Therapie. Hippokrates Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewith GT, Watkins AD, Hyland ME, Shaw S, Broomfield JA, Dolan G, Holgate ST (2002) Use of ultramolecular potencies of allergen to treat asthmatic people allergic to house dust mite: double blind randomized controlled clinical trial. BMJ 324:520–523. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7336.520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G, Melchart D, Eitel F, Hedges LV, et al (1997) Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Lancet 350:834–843PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Linde K, Melchart D (1998) Randomized controlled trials of individualized homeopathy: a state-of-the-art review. J Altern Complement Med 4:371–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maiwald L, Weinfurtner T, Mau J, Connert WD (1988) Treatment of common cold with a combination homeopathic preparation compared with acetylsalicylic acid. Controlled randomized single-blind study. Arzneimittelforschung 38:578–582PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Matusiewicz R, Rokiewicz-Piorun A (1997) Behandlung schwerer Formen von kortikoidabhängigem Bronchialasthma mit Immunsuppressiva und antihomotoxischen Mitteln. Biol Med 26:67–72Google Scholar
  32. Mössinger P (1985) Zur Behandlung der Otitis media mit Pulsatilla. Kinderarzt 16:581–582Google Scholar
  33. Nusche M (1998) Homöopathie oder Penicilin bei Mandelentzündungen? Eine prospektive klinische Studie. Hippokrates Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  34. Ollenschläger G, Helou A, Lorenz W (2000) Kritische Bewertung von Leitlinien. In: Kunz R, Ollenschläger G, Raspe HH (eds) Lehrbuch evidenzbasierte Medizin in Klinik und Praxis. Schriftenreihe Hans Neuffer Stiftung, Deutscher ÄrzteVerlag, Köln, pp 156–176Google Scholar
  35. Papp R, Schuback G (1998) Oscillococcinum® in patients with influenza-like syndroms: a placebo-controlled double-blind evaluation. Br Homeopathic J 87:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rabe A (2001) Treatment of cough of different genesis with a modern homeopathic preparation. [in German]. Biol Med 30:234–238Google Scholar
  37. Reilly D, Taylor MA, Beattie NG, Campbell JH, McSharry C, Aitchison TC, Carter R, Stevenson R (1994) Is evidence for homeopathy reproducible? Lancet 344:1601–1606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reilly DT, McSharry C, Taylor MA, Aitchison T (1986) Is homeopathy a placebo response? Controlled trial of homeopathic potency with pollen in hay fever as model. Lancet 2:881–886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reilly DT, Taylor MA (1985) Potent placebo or potency? A proposed study model with initial findings using homeopathically prepared pollens in hayfever. Br Homeopathic J 74:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Righetti M (1988) Forschung in der Homöopathie. Grundlagen, Problematik und Ergebnisse. Burgdorf, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  41. Riley D, Fischer M, Singh B, Haidvogl M, Heger M (2001) Homeopathy and conventional medicine: an outcomes study comparing effectiveness in a primary care setting. J Altern Complement Med 7:149–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. SIGN 50 (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) (2004) A guideline developers‘ handbook (Sect. 6). Edinburgh available at:
  43. Smyrnios NA, Irwin RS, Curley FJ, French CL (1998) From a prospective study of chronic cough. Arch Intern Med 158:1222–1228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Taylor MA, Reilly D, Llewellyn-Jones RH, McSharry C, Aitchison TC (2000) Randomized controlled trial of homeopathy versus placebo in perennial allergic rhinitis with overview of four trial series. BMJ 21:471–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Walach H, Righetti M (1996) Homeopathy – foundations, research and strategies of evaluation. Wien Klin Wochenschr 108:654–663PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Weber U, Lüdtke R, Friese KH, Fischer I, Moeller H (2002) A non-randomized pilot study to compare complementary and conventional treatments of acute sinusitis. Forschende Komplementärmedizin 9:99–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weil RS (1997) Der hustende Patient in der hausärztlichen Praxis. Ther Erfolg 1:145–146Google Scholar
  48. Weiser M, Clasen P (1994) Randomisierte plazebokontrollierte Doppelblindstudie zur Untersuchung der klinischen Wirksamkeit der homöopathischen Euphorbium compositum-Nasen-tropfen S bei chronischer Sinusitis. Forschende Komplementärmedizin 1:251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weiser M Clasen P (1995) Controlled double-blind study of a homeopathic sinusitis medication. Biol Ther 13:4–11Google Scholar
  50. White A, Slade P, Hunt C, Hart A, Ernst E (2003) Individualized homeopathy as an adjunct in the treatment of childhood asthma: a randomized, placebo controlled trial. Thorax 58:317–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wiesenauer M, Gaus W (1985) Double-blind trial comparing the effectiveness of the homeopathic preparation galphimia potency D6, galphimia dilution 10–6 and placebo on pollinosis. Arzneimittelforschung 35:1745–1747PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wiesenauer M, Gaus W, Bohnacker U, Haussler S (1989) Efficiency of homeopathic preparation combinations in sinusitis. Results of a randomized double-blind study with general practitioners. [in German]. Arzneimittelforschung 39:620–625PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Zentralinstitut für kassenärztliche Versorgung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (ZKV) (1998) Die EVaS Studie. Wissenschaftliche Reihe, vol 39.1. Deutscher ÄrzteVerlag, CologneGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lörrach
  2. 2.Goslar
  3. 3.CH-La Neuveville/BE
  4. 4.Stetten Gemeinde Lörrach
  5. 5.ZürichAustria and Switzerland
  6. 6.Centre de Santé La CorbièreEstavayer-le-Lac

Personalised recommendations