Abstract
Citizen science refers to voluntary participation by the general public in scientific endeavors. Although citizen science has a long tradition, the rise of online communities and user-generated web content has the potential to greatly expand its scope and contributions. Citizens spread across a large area will collect more information than an individual researcher can. Because citizen scientists tend to make observations about areas they know well, data are likely to be very detailed. Although the potential for engaging citizen scientists is extensive, there are challenges as well. In this paper we consider one such challenge – creating an environment in which non-experts in a scientific domain can provide appropriate and accurate data regarding their observations. We describe the problem in the context of a research project that includes the development of a website to collect citizen-generated data on the distribution of plants and animals in a geographic region. We propose an approach that can improve the quantity and quality of data collected in such projects by organizing data using instance-based data structures. Potential implications of this approach are discussed and plans for future research to validate the design are described.
Keywords
- design
- citizen science
- management
- database design
- conceptual modeling
- data quality
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Silvertown, J.: A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24, 467–471 (2009)
Goodchild, M.: Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69, 211–221 (2007)
Hand, E.: People power. Nature 466, 685–687 (2010)
Foster-Smith, J., Evans, S.M.: The value of marine ecological data collected by volunteers. Biological Conservation 113, 199–213 (2003)
Flanagin, A., Metzger, M.: The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal 72, 137–148 (2008)
Wiersma, Y.F.: Birding 2.0: citizen science and effective monitoring in the Web 2.0 world. Avian Conservation and Ecology 5, 13 (2010)
Coleman, D.J., Georgiadou, Y., Labonte, J.: Volunteered geographic information: The nature and motivation of producers. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research 4, 332–358 (2009)
Parsons, J., Wand, Y.: Emancipating instances from the tyranny of classes in information modeling. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 25, 228 (2000)
Parsons, J., Lukyanenko, R., Wiersma, Y.: Easier citizen science is better. Nature 471, 37 (2011)
Dickinson, J.L., Zuckerberg, B., Bonter, D.N.: Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41, 112–149 (2010)
Aaron, W.E.G., Tudor, M.T., Haegen, W.M.V.: The Reliability of Citizen Science: A Case Study of Oregon White Oak Stand Surveys. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34, 1425–1429 (2006)
Hamel, N.J., Burger, A.E., Charleton, K., Davidson, P., Lee, S., Bertram, D.F., Parrish, J.K.: Bycatch and beached birds: Assessing mortality impacts in coastal net fisheries using marine bird strandings. Marine Ornithology (2009)
Bishr, M., Mantelas, L.: A trust and reputation model for filtering and classifying knowledge about urban growth. GeoJournal 72, 229–237 (2008)
Silvertown, J.: Taxonomy: include social networking. Nature 467, 788–788 (2010)
Komiak, S.Y.X., Benbasat, I.: The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly 30, 941–960 (2006)
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W.: Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly 27, 51–90 (2003)
Palvia, P.: The role of trust in e-commerce relational exchange: A unified model. Information & Management 46, 213–220 (2009)
Alabri, A., Hunter, J.: Enhancing the quality and trust of citizen science data. In: IEEE eScience 2010, Brisbane, Australia (2010)
Sullivan, B.L., Wood, C.L., Iliff, M.J., Bonney, R.E., Fink, D., Kelling, S.: eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biological Conservation 142, 2282–2292 (2009)
Parsons, J., Su, J.: Analysis of data structures to support the instance-based data model. In: International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST), pp. 107–130 (2006)
Parsons, J., Wand, Y.: A question of class. Nature 455, 1040–1041 (2008)
Allen, B.R., Boynton, A.C.: Information architecture: In search of efficient flexibility. MIS Quarterly 15, 435–445 (1991)
Agarwal, R., Angst, C.M.: Technology-Enabled Transformations in U.S. Health Care: Early Findings on Personal Health Records and Individual Use. In: Galletta, D., Zhang, P. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Applications. M.E. Sharpe, Inc., Armonk (2006)
Nicolaou, A.I., McKnight, D.H.: Perceived information quality in data exchanges: Effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Information Systems Research 17, 332–351 (2006)
Grill-Spector, K., Kanwisher, N.: Visual recognition. Psychological Science 16, 152–160 (2005)
Bunge, M.A.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy: The furniture of the world. Reidel, Dordrecht (1977)
Wand, Y., Weber, R.: An ontological model of an information system. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 16, 1282–1292 (1990)
Bowers, J.S., Jones, K.W.: Detecting objects is easier than categorizing them. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61, 552–557 (2008)
Wand, Y., Monarchi, D.E., Parsons, J., Woo, C.C.: Theoretical foundations for conceptual modeling in information systems development. Decision Support Systems 15, 285–304 (1995)
Raccoon, L.S.B., Puppydog, P.O.P.: A middle-out concept of hierarchy (or the problem of feeding the animals). SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 23, 111–119 (1998)
Young, J.J., Williams, P.F.: Sorting and comparing: Standard-setting and “ethical” categories. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 21, 509–521 (2010)
Lakoff, G.: Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1987)
Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M., Boyesbraem, P.: Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8, 382–439 (1976)
Murphy, G.L., Wisniewski, E.J.: Categorizing objects in isolation and in scenes - What a superordinate is good for. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning 15, 572–586 (1989)
Rorissa, A.: User-generated descriptions of individual images versus labels of groups of images: A comparison using basic level theory. Information Processing & Management 44, 1741–1753 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lukyanenko, R., Parsons, J., Wiersma, Y. (2011). Citizen Science 2.0: Data Management Principles to Harness the Power of the Crowd. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds) Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research. DESRIST 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6629. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_34
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20632-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20633-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)