Abstract
As anonymity has both positive and negative effects at the same time, it is arguable whether or not anonymity is worth preserving. However, there are few studies that seek to clarify the effects of anonymity on the society as a whole by integrating individual behaviors and macroscopic models.We propose an opinion diffusion model that introduces a ‘conviction’ dimension to represent behaviors of an anonymous agent,and investigate the way anonymity can affect the society using simulation method. Results indicate that anonymity is more effective in a society with a higher similarity threshold. In addition, increasing anonymity resulted in increasing the time to reach consensus and increasing the number of agents in the biggest cluster.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Afshar, M., Asadpour, M.: Opinion Formation by Informed Agents. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 13 (2010)
Albert, M.R.: E-Buyer Beware: Why Online Auction Fraud Should Be Regulated. American Business Law Journal 39, 575–644 (2002)
Aldashev, G., Carletti, T.: Benefits of Diversity, Communication Costs, and Public Opinion Dynamics. Complexity 15, 54–63 (2009)
Axelrod, R.: The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41, 203–226 (1997)
Balcetis, E., Dunning, D.: See What You Want to See: Motivational Influences on Visual Perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91, 612–625 (2006)
Bochner, S., Insko, C.A.: Communicator Discrepancy, Source Credibility, and Opinion Change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4, 614–621 (1966)
Brucks, M.: The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 12, 1–16 (1985)
Christopherson, K.M.: The Positive and Negative Implications of Anonymity in Internet Social Interactions: ‘On the Internet, Nobody Knows You’re a Dog’. Computers in Human Behavior 23, 3038–3056 (2007)
Corritore, C.L., Kracher, B., Wiedenbeck, S.: On-line Trust: Concepts, Evolving Themes, a Model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58, 737–758 (2003)
Davenport, D.: Anonymity on the Internet: Why the Price Be Too High. Communications of the ACM 45, 33–36 (2002)
Elliston, F.A.: Anonymity and Whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics 1, 167–177 (1982)
Hofstede, G.: National Cultures in Four Dimensions. International Studies of Man and Organization 13, 46–74 (1983)
Laguna, M.F., Abramson, G., Zanette, D.H.: Minorities in a Model for Opinion Formation. Complexity 9, 31–36 (2004)
Lea, M., Spears, R., de Groot, D.: Knowing Me, Knowing You: Anonymity Effects on Social Identity Processes within Groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27, 526–537 (2001)
Lee, E.J.: Deindividuation Effects on Group Polarization in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Role of Group Identification, Public-Self-Awareness, and Perceived Argument Quality. Journal of Communication 57, 385–403 (2007)
Mann, L.: The Baiting Crowd in Episodes of Threatened Suicide. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41, 703–709 (1981)
Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lea, M.: Breaching or Building Social Boundaries?: SIDE-Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication. Communication Research 25, 689–715 (1998)
Schlenker, B.R., Leary, M.R.: Social Anxiety and Self-Presentation: A Conceptualization and Model. Psychological Bulletin 92, 641–669 (1982)
Suler, J.: The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology& Behavior 7, 321–326 (2004)
Teich, A., Frankel, M.S., Kling, R., Lee, Y.: Anonymous Communication Policies for the Internet: Results and Recommendations of the AAAS Conference. The Information Society 15, 71–77 (1999)
Weisbuch, G., Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., Nadal, J.P.: Meet, Discuss, and Segregate! Complexity 7, 55–63 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lim, D., Zo, H., Lee, D. (2011). The Value of Anonymity on the Internet. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds) Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research. DESRIST 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6629. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_33
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20632-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20633-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)