Abstract
Theory is a central element in research. Due to the importance of theory in research, considerable efforts have been made to better understand the process of theorizing, i.e., development of a theory. A review of the literature in this area suggests that two dominant theorizing approaches are anchored to deductive and inductive reasoning respectively. In contrast, an essential part of theorizing for design may involve abductive reasoning. The purpose of design theory is not to advance declarative logic regarding truth or falseness, but to guide learning and problem solving through the conceptualization of a design artifact. This paper critically examines the process of theorizing for design by developing an idealized design theorizing framework. The framework indicates that theorizing for design operates in two distinct domains: instance and abstract. Further, four key theorizing activities are identified in this framework: abstraction, solution search, de-abstraction, and registration. The framework provides grounds for building strong design theories in the design science paradigm by explicating the underlying theorizing process for design.
Keywords
- Design Theory
- Theorizing in Design Science Research
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Winter, R.: Design science research in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems 17, 470–475 (2008)
Baskerville, R., Lyytinen, K., Sambamurthy, V., Straub, D.: A response to the design-oriented information systems research memorandum. European Journal of Information Systems 20, 11–15 (2011)
Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The anatomy of a design theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8, 312–335 (2007)
Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.A.: Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research 3, 36–59 (1992)
Sutton, R.I., Staw, B.M.: What Theory is Not. Administrative Science Quarterly 40, 371–384 (1995)
Weick, K.E.: What Theory is Not, Theorizing Is. Administrative Science Quarterly 40, 385–390 (1995)
Dubin, R.: Theory Building in Applied Areas. In: Dunnette, M.D. (ed.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Rand McNally, Chicago (1976)
Locke, E.A.: The Case for Inductive Theory Building. Journal of Management 33, 867–890 (2007)
Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review 14, 532–550 (1989)
Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Wiedenfeld and Nicholson, London (1967)
Popper, K.: The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Unwin Hyman, London (1980)
Weick, K.E.: Theory Construction As Disciplined Imagination. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review 14, 516–531 (1989)
Freese, L.: Formal Theorizing. Annual Review of Sociology 6, 187–212 (1980)
Homans, G.C.: Contemporary Theory in Sociology. In: Faris, R.E.L. (ed.) Handbook of Modern Sociology, pp. 951–977. Rand McNally, Chicago (1964)
Kaplan, A.: The conduct of inquiry. Chandler, San Francisco (1964)
Alvesson, M., Karreman, D.A.N.: Constructing Mystery: Empirical Matters In Theory Development. Academy of Management Review 32, 1265–1281 (2007)
Gergen, K.J.: Correspondence versus autonomy in the language of understanding human action. In: Fiske, D.W., Shweder, R.A. (eds.) Metatheory in Social Science, pp. 136–162. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1986)
Henshel, R.L.: Sociology and prediction. The American Sociologist 6, 213–220 (1971)
Simon, H.: The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)
Brown, T.: Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, 1–10 (June 2008)
Martin, R.: The Design of Business. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2009)
Peirce, C.S.: The Logic of Drawing History from Ancient Documents. In: Burks, A.W. (ed.) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volumes VII and VIII: Science and Philosophy and Reviews, Correspondence and Bibliography, vol. 7. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1958)
Gregor, S.: Building Theory in the Sciences of the Artificial. In: Vaishnavi, V., Purao, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology. ACM, New York (2009)
Parnas, D., Clements, P.: A rational design process: How and why to fake it. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering SE 12, 251–257 (1986)
Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J.: Explanatory Design Theory. Business & Information Systems Engineering 2, 271–282 (2010)
Goldkuhl, G.: Design Theories in Information Systems - a need for multi-grounding. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 6, 59–72 (2004)
Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: The Design Theory Nexus. MIS Quarterly 32, 731–755 (2008)
Aier, S., Fischer, C.: Criteria of progress for information systems design theories. Information Systems and E-Business Management 9, 133–172 (2011)
Kuechler, B., Vaishnavi, V.: On the theory development in design science research: Anatomy of a research project. European Journal of Information Systems 17, 489–504 (2008)
Davis, M.S.: That’s Interesting!: Towards a Phenomenology of Sociology and a Sociology of Phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 1, 309–344 (1971)
Bacharach, S.B.: Organizational theories. Academy of Management Review 14, 496–515 (1989)
Root-Bernstein, R.S.: Discovering: Inventing and Solving Problems at the Frontiers of Scientific Knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1989)
Lee, A.S., Baskerville, R.L.: Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research 14, 221–243 (2003)
Yin, R.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1994)
Kant, I.: Critique of the Power of Judgment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
Dewey, J.: How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. Heath, Lexington (1933)
Dewey, J.: Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, Troy, MO (1938)
Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28, 75–105 (2004)
March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15, 251–266 (1995)
Vaishnavi, V.K., Kuechler, W.: Research patterns: Improving and innovating information & communication technology. Auerbach Publications, New York (2007)
Gregor, S.: The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly 30, 611–642 (2006)
Pries-Heje, J., Vinter, O.: A Framework for Selecting Change Strategies in IT Organizations. In: Münch, J., Vierimaa, M. (eds.) PROFES 2006. LNCS, vol. 4034, pp. 408–414. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Carroll, J.M., Kellogg, W.A.: Artifact as theory-nexus: hermeneutics meets theory-based design. In: ACM SIGCHI Bulletin–Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Wings for the Mind, vol. 20, pp. 7–14 (1989)
Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: Improving Software Organizations: An Analysis of Diverse Normative Models. In: Messnarz, R. (ed.) Proceedings of European Software Process Improvement 2003, pp. X.23–X.39. Verlag der Teknischen Universität Graz, Graz (2003)
Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: A design theory for managing software process improvement. In: Vaishanvi, V., Purao, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, pp. 1–2. ACM, New York (2009)
Aaen, I.: Essence: facilitating software innovation. European Journal of Information Systems 17, 543–553 (2008)
Baskerville, R.L., Pries-Heje, J.: Design and management. In: Simonsen, J., Bærenholdt, J.O., Büscher, M., Scheuer, J.D. (eds.) Design Research: Synergies from Interdisciplinary Perspectives, pp. 63–78. Routledge, London (2010)
Isenberg, D.J.: Thinking and Managing: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Managerial Problem Solving. The Academy of Management Journal 29, 599–775 (1986)
Ericsson, K.A., Simon, H.A.: Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)
McAllister, J.W.: The evidential significance of thought experiment in science. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27, 233–250 (1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lee, J.S., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R. (2011). Theorizing in Design Science Research. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds) Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research. DESRIST 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6629. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20632-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20633-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)