Skip to main content

Survivor Personality Traits

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
How Leading Lawyers Think
  • 1204 Accesses

Abstract

Survivors of catastrophic events are amalgams of flexibility, adaptability, resiliency, realism, inquisitiveness, creativity, tolerance for ambiguity, independence and intuition. These survivor traits – and the study attorneys’ application of these traits to litigation – are the subject of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Siebert, Al. (1996). The survivor personality (p. 5). New York: Penguin Group.

  2. 2.

    Blake, John. (2008, September 8). Miraculous survivors: Why they live while others die. CNN. Available at http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/09/08/survive/index.html.

  3. 3.

    Id.

  4. 4.

    Gonzales, Laurence. (2003). Deep survival: Who lives, who dies and why (p. 25). New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

  5. 5.

    Id. at 27.

  6. 6.

    Siebert supra note 1 at 186.

  7. 7.

    Siebert supra note 1 at 190.

  8. 8.

    Gonzales supra note 4 at 24.

  9. 9.

    Gonzales supra note 4 at 167, 168, 196, 212. Ripley, Amanda (2008). The unthinkable: Who survives when disaster strikes (pp. 8, 16). New York: Three Rivers Press.

  10. 10.

    Ripley supra note 9 at 64, 74, 78.

  11. 11.

    Ripley supra note 9 at 71–72.

  12. 12.

    Gonzales supra note 4 at 218.

  13. 13.

    Gonzales supra note 4 at 289.

  14. 14.

    Siebert supra note 1 at 30.

  15. 15.

    Ripley supra note 9 at 91.

  16. 16.

    Gonzales supra note 4 at 280.

  17. 17.

    Siebert supra note 1 at 33. See Tucker, John C. (2003). Trial and error: The education of a courtroom lawyer (p. 148). New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers. (“Of all the mistakes made even by experienced trial lawyers the most common is failure to adjust to changing circumstances in the heat of battle. Time and again, lawyers plow ahead with questions they had planned to ask on cross-examination even though a witness’s previous answer has rendered the planned questions unnecessary, or even dangerous. Concentrating on their planned attack, it is as though they had been rendered blind and deaf.”)

  18. 18.

    Norman, Donald. (2007). The design of future things (p. 13). New York: Basic Books.

  19. 19.

    Ball, David. (2005). David Ball on damages (p. 364). Louisville, Colorado: National Institute of Trial Advocacy.

  20. 20.

    Siebert supra note 1 at 78.

  21. 21.

    See Smock, Charles. (1957, March). The relationship between “intolerance of ambiguity,” generalization and speed of perceptual closure. Child Development, 28(1), 27–36. Levitt, Eugene E. (1953, September-December). Studies in intolerance of ambiguity: I. The decision-location test with grade school children. Child Development 24, (3/4), 263–268.

  22. 22.

    Siebert supra note 1 at 79.

  23. 23.

    See Eiduson, Bernice T., & Beckman, Linda (Eds.). (1973). Science as a career choice: Theoretical and empirical studies (pp. 244–245). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  24. 24.

    Siebert supra note 1 at 20.

  25. 25.

    Andreasen, Nancy C. (2006). The creative brain (p. 101). New York: Penguin Group.

  26. 26.

    Simonton, Dean Keith. (1999). Origins of genius (p. 92). New York: Oxford University Press.

  27. 27.

    Proulx, G., & Fahy, R.F. (2004). Account analysis of WTC survivors. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Human Behaviour in Fire, Belfast, UK, September 01–03, 2004, pp. 203–214, (NRCC-47309).

  28. 28.

    Gonzales supra note 4 at 174.

  29. 29.

    Krieger, Stefan H., & Neumann, Richard K. (2007). Essential lawyering skills, (p. 31). New York: Aspen Publishers.

  30. 30.

    Siebert supra note 1 at 95–99. Gonzales supra note 4 at 85.

  31. 31.

    Oney, Stephen. (2010, November 12). The defiant ones. The Wall Street Journal, p. D1.

  32. 32.

    Siebert supra note 1 at 98.

  33. 33.

    Gonzales supra note 4 at 174.

  34. 34.

    Myers, David (2004). Intuition: Its powers and perils (p. 1). New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.

  35. 35.

    Siebert supra note 1 at 66.

  36. 36.

    Gonzales supra note 4 at 122.

  37. 37.

    Gonzales supra note 4 at 124.

  38. 38.

    Gonzales supra note 4 at 123.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randall Kiser .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kiser, R. (2011). Survivor Personality Traits. In: How Leading Lawyers Think. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20484-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics