Advertisement

Dependency of Resolvable Gravitational Spatial Resolution on Space-Borne Observation Techniques

  • P. N. A. M. VisserEmail author
  • E. J. O. Schrama
  • N. Sneeuw
  • M. Weigelt
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 136)

Abstract

The so-called Colombo-Nyquist (Colombo, The global mapping of gravity with two satellites, 1984) rule in satellite geodesy has been revisited. This rule predicts that for a gravimetric satellite flying in a (near-)polar circular repeat orbit, the maximum resolvable geopotential spherical harmonic degree (l max) is equal to half the number of orbital revolutions (n r) the satellite completes in one repeat period. This rule has been tested for different observation types, including geoid values at sea level along the satellite ground track, orbit perturbations (radial, along-track, cross-track), low-low satellite-to-satellite tracking, and satellite gravity gradiometry observations (all three diagonal components). Results show that the Colombo–Nyquist must be reformulated. Simulations indicate that the maximum resolvable degree is in fact equal to kn r + 1, where k can be equal to 1, 2, or even 3 depending on the combination of observation types. However, the original rule is correct to some extent, considering that the quality of recovered gravity field models is homogeneous as a function of geographical longitude as long as l max < n r/2.

Keywords

Gravity Field Spherical Harmonic Normal Matrix Repeat Period Repeat Orbit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bender PL, Wiese DN, Nerem RS (2008) A possible dual-GRACE mission with 90 degree and 63 degree inclination orbits. In: ESA (ed) 3rd International symposium on formation flying, missions and technologies, 23–25 April 2008, ESA/ESTEC, Noordwijk, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  2. Colombo OL (1984) The global mapping of gravity with two satellites, vol 7, no 3, Publications on geodesy, New Series. Netherlands Geodetic Commission, DelftGoogle Scholar
  3. Reubelt T, Sneeuw N, Sharifi MA (2010) Future Mission Design Options for Spatio-Temporal Geopotential Recovery. International Association of Geodesy Symposia. Vol. 135, Springer, pp 163–170Google Scholar
  4. Schrama EJO (1990) Gravity field error analysis: applications of GPS receivers and gradiometers on low orbiting platforms, NASA technical memorandum 100679. GSFC, Greenbelt, MDGoogle Scholar
  5. Schrama EJO (1991) Gravity field error analysis: applications of GPS receivers and gradiometers on low orbiting platforms. J Geophys Res 96(B12):20041–20051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Sneeuw N (2000) A semi-analytical approach to gravity field analysis from satellite observations. PhD dissertation, Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Reihe C, Nr. 527Google Scholar
  7. Visser PNAM (1992) The use of satellites in gravity field determination and model adjustment. PhD dissertation, Delft University of Technology, DelftGoogle Scholar
  8. Visser PNAM (2005) Low-low satellite-to-satellite tracking: applicability of analytical linear orbit perturbation theory. J Geod 79(1–3):160–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Visser PNAM, Schrama EJO (2005) Space-borne gravimetry: how to decouple the different gravity field constituents? In: Jekeli C et al (eds) Gravity, geoid and space missions, vol 129, International association of geodesy symposia. Springer, Berlin, pp 6–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Visser PNAM, Wakker KF, Ambrosius BAC (1994) Global gravity field recovery from the ARISTOTELES satellite mission. J Geophys Res 99(B2):2841–2851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Visser PNAM, van den IJssel J, Koop R, Klees R (2001) Exploring gravity field determination from orbit perturbations of the European Gravity Mission GOCE. J Geod 75(2/3):89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Visser PNAM, Sneeuw N, Gerlach C (2003) Energy integral method for gravity field determination from satellite orbit coordinates. J Geod 77(3/4):207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. N. A. M. Visser
    • 1
    Email author
  • E. J. O. Schrama
    • 1
  • N. Sneeuw
    • 2
  • M. Weigelt
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft Institute of Earth Observation and Space Systems (DEOS)Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institute of GeodesyUniversity of StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations