Skip to main content

Local and Regional Comparisons of Gravity and Magnetic Fields

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Geodesy for Planet Earth

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 136))

  • 1900 Accesses

Abstract

A long recognized connection between the gravitational gradients of the Earth’s crust and its magnetic anomalies, known as Poisson’s relationship, is the object of investigation in this paper. We develop the mathematical and theoretical basis of this relationship in both the space and frequency domains. Anomalies of the magnetic field thus implied by the gravitational gradients (or other derivatives of the gravitational potential) are called pseudo-magnetic anomalies; and, they assume a linear relationship between the mass density of the source material and its magnetization induced by the Earth’s main magnetic field. Tests in several regions of the U.S. that compare gravitational gradients derived from the high-resolution model, EGM08, and a continental magnetic anomaly data base reveal that the correlation implied by Poisson’s relationship is not consistent. Some areas exhibit high positive correlation at various frequencies, while others have even strong negative correlation. Therefore, useful applications of Poisson’s relationship depend on the validity of the underlying assumptions that, conversely, may also be investigated and studied using a combination of gradiometric and magnetic data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 469.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomag/WMM/DoDWMM.shtml.

References

  • Ates A, Keary P (1995) A new method for determining magnetization direction from gravity and magnetic anomalies: application to the deep structure of the Worcester Graben. J Geol Soc 152:561–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baranov V (1957) A new method for interpretation of aeromagnetic maps: Pseudo-gravimetric anomalies. Geophysics 22:359–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briden JC, Clark RA, Fairhead JD (1982) Gravity and magnetic studies in the Channel Islands. J Geol Soc 139:35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dindi EW, Swain CJ (1988) Joint three-dimensional inversion of gravity and magnetic data from Jombo Hill alkaline complex, Kenya. J Geol Soc 145:493–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedi M (1989) On the quantitative interpretation of magnetic anomalies by pseudo-gravimetric integration. Terra Nova 1:564–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn PJ (1975) Linear transformations of gravity and magnetic fields. Geophys Prospect 23:300–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jekeli C, Erkan K, Huang O (2008) Gravity vs pseudo-Gravity: a comparison based on magnetic and gravity gradient measurements. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Gravity Geoid and Earth Observations, GGEO2008, 23–27 July 2008, Chania, Greece, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingele EE, Marson I, Kahle H-G (1991) Automatic interpretation of gravity gradiometric data in two dimensions: vertical gradient. Geophys Prospect 39:407–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North American Magnetic Anomaly Group (NAMAG) (2002): Magnetic anomaly map of North America. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, and Factor JK (2008) An earth gravitational model to Degree 2160: EGM2008. Presented at the General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union, Vienna, Austria, April 13–18, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Poisson SD (1826) Mémoire sur la théorie du magnétisme. Mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences de l’Institut de, France, pp 247–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Telford WM, Geldart LP, Sheriff RE (1990) Applied geophysics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Jekeli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jekeli, C., Huang, O., Abt, T.L. (2012). Local and Regional Comparisons of Gravity and Magnetic Fields. In: Kenyon, S., Pacino, M., Marti, U. (eds) Geodesy for Planet Earth. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 136. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20338-1_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics