Interactive Evolution for Designing Motion Variants

  • Jonathan Eisenmann
  • Matthew Lewis
  • Bryan Cline
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 343)

Abstract

We present an intuitive method for novice users to interactively design custom populations of stylized, heterogeneous motion, from one input motion. The user sets up lattice deformers which are used by a genetic algorithm to manipulate the animation channels of the input motion and create new motion variants. Our interactive evolutionary design environment allows the user to traverse the available space of possibilities, presents the user with populations of motion, and gradually converges to a satisfactory set of solutions. Each generated motion can undergo a filtering process subject to user-specified, high-level metrics to produce a result crafted to fit the designer’s interest. We demonstrate application to both character animation and particle systems.

Keywords

Evolutionary design Animation Interaction techniques Crowds Particle systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sims, K.: Evolving 3d morphology and behavior by competition. Artificial Life 1(4), 353–372 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gritz, L., Hahn, J.K.: Genetic programming for articulated figure motion. Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation 6, 129–142 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sims, K.: Interactive evolution of equations for procedural models. The Visual Computer 9(8), 466–476 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lim, I.S., Thalmann, D.: Tournament selection for browsing temporal signals. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Applied Computing 2000, pp. 570–573. ACM, New York (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lim, I.S., Thalmann, D.: Pro-actively interactive evolution for computer animation. In: Proceedings of Computer Animation and Simulation 1999, pp. 45–52 (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ventrella, J.: Disney meets darwin-the evolution of funny animated figures. Computer Animation (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marks, J., et al.: Design galleries: a general approach to setting parameters for computer graphics and animation. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1997, pp. 389–400. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lewis, M.: Evolutionary visual art and design. In: Romero, J., Machado, P. (eds.) The Art of Artificial Evolution: A Handbook on Evolutionary Art and Music, pp. 3–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Amaya, K., Bruderlin, A., Calvert, T.: Emotion from motion. In: Graphics Interface 1996, pp. 222–229 (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sung, M.: Continuous motion graph for crowd simulation. In: Hui, K.-c., Pan, Z., Chung, R.C.-k., Wang, C.C.L., Jin, X., Göbel, S., Li, E.C.-L. (eds.) EDUTAINMENT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4469, pp. 202–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chi, D., Costa, M., Zhao, L., Badler, N.: The emote model for effort and shape. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2000, pp. 173–182. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neff, M., Fiume, E.: Aer: aesthetic exploration and refinement for expressive character animation. In: Proceedings of SCA 2005, pp. 161–170. ACM Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, J., Drucker, S.M., Agrawala, M., Cohen, M.F.: The cartoon animation filter. ACM Transactions on Graphics 25(3), 1169–1173 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gleicher, M.: Comparing constraint-based motion editing methods. Graphical Models 63(2), 107–134 (2001)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kwon, T., Lee, K.H., Lee, J., Takahashi, S.: Group motion editing. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2008, pp. 1–8. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Treuille, A., Cooper, S., Popovic, Z.: Continuum crowds. ACM Transactions on Graphics 25(3), 1160–1168 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li, T.Y., Wang, C.C.: An evolutionary approach to crowd simulation. Autonomous Robots and Agents, 119–126 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sung, M., Kovar, L., Gleicher, M.: Fast and accurate goal-directed motion synthesis for crowds. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Computer Animation 2005, pp. 291–300. ACM Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Musse, S.R., Thalmann, D.: Hierarchical model for real time simulation of virtual human crowds. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 7(2), 152–164 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Massive Software: Massive prime (2009), www.massivesoftware.com/prime
  21. 21.
    Sims, K.: Artificial evolution for computer graphics. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1991, vol. 25, pp. 319–328. ACM Press, New York (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hastings, E.J., Guha, R.K., Stanley, K.O.: Neat particles: Design, representation, and animation of particle system effects. In: IEEE CIG 2007 (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hastings, E.J., Guha, R.K., Stanley, K.O.: Interactive evolution of particle systems for computer graphics and animation. Trans. Evol. Comp. 13(2), 418–432 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bezirtzis, B.G., Lewis, M., Christeson, C.: Interactive evolution for industrial design. In: C&C 2007:Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity & Cognition, pp. 183–192. ACM, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tufte, E.R.: Envisioning Information. Graphics Press (May 1990)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sederberg, T.W., Parry, S.R.: Free-form deformation of solid geometric models. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1986, vol. 20(4), pp. 151–160 (1986)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tak, S., Song, O.Y., Ko, H.S.: Spacetime sweeping: An interactive dynamic constraints solver. In: Proceedings of Computer Animation 2002, pp. 261–271. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2002)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Müller, A.: Collision avoiding continuation method for the inverse kinematics of redundant manipulators. In: Proceedings of Robotics and Automation 2004, vol. 2, pp. 1593–1598 (2004)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mcdonnell, R., Larkin, M., Dobbyn, S., Collins, S., O’Sullivan, C.: Clone attack! perception of crowd variety. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2008, vol. 27, pp. 1–8. ACM Press, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kovar, L., Gleicher, M., Pighin, F.: Motion graphs. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2002, vol. 21, pp. 473–482. ACM Press, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ko, H., Badler, N.I.: Animating human locomotion with inverse dynamics. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 16(2), 50–59 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Eisenmann
    • 1
  • Matthew Lewis
    • 2
  • Bryan Cline
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science & EngineeringThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusU.S.A.
  2. 2.Advanced Computing Center for the Arts & DesignThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations