Advertisement

Multistability and Hysteresis-Based Mechanism of Pattern Formation in Biology

Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics book series (PROM, volume 15)

Abstract

Multistability plays an important role in cell signalling. Coupled with the diffusion process, it may give rise to spatial patterns in chemical and biological systems. Such processes lead to nonlinear dynamical models with multiple steady states, which differ from the usual reaction–diffusion systems. To investigate mechanism of pattern formation based on these concepts we propose a model consisting of a reaction–diffusion equation coupled with an ordinary differential equation. The test organism for mathematical modelling is a fresh-water polyp Hydra. The model considered here is a minimal version of the receptor-based model with multistability proposed by Marciniak-Czochra (Math Biosci 199:97–119, 2006). It describes the dynamics of nonlinear intracellular signalling coupled to cell-to-cell communication via diffusive molecules and shows how bistability and hysteresis in the kinetic system may result in spatial patterning. In particular, it is shown that multistability without the hysteresis effect is not enough for creation of stable patterns. Biologically, this model explains results of experiments such as grafting which are not easily explicable by the pure reaction–diffusion (Turing type) patterning.

Notes

Acknowledgement

A. M.-C. and A. K. were supported by European Research Council Starting Grant 210680 “Biostruct” and Emmy Noether Programme of German Research Council (DFG).

References

  1. 1.
    Holstein TW, Hobmayer E, Technau U (2003) Cnidarians: an evolutionary conserved model system for regeneration? Dev Dyn 226:257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murray JD (2003) Mathematical biology, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gierer A, Meinhardt H (1972) A theory of biological pattern formation. Kybernetik 12:30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baker RE, Schnell S, Maini PK (2009) Waves and patterning in developmental biology: vertebrate segmentation and feather bud formation as case studies. Int J Dev Biol 53:783–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guder C, Pinho S, Nacak TG, Schmidt HA, Hobmayer B, Niehrs C, Holstein TW (2006) An ancient Wnt-Dickkopf antagonism in Hydra. Development 133:901–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hobmayer B, Rentzsch F, Kuhn K, Happel CM, Laue CC, Snyder P, Rothbacher U, Holstein TW (2000) Wnt signaling and axis formation in the diploblastic metazoan Hydra. Nature 407:186–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Müller S.C, Venzl G (1984) Lecture notes in biomathematics. In: Jäger W, Murray J (eds) Modeling of patterns in space and time. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 254Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Augustin R, Franke A, Khalturin K, Kiko R, Siebert S, Hemmrich G, Bosch TC (2006) Dickkopf related genes are components of the positional value gradient in Hydra. Dev Biol 296:62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kestler HA, Kühl M (2011) Generating a Wnt switch: it’s all about the right dosage. J Cell Biol 193:431–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kreuger J, Perez L, Giraldez AJ, Cohen SM (2004) Opposing activities of Dally-like glypican at high and low levels of Wingless morphogen activity. Dev Cell 7:503–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mao B, Niehrs C (2003) Kremen2 modulates Dickkopf2 activity during Wnt/LRP6 signaling. Gene 302:179–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marciniak-Czochra A (2006) Receptor-based models with hysteresis for pattern formation in hydra. Math Biosci 199:97–119MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smoller J (1994) Shock waves and reaction–diffusion equations, vol 258, 2nd edn, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer, New YorkMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marciniak-Czochra A (2003) Receptor-based models with diffusion-driven instability for pattern formation in hydra. J Biol Syst 11:293–324MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heinze S, Schweizer B (2005) Creeping fronts in degenerate reaction–diffusion systems. Nonlinearity 18:2455–2476MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sha W, Moore J, Chen K, Lassaletta AD, Yi CS, Tyson JJ, Sible JC (2003) Hysteresis drives cell-cycle transitions in Xenopus laevis egg extracts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:975–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Novak B, Pataki Z, Ciliberto A, Tyson JJ (2001) Mathematical model of the cell division cycle of fission yeast. Chaos 11:277–286MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cross FR, Archambault V, Miller M, Klovstad M (2002) Testing a mathematical model of the yeast cell cycle. Mol Biol Cell 13:52–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hoppensteadt F, Jäger W, Pöppe C (1983) A hysteresis model for bacterial growth patterns. In: Levin S (ed) Modelling of patterns in space and time, Lecture notes in biomathematics. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marciniak-Czochra A, Ptashnyk M (2008) Derivation of a macroscopic receptor-based model using homogenisation techniques. SIAM J Math Anal 40:215–237MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marciniak-Czochra A (2012) Strong two-scale convergence and corrector result for the receptor-based model of the intercellular communication. IMA J Appl Math, DOI: 10.1093/imamat/HXS052Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Umulis DM, Serpe M, O’Connor MB, Othmer HG (2006) Robust, bistable patterning of the dorsal surface of the Drosophila embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:11613–11618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wolpert L (1969) Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. J Theor Biol 25:1–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meinhardt H (1993) A model for pattern formation of hypostome, tentacles and foot in hydra: how to form structures close to each other, how to form them at a distance. Dev Biol 157:321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Klika V, Baker RE, Headon D, Gaffney EA (2012) The influence of receptor-mediated interactions on reaction–diffusion mechanisms of cellular self-organisation. Bull Math Biol. doi: 10.1007/s11538-011-9699-4
  26. 26.
    Kusserow A, Pang K, Sturm C, Hrouda M, Lentfer J, Schmidt HA, Technau U, von Haeseler A, Hobmayer B, Martindale MQ, Holstein TW (2005) Unexpected complexity of the Wnt gene family in a sea anemone. Nature 433:156–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lee PN, Pang K, Matus DQ, Martindale MQ (2006) A WNT of things to come: evolution of Wnt signaling and polarity in cnidarians. Semin Cell Dev Biol 17:157–167MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mazieres J, He B, You L, Xu Z, Jablons DM (2005) Wnt signaling in lung cancer. Cancer Lett 222:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    W.A.Müller (1993). Pattern control in hydra: basic experiments and concepts. In Experimental and Theoretical Advances in Biological Pattern Formation, New York, Plenum PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interdisciplinary Center of Scientific Computing (IWR) and BIOQUANTUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations