Multilingual Log Analysis: LogCLEF

  • Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio
  • Johannes Leveling
  • Thomas Mandl
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6611)

Abstract

The current lack of recent and long-term query logs makes the verifiability and repeatability of log analysis experiments very limited. A first attempt in this direction has been made within the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum in 2009 in a track named LogCLEF which aims to stimulate research on user behaviour in multilingual environments and promote standard evaluation collections of log data. We report on similarities and differences of the most recent activities for LogCLEF.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Korolova, A., Kenthapadi, K., Mishra, N., Ntoulas, A.: Releasing search queries and clicks privately. In: Quemada, J., León, G., Maarek, Y.S., Nejdl, W. (eds.) WWW, pp. 171–180. ACM, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clough, P., Berendt, B.: Report on the TrebleCLEF query log analysis workshop 2009. SIGIR Forum 43, 71–77 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mandl, T., Agosti, M., Di Nunzio, G.M., Yeh, A.S., Mani, I., Doran, C., Schulz, J.M.: LogCLEF 2009: The CLEF 2009 multilingual logfile analysis track overview. In: [14], pp. 508–517Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghorab, M.R., Leveling, J., Zhou, D., Jones, G.J.F., Wade, V.: Identifying common user behaviour in multilingual search logs. In: [14], pp. 518–525Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lamm, K., Mandl, T., Koelle, R.: Search path visualization and session performance evaluation with log files. In: [14], pp. 538–543Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bosca, A., Dini, L.: Language identification strategies for cross language information retrieval. In: [13], p. 100Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stiller, J., Gäde, M., Petras, V.: Ambiguity of queries and the challenges for query language detection. In: [13], p. 99Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Takaku, M., Egusa, Y., Saito, H., Kando, N., Terai, H., Miwa, M.: CRES at LogCLEF 2010: Towards understanding the user behaviors through an analysis of search sessions, search units and click ranks. In: [13], p. 103Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leveling, J., Ghorab, M.R., Magdy, W., Jones, G.J.F., Wade, V.: DCU-TCD@LogCLEF 2010: Re-ranking document collections and query performance estimation. In: [13], p. 101Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lana-Serrano, S., Villena-Román, J., Cristóbal, J.C.G.: DAEDALUS at LogCLEF 2010: Analyzing the success of search queries. In: [13], p. 102Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Verberne, S., Hinne, M., van der Heijden, M., Hoenkamp, E., Kraaij, W., van der Weide, T.P.: How does the library searcher behave? A contrastive study of library search against ad-hoc search. In: [13], p. 99Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Perea-Ortega, J.M., Ráez, A.M., Cumbreras, M.A.G., López, L.A.U.: SINAI at LogCLEF 2010. In: [13], p. 100Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Braschler, M., Harman, D., Pianta, E. (eds.): CLEF 2010 Labs and Workshops. Abstracts Notebook Papers, CLEF 2010, September 22-23. University of Padua, Italy (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peters, C., Di Nunzio, G.M., Kurimo, M., Mostefa, D., Peñas, A., Roda, G. (eds.): CLEF 2009. LNCS, vol. 6241. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio
    • 1
  • Johannes Leveling
    • 2
  • Thomas Mandl
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Information EngineeringUniversity of PaduaItaly
  2. 2.Centre for Next Generation Localisation (CNGL)Dublin City UniversityIreland
  3. 3.Information ScienceUniversity of HildesheimGermany

Personalised recommendations