Taking a Hard Look at the Task-Based Approach: Do Learners’ Speaking Skills Really Develop and if So, How?

  • Melanie EllisEmail author
Part of the Second Language Learning and Teaching book series (SLLT)


This paper examines the development of speaking skills through the use of a task-based approach with first year undergraduates at B2 level in English. A case study was made to describe how learner spoken output changed over a semester with regard to fluency. Three different areas: description of people, description of places and narrative, were introduced through the use of a variety of tasks. After learners attempted the tasks there was a focus on form based on learner questions, mistakes noted and suggestions from the teacher. Learners then repeated the tasks. After 3 weeks learners were assessed on the same monologic task and on a new interactive task. At the end of the semester learners performed three new monologic tasks, one in each of the areas covered. On the basis of recordings, a comparison is made between language highlighted during the focus on form stages of the task cycle and language used by the learners during the assessed tasks. Particular attention is given to formulaic expressions and lexicalized chunks and fluency. Learner introspection on what they noted down during the lessons, what their personal goals were and how they prepared for the assessment, obtained through questionnaires, helps to interpret the findings. In this way, insight is gained into whether in fact a task-based approach encourages input to become intake. The learner reflections on their learning during both the task-based approach and the assessed tasks adds a new perspective to the existing research on tasks.


Final Test Repeated Task Summative Assessment Progress Test Great Fluency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Breen, M. and C. Candlin. 1980. The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics 1: 89–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bygate, M. 2001. Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In Researching pedagogic tasks, eds. M. Bygate, P. Skehan and M. Swain, 23–48. Harlow: Pearson EducationGoogle Scholar
  3. Coulmas, F. 1979. On the sociolinguistic relevance of routine formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 3: 239–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ellis, N. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 143–188.Google Scholar
  5. Ellis, R. 2003. Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Krashen, S. D. 1981. Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  7. Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Norris, J. M. and L. Ortega. 2000. Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50: 417–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Peters, A. M. 1983. Units of language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Robinson, P. 2001. Task complexity, task difficulty and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics 22: 27–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schmidt, R. 2001. Attention. In Cognition in second language instruction, ed. P. Robinson, 3–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Segalowicz, N. and E. Gatbonton. 2005. Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on access to fluency. Canadian Modern Language Review 61: 325–353.Google Scholar
  13. Skehan, P. 1998. A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Wray, A. 2008. Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teacher Training CollegeZabrzePoland

Personalised recommendations