Advertisement

Some Methodological Issues in Second-Language Speech Research: Participant Selection and Experimental Design

  • Arkadiusz RojczykEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Second Language Learning and Teaching book series (SLLT)

Abstract

The paper discusses selected methodological issues in second-language speech research. It concentrates more specifically on participant selection and experimental designs used in speech research. It begins by discussing variables in the selection of bilingual participants. These variables have been demonstrated to influence performance of bilingual subjects relative to monolingual subjects in various linguistic tasks. Subsequently, it proceeds to juxtapose two most often used experimental designs in studies on bilingual speech production: ratings by native judges and acoustic analysis. Both of these methods are critically reviewed with reference to their applicability and reliability in second-language speech research.

Keywords

Native Speaker Acoustic Analysis Voice Onset Time Late Learner Vowel Quality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adank, P, R. Smits and R. van Hout. 2004. A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116: 3099–3107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Best, C. T. 1995. A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In: Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, ed. W. Strange, 171–204. Timonium: York Press.Google Scholar
  3. Best, C. T. and M. D. Tyler. 2007. Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementaries. In: Language experience in second language speech learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege, eds. O-S. Bohn and M. Munro, 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  4. Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  5. Bongaerts, T., C. van Summeren, B. Planken and E. Schils. 1997. Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 447–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradlow, A. R., L. C. Nygaard and D. B. Pisoni. 1999. Effects of talker, rate, and amplitude variation on recognition memory for spoken words. Perception and Psychophysics 61: 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brennan, E. M. and J. S. Brennan. 1981. Accent scaling and language attitudes: Reactions to Mexican American Speech. Language and Speech 24: 207–221.Google Scholar
  8. Butler, Y. G. and K. Hakuta. 2004. Bilingualism and second language acquisition. In: The handbook of bilingualism, eds. K. Bhatia and W. C. Ritchie, 114–144. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Catford, J. C. and D. B. Pisoni. 1970. Auditory vs. articulatory training in exotic sounds. Modern Language Journal 54: 477–481.Google Scholar
  10. Cebrian, J. 2006. Experience and the use of non-native duration in L2 vowel categorization. Journal of Phonetics 34: 372–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole, J., G. Linebaugh, C. M. Munson and B. McMurray. 2010. Unmasking the acoustic effects of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: A statistical modeling approach. Journal of Phonetics 38: 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Derwing, T. M., M. J. Munro and R. I. Thomson. 2008. A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics 29: 359–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., M. Wrembel and M. Kul, eds. 2010. Proceedings from the Sixth International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech. (CD ROM version).Google Scholar
  14. Elliott, R. E. 1995. Field independence/dependence, hemispheric specialization, and attitude in relation to pronunciation accuracy in Spanish as a foreign language. Modern Language Journal 79: 356–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Escudero, P., T. Benders and S. C. Lipski. 2009. Native, non-native and L2 perceptual cue weighting for Dutch vowels: The case of Dutch, German, and Spanish listeners. Journal of Phonetics 37: 452–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fishman, J. A. 1977. The social science perspective. In: Bilingual education: Current perspectives. Social science, 1–49. Arlington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  17. Flege, J. E. 1995. Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In: Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, ed. W. Strange, 233–277. Timonium: York Press.Google Scholar
  18. Flege, J. E. 1988. Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in English sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84: 700–79.Google Scholar
  19. Flege, J. E. 2010. “Age” effects on second language acquisition. In: Proceedings from the Sixth International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, eds. K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, M. Wrembel and M. Kul. (CD ROM version).Google Scholar
  20. Flege, J. E., M. J. Munro and R. A. Fox. 1994. Auditory and categorical effects on cross-language vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97: 3125–3134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flege, J. E., M. J. Munro and I. R. A. MacKay. 1995. Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97: 3125–3134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fowler, C. A. 1984. Segmentation of coarticulated speech in perception. Perception and Psychophysics 36: 359–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gick, B., B. Bernhardt, P. Bacsfalvi and I. Wilson. 2008. Ultrasound imaging applications in second language acquisition. In: Phonology and second language acquisition, eds. J. G. Hansen Edwards and M. L. Zampini, 309–322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  24. Grosjean, F. 1982. Life with two languages: An introduction to bilingualism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Grosjean, F. 2004. Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. In: The handbook of bilingualism, eds. K. Bhatia and W. C. Ritchie, 32–63. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Hakuta, K. 1986. Mirror of language: The debate on bilingualism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. Haugen, E. 1953. The Norwegian language in America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  28. Herdina, P. and U. Jessner. 2000. A dynamic model of multilingualism: Changing the psycholinguistic perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  29. Iverson, P. and B. G. Evans. 2009. Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126: 866–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jacquemot, C. and S. K. Scott. 2006. What is the relationship between phonological short-term memory and speech processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10: 480–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kappes, J., A. Baumgaertner, C. Peschke and W. Ziegler. 2009. Unintended imitation in word repetition. Brain and Language 111: 140–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kiefte, M., T. Enright and L. Marshall. 2010. The role of formant amplitude in the perception of /i/ and /u/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127: 2611–2621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kondaurova, M. and A. Francis. 2008. The relationship between native allophonic experience with vowel duration and perception of the English tense/lax vowel contrast by Spanish and Russian listeners. Journal of the Acoustical society of America 124: 3959–3971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lambert, W. E. 1974. Culture and language as factors in learning and education. In: Cultural factors in learning and education, eds. F. F. Aboud and R. D. Meade, 91–122. Bellingham: Western Washington State University.Google Scholar
  35. Lenneberg, E. H. 1967. Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Levelt, W. J. M., A. Roelofs and A. S. Meyer. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 1–75.Google Scholar
  37. Levi, S. V., S. J. Winters and D. B. Pisoni. 2007. Speaker-independent factors affecting the perception of foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121: 2327–2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Luce, P. A. and C. T. McLennan. 2005. Spoken word recognition: The challenge of variation. In: The handbook of speech perception, eds. D. Pisoni and R. Remez, 591–609. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. MacLeod, A. A. N., C. Stoel-Gammon and A. B. Wassink. 2009. Production of high vowels in Canadian English and Canadian French: A comparison of early bilingual and monolingual speakers. Journal of Phonetics 37: 374–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morrison, G. S. 2008. L1-Spanish speakers’ acquisition of the English /i/I/contrast: Duration-based perception is not the initial developmental stage. Language and Speech 51: 285–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moyer, A. 1999. Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21: 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Munro, M. J., T. M. Derwing and C. S. Burgess. 2010. Detection of nonnative speaker status from content-masked speech. Speech Communication 52: 626–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nearey, T. M. and P. Assmann. 1986. Modeling the role of vowel inherent spectral change in vowel identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80: 1297–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oyama, S. 1976. A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 5: 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Patkowski, M. S. 1990. Age and accent in a second language: A reply to James Emil Flege. Applied Linguistics 11: 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peal, E. and W. E. Lambert. 1962. The relation of bilingualism to intelligence. Psychological Monographs 76: 1–23.Google Scholar
  47. Peschke, C., W. Ziegler, J. Kappes and A. Baumgaertner, A. 2009. Auditory-motor integration during fast repetition: The neoronal correlates of shadowing. Neuroimage 47: 392–402.Google Scholar
  48. Peterson, G. E. and H. L. Barney. 1952. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24: 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Piske, T., I. R. A MacKay and J. E. Flege. 2001. Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics 29: 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Purcell, E. T. and R. W. Suter. 1980. Predictors of pronunciation accuracy: A reexamination. Language Learning 30: 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rojczyk, A. 2010. Production and perception of vowel /æ/ by Polish learners of English. In: Proceedings from the Sixth International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, eds. K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, M. Wrembel M. Kul. (CD ROM version).Google Scholar
  52. Schockley, K., L. Sabadini and C. A. Fowler. 2004. Imitation in shadowing words. Perception and Psychophysics 66: 422–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Snow, C. E. and M. Hoefnagel-Höhle. 1977. Age differences in the pronunciation of foreign sounds. Language and Speech 20: 357–365.Google Scholar
  54. Syrdal, A. K. and H. S. Gopal. 1986. A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation in American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 79: 1086–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Szpyra-Kozłowska, J. 2009. On the irrelevance of sounds and prosody in foreign-accented English. Paper presented at Accents 2009, December 2009, Łódź.Google Scholar
  56. Thomson, R. I., T. M. Nearey and T. M. Derwing. 2009. A modified statistical pattern recognition approach to measuring the crosslinguistic similarity of Mandarin and English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126: 1448–1460.Google Scholar
  57. Thompson, I. 1991. Foreign accents revisited: The English pronunciation of Russian immigrants. Language Learning 41: 177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Trofimovich, P. and W. Baker. 2006. Learning second-language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Valdés, G. and R. A. Figueroa. 1994. Bilingualism and testing: A special case of bias. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  60. Weinreich, U. 1953. Languages in contact. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  61. White, L. and S. L. Mattys. 2007. Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies. Journal of Phonetics 35: 501–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Higher School of Occupational Safety ManagementUniversity of SilesiaKatowicePoland

Personalised recommendations