Advertisement

Intelligence in Gifted L2 Learners

  • Adriana BiedrońEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Second Language Learning and Teaching book series (SLLT)

Abstract

The role of intelligence in gifted L2 learners was investigated. The following instruments were used in the study: the Wechsler Intelligence Scale and the Modern Language Aptitude Test. Analysis revealed that intelligence in gifted L2 learners is higher than in the normal Polish population. The factor of memory has been found to provide a statistically significant contribution to foreign language aptitude. The conclusion is that intelligence and foreign language aptitude are moderately positively correlated and the correlation is primarily based on the shared feature representing the memory factor. Results might contribute to the understanding of the controversial role of the general cognitive factor (IQ) as well as other cognitive abilities in gifted L2 learners. A suggestion that memory, next to the reasoning ability, is a significant variable in determining the outcome of learning a foreign language is discussed.

Keywords

Intelligence Quotient General Cognitive Ability Memory Factor Intelligence Quotient Picture Completion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

Preparation of this research project was supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education in 2009–2011.

References

  1. Bachman, L. F. 1990. Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bachman, L. F. and A. S. Palmer. 1982. The construct validation of some components of communicative proficiency. TESOL Quarterly 16: 449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brzezinski, J., M. Gaul, E. Hornowska, A. Machowski and M. Zakrzewska. 1996. Skala Inteligencji D. Wechslera Dla Dorosłych. Wersja zrewidowana. WAIS-R (Pl). Podręcznik. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.Google Scholar
  4. Carroll, J. B. 1993. Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll, J. B. and S. Sapon. 2002. Modern Language Aptitude Test. MLAT. Manual 2002 Edition. N. Bethesda, Maryland: Second Language Testing, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Cattell, R. B. 1971. Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Hough ton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  7. Cronbach, L. J. 1990. Essentials in psychological testing. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  8. Gardner, R. C. 1985. Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  9. Gardner, R. C. and W. E. Lambert. 1972. Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  10. Grigorenko, E. L., R. J. Sternberg and M. E. Ehrman. 2000. A theory-based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: The CANAL-F theory and test. Modern Language Journal 84: 390–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hornowska, E. 2004. Skala Inteligencji dla Dorosłych Davida Wechslera WAIS-Roraz WAIS-III. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.Google Scholar
  12. Nęcka, E. 2003. Inteligencja. Geneza, struktura, funkcje. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.Google Scholar
  13. Oller, J. W. Jr. 1983. Evidence for a general language proficiency factor: An expectancy grammar. In Issues in language testing research, ed. J. W. Oller, Jr., 3–10. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  14. Sasaki, M. 1996. Second language proficiency, foreign language aptitude, and intelligence. Quantitative and qualitative analyses. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Skehan, P. 1982. Memory and motivation in language aptitude testing. PhD thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
  16. Skehan, P. 1998. A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sawyer, M. and L. Ranta. 2001. Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design. In Cognition and second language instruction, ed. P. Robinson, 319–354. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Spolsky, B. 1989. Conditions for second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Sternberg, R. J. 2002. The Theory of Successful Intelligence and its implications for language aptitude testing. In Individual differences and instructed language learning, ed. P. Robinson, 13–43. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  20. Sternberg, R. J. 2004. International handbook of intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wechsler, D. 1997. Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Third edition (WAIS III). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  22. Wesche, M. B., H. Edwards and W. Wells. 1982. Foreign language aptitude and intelligence. Applied Psycholinguistics 3: 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pomeranian AcademySłupskPoland

Personalised recommendations