Skin Imaging in Aesthetic Medicine

  • Peter M. Prendergast


Several procedures in aesthetic medical practice focus on improving the appearance and texture of the skin. Homogeneity of skin texture and color play an important role in facial attractiveness. Nonablative laser rejuvenation and tissue tightening using light and radiofrequency have emerged as useful treatment modalities that heat the dermis and improve skin texture by remodeling and increasing collagen. Images define the nature and extent of the problem being treated, document before-and-after comparisons, and facilitate the monitoring of skin changes over time. They also have a role as evidence in medical legal scenarios. Digital photography, skin imaging modalities, and optical imaging devices are discussed.


Digital Photography Facial Attractiveness Skin Texture Reflectance Confocal Microscopy Digital Micromirror Device 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Fink B, Grammer K, Thornhill R (2001) Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color. J Comp Psychol 115(1):92–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaplan H, Gat A (2009) Clinical and histopathological results following TriPollar radiofrequency skin treatments. J Cosmet Laser Ther 11(2):78–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dierickx CC (2006) The role of deep heating for noninvasive skin rejuvenation. Lasers Surg Med 38(9):799–807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stefanowska J, Zakowiecki D, Cal K (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the skin. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 24(8):875–880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bargo PR, Kollias N (2010) Measurement of skin texture through polarization imaging. Br J Dermatol 162(4):724–731PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jung B, Choi B, Durkin AJ, Kelly KM, Nelson JS (2004) Characterization of port wine stain skin erythema and melanin content using cross-polarized diffuse reflectance imaging. Lasers Surg Med 34(2):174–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bhatia AC, Molenda MA, Heffernan MP, Roach D (2009) Imaging. In: Kaminer MS, Arndt KA, Dover JS, Rohrer TE, Zachary CB (eds) Atlas of cosmetic surgery. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, p 46Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moncrieff M, Cotton S, Claridge E, Hall P (2002) Spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis: a new technique for imaging pigmented skin lesions. Br J Dermatol 146(3):448–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tehrani H, Walls J, Price G, Cotton S, Sassoon E, Hall P (2006) A novel imaging technique as an adjunct to the in vivo diagnosis of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Br J Dermatol 155(6):1177–1183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hatzis J (2004) The wrinkle and its measurement—a skin surface profilometric method. Micron 35(3):201–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ulrich M, Rüter C, Astner S, Sterry W, Lange-Asschenfeldt B, Stockfleth E, Röwert-Huber J (2009) Comparison of UV-induced skin changes in sun exposed vs. sun-protected skin—preliminary evaluation by reflectance confocal microscopy. Br J Dermatol 161(suppl 3):46–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saijo Y, Kobayashi K, Okada N, Hozumi N, Hagiwara Y, Tanaka A, Iwamoto T (2008) High frequency ultrasound imaging of surface and subsurface structures of fingerprints. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008:2173–2176PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lacarrubba F, Tedeschi A, Nardone B, Micali G (2008) Mesotherapy for skin rejuvenation: assessment of the subepidermal low-echogenic band by ultrasound evaluation with cross-sectional B-mode scanning. Dermatol Ther 21(suppl 3):S1–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Friedman PM, Skover GR, Payonk G, Geronemus RG (2002) Quantitative evaluation of nonablative laser technology. Semin Cutan Med Surg 21(4):266–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hsu J, Skover G, Goldman MP (2007) Evaluating the efficacy in improving facial photodamage with a mixture of topical antioxidants. J Drugs Dermatol 6(11):1141–1148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gold MH, Goldman MP, Biron J (2007) Human growth factor and cytokine skin cream for facial skin rejuvenation as assessed by 3D in vivo optical skin imaging. J Drugs Dermatol 6(10):1018–1023PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee MC, Hu S, Chen MC, Shih YC, Huang YL, Lee SH (2009) Skin rejuvenation with 1,064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in Asian patients. Dermatol Surg 35(6):929–932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kulick MI, Gajjar NA (2007) Analysis of histologic and clinical changes associated with Polaris WR treatment of facial wrinkles. Aesthet Surg J 27(1):32–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lin SJ, Jee SH, Dong CY (2007) Multiphoton microscopy: a new paradigm in dermatological imaging. Eur J Dermatol 17(5):361–366PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fisk NA, Jensen K, Knaggs H, Ferguson S (2010) The clinical utility of a hand-held computerized optical imaging system at assessing skin discoloration. J Cosmet Dermatol 9(2):103–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Venus Medical, Heritage HouseDublin 14Ireland

Personalised recommendations