Skip to main content

Centralized Super-Efficiency and Yardstick Competition – Incentives in Decentralized Organizations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Operations Research Proceedings 2010

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings ((ORP))

  • 1206 Accesses

Abstract

Due to deficient instruments of performance management, decentralized organizations often produce inefficiently. Promising approaches to dynamic incentives and performance management have recently been developed based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). These, however, are not yet able to account for the specific needs of central performance management. We develop two new intra-organizational performance measures for defining dynamic incentive schemes and increasing overall performance. For suggestive evidence we evaluate the performances of 11 bank branches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Andersen and N.C. Petersen. A procedure for ranking efficient units in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 39: 1261–1264, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Banker, A. Charnes, and W. Cooper. Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30: 1078–1092, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Bogetoft. DEA-Based Yardstick Competition: The Optimality of Best Practice Regulation. Annals of Operations Research, 73: 277–298, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Bogetoft. DEA and Activity Planning under Asymmetric Information. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13: 7–48, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Castelli, R. Pesenti, and W. Ukovich. A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the Decision Making Units is considered. Annals of Operations Research, 173(1): 207–235, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Lozano and G. Villa. Centralized resource allocation using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 22: 143–161, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Shleifer. A theory of Yardstick Competition. The RAND Journal of Economics, 16(3): 319–327, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Zhu. “Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking”. Springer, 2nd edition, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Varmaz, A., Varwig, A., Poddig, T. (2011). Centralized Super-Efficiency and Yardstick Competition – Incentives in Decentralized Organizations. In: Hu, B., Morasch, K., Pickl, S., Siegle, M. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2010. Operations Research Proceedings. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20009-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics