Skip to main content

Five Recommendations to Improve Tropical Silviculture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Silviculture in the Tropics

Part of the book series: Tropical Forestry ((TROPICAL,volume 8))

Abstract

Ecological, technological, and socioeconomic aspects are the main pillars for sustainable forest management (SFM). Based on the suggestions of the authors of this book, and in accordance with these pillars and the main thematic elements of SFM, we identified five fields of actions to improve silviculture in the tropics. There is an increasing demand on timber and other forest products. As forest expansion is in strong competition with other aims of land use, intensification (1) aiming at higher output per area is a promising approach for overcoming this major problem, for example, by short-term rotation forestry, domestication, site improvement, and other measures. Diversification (2) as complementary strategy aims at providing additional products and services, reducing risks and contributing to sustainable management at the landscape level. Therefore, temporal and spatial scales for management (3) have to be adapted to both, needs of individual land owner (usually timber) and to collective needs of societies (protection, water, biodiversity, etc.). Better matching of operational units and ecological spatial scales (e.g., plant–site matching) is an important prerequisite for improving efficiency of silvicultural measures. SFM depends strongly on acceptance of all stakeholders involved. It is a common agreement in science and practice that participatory approaches (4) can contribute significantly to sustainability in this context. However, on the global scale participatory approaches are still in the stage of development. Finally, we illustrate how integration of silviculture and forest management (5) including all mentioned aspects can overcome frequently applied timber mining methods, and leads to a modern approach of silviculture in terms of adaptive ecosystem management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Two prisoners are suspected to have committed a crime together. Each prisoner can reduce the individual punishment by confessing the crime: freedom instead of 5 years prison when the other prisoner refuses to give evidence, and 4 years each when the other prisoner confesses, too. The prisoner, who refuses to give evidence when the other prisoner confesses, will receive 5 years. Maximum reduction of collective punishment (2 years each) in turn can only be achieved when both of them refuse to give evidence. However, this decision includes the risk of being “betrayed” by the other prisoner.

References

  • Abdul Rahmam AR, Shashiah AK (2003) The role of enrichment planting programme of dipterocarp timber species in contributing to the sustainable forest management practice in Peninsular Malaysia: issues and challenges. Malays For 66:235–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Achard F, Eva HD, Stibig H-J, Mayaux P, Gallego J, Richards T, Malingreau J-P (2002) Determination of deforestation rates of the world’s humid tropical forests. Science 297:999–1002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Appanah S, Weinland G (1993) Planting quality timber trees in peninsular Malaysia. Malaysian Forest Record No. 38

    Google Scholar 

  • ATO/ITTO (2003). ATO/ITTO principles, criteria and indicators for the sustainable management of African natural tropical forests. ITTO Policy Development Series No 14. http://www.itto.int/direct/topics/topics_pdf_download/topics_id=1550000&no=1&disp=inline. Accessed 28 Oct 2010

  • Benskin H, Bedford L (1995) Multiple-purpose silviculture in British Columbia. Unasylva 46 (181):26–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruenig EF (1996) Conservation and management of tropical rainforests: an integrated approach to sustainability. CAB International, Wallingford, 339

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos JJ, Finegan B, Villalobos R (2001) Management of goods and services from neotropical forest biodiversity: diversified forest management in Mesoamerica. Assessment, Conservation and Sustainable Use of Forest Biodiversity. CBD Technical Series No. 3 (cbd-ts03), pp 5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins HC, Philips MS (1998) Tropical moist forest silviculture and management: a history of success and failure. CAB Internat, Wallingford, 359

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembner SA (1995) Editorial: silviculture: a key to sustainable forest management. Unasylva 181. http://www.fao.org/docrep/V5200E/v5200e00.htm#Contents

  • Finkeldey R, Hattemer HH (2007) Tropical forest genetics. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Günter S, Mosandl R, Cabrera O, Zimmermann M, Fiedler K, Knuth J, Boy J, Wilcke W, Meusel S, Makeschin M, Werner F, Gradstein R (2008) Natural forest management in neotropical mountain rain forests: an ecological experiment. In: Beck E, Bendix J, Kottke I, Makeschin F, Mosandl R (eds) Gradients in a tropical mountain ecosystem of Ecuador, vol 198, Ecological studies. Springer, Berlin, pp 363–376

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Günter S, Gonzalez P, Alvarez G, Aguirre N, Palomeque X, Haubrich F, Weber M (2009) Determinants for reforestation of abandoned pastures in the Andes: site factors, competing vegetation, and appropriate species selection. Forest Ecology and Management 258(2):81–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinimann HR (2010) A concept in adaptive ecosystem management: an engineering perspective. For Ecol Manage 259:848–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ITTO/IUCN (2009) ITTO/IUCN guidelines for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity in tropical timber production forests, ISBN 4-902045-41-9. ITTO/IUCN, Yokohama, p 120

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr A (1995) Ecosystem management must include the most human factors. Bioscience 45:378

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilroy HA, Gorchov DL (2010) Enrichment planting of an understory palm: effect of micro-environmental factors on seedling establishment, growth, and survival. Int J Biodivers Conserv 2(5):105–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke T (2010) A scientific perspective for silviculture. In: Spaethelf P (ed) Sustainable forest management in a changing world: a European perspective. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 141–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke T, Stimm B, Ammer Ch, Moog M (2005) Mixed forests reconsidered: a forest economics contribution on an ecological concept. For Ecol Manage 213:102–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoke T, Calvas B, Aguirre N, Román-Cuesta RM, Günter S, Stimm B, Weber M, Mosandl R (2009) Can tropical farmers reconcile subsistence needs with forest conservation? Front Ecol Environ 7(10):548–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuptz D, Grams T, Günter S (2010) Light acclimation of four native tree species employed in enrichment planting in a mountain rain forest in South-Ecuador. Trees Struct Funct 24:117–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamprecht H (1986) Waldbau in den Tropen. Die tropischen Waldökosysteme und ihre Baumarten – Möglichkeiten und Methoden zu ihrer nachhaltigen Nutzung. Parey, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorberbaum J (1994) No strategy is evolutionary stable in the repeated prisoner’s dilemma. J Theor Biol 168(2):117–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mosandl R, Felbermeier B (2001) From silviculture to forest ecosystem management Vom Waldbau zum Waldoekosystemmanagement. Forstarchiv 72(4):145–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyland RD (1996) Silviculture: concepts and applications. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Piotto D (2008) A meta-analysis comparing tree growth in monocultures and mixed plantations. For Ecol Manage 255(3–4):781–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puettmann KJ, Coates KD, Messier C (2009) A critique of silviculture: managing for complexity. Island, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards AE, Schmidt S (2010) Complementary resource use by tree species in a rain forest tree plantation. Ecol Appl 20(5):1237–1254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer J (1993) Plantations in the tropics: environmental concerns. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze M (2008) Technical and financial analysis of enrichment planting in logging gaps as a potential component of forest management in the eastern Amazon. For Ecol Manage 255:866–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzman S, Moreira A, Nepstad D (2000) Arguing tropical forest conservation: people versus parks. Conserv Biol 14:1370–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedjo RA (1999) Biotechnology and planted forests: assessment of potential and possibilities. Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 00–06

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd KR (1986) Plantation silviculture, vol 22, Forest sciences. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons AJ, Leakey RRB (2004) Tree domestication in tropical agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 61:167–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DM, Larsen BC, Kelty MJ, Ashton PMS (1996) The practice of silviculture: applied forest ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stimm B, Beck E, Guenter S, Aguirre N, Cueva E, Mosandl R, Weber M (2008) Reforestation of abandoned pastures: Seed ecology of native species and production of indigenous plant material. In: Beck E, Bendix J, Kottke I, Makeschin F, Mosandl R (eds) Gradients in a Tropical Mountain Ecosystem of Ecuador. Ecological Studies 198, Springer, Berlin, pp 433–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh J (2000) The fate of tropical forests: a matter of stewardship. Conserv Biol 14:1358–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomasius H, Schmidt PA (1996) Wald, Forstwirtschaft und Umwelt. Economica, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Toman MA, Ashton MS (1996) Sustainable forest ecosystems and management: a review article. For Sci 42(3):366–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl C, Barreto P, Verissimo A, Vidal E, Amaral P, Barros AC et al (1997) Natural resource management in the Brazilian Amazon: an integrated research approach. Bioscience 47:160–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villegas Z, Peña-Claros M, Mostacedo B, Alarcón A, Licona JC, Leaño C, Pariona W, Choque U (2009) Silvicultural treatments enhance growth rates of future crop trees in a tropical dry forest. For Ecol Manage 258(6):971–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber-Blaschke G, Mosandl R, Faulstich M (2005) History and mandate of sustainability: from local forestry to global policy. In: Wilderer PA, Schroeder ED, Kopp H (eds) Global sustainability. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoby J (1987) The purpose of forestry. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven Günter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Günter, S., Weber, M., Stimm, B., Mosandl, R. (2011). Five Recommendations to Improve Tropical Silviculture. In: Günter, S., Weber, M., Stimm, B., Mosandl, R. (eds) Silviculture in the Tropics. Tropical Forestry, vol 8. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19986-8_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics