Skip to main content

Biosurfactants for Soil Biology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bioaugmentation, Biostimulation and Biocontrol

Part of the book series: Soil Biology ((SOILBIOL,volume 108))

Abstract

Biosurfactants are microbially produced surface active agents with applications in soil bioremediation particularly in removing hydrocarbon and heavy metal contaminants from soil. Use of biosurfactants enhances the solubilisation, removal, bioavailability and biodegradation of hydrocarbons in soil. Biosurfactants solubilise hydrocarbons into the aqueous phase of soil where they can be either removed by soil washing or biodegraded by microbes. Various aliphatic, aromatic, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and petrochemical mixtures can be effectively removed by biosurfactants. Use of biosurfactants enhances the solubilisation and removal of heavy metals from soil. Anionic biosurfactants form ionic bonds with cationic heavy metals increasing their solubility into the aqueous phase of soil where they can be removed by soil washing. Cadmium, lead, arsenic, zinc, copper and nickel can be effectively removed by biosurfactants. Although rhamnolipids are the most common biosurfactants used for soil bioremediation, others such as surfactin, sophorolipids, and bioemulsans are also useful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abalos A, Vinas M, Sabate J, Manresa MA, Solanas AM (2004) Enhanced biodegradation of Casablanca crude oil by a microbial consortium in presence of a rhamnolipid produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa AT10. Biodegradation 15:249–260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arima K, Kahinuma A, Tamura G (1968) Surfactin, a crystalline peptide lipid surfactant produced by Bacillus subtilis: isolation, characterization and its inhibition of fibrin clot formation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 31:488–494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Asci Y, Nurbas M, Acikel YS (2007) Sorption of Cd(II) onto kaolin as a soil component and desorption of Cd(II) from kaolin using rhamnolipid biosurfactant. J Hazard Mat B 139:50–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asci Y, Nurbas M, Acikel YS (2008a) A comparative study for the sorption of Cd(II) by K-feldspar and sepiolite as soil components, and the recovery of Cd(II) using rhamnolipid biosurfactant. J Environ Manage 88:383–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Asci Y, Nurbas M, Acikel YS (2008b) Removal of zinc ions from a soil component Na-feldspar by a rhamnolipid biosurfactant. Desalination 223:361–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bai G, Brusseau ML, Miller RM (1997) Biosurfactant-enhanced removal of residual hydrocarbon from soil. J Contam Hydrol 25:157–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bai G, Brusseau ML, Miller RM (1998) Influence of cation type, ionic strength, and pH on solubilisation and mobilization of residual hydrocarbon by a biosurfactant. J Contam Hydrol 30:265–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banat IM, Makkar RS, Cameotra SS (2000) Potential commercial applications of microbial surfactants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 53:495–508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barathi S, Vasudevan N (2001) Utilization of petroleum hydrocarbons by Pseudomonas fluorescens isolated from a petroleum-contaminated soil. Environ Int 26:413–416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barkay T, Navon-Venezia S, Ron EZ, Rosenberg E (1999) Enhancement of solubilization and biodegradation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons by the bioemulsifier alasan. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:2697–2702

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cameotra SS, Singh P (2008) Bioremediation of oil sludge using crude biosurfactants. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 62:274–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Champion JT, Gilkey JC, Lamparski H, Retterer J, Miller RM (1995) Electron microscopy of rhamnolipid (biosurfactant) morphology: effects of pH, cadmium, and octadecane. J Colloid Interface Sci 170:569–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang J-H, Qiang Z, Huang C-P, Ellis AV (2009) Phenanthrene removal in unsaturated soils treated by electrokinetics with different surfactants–Triton X-100 and rhamnolipid. Colloids Surf A 348:157–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christofi N, Ivshina IB (2002) Microbial surfactants and their use in field studies of soil remediation. J Appl Microbiol 93:915–929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cubitto MA, Moran AC, Commendatore M, Chiarello MN, Baldini MD, Sineriz F (2004) Effects of Bacillus subtilis O9 biosurfactant on the bioremediation of crude oil-polluted soils. Biodegradation 15:281–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dahrazma B, Mulligan CN (2007) Investigation of the removal of heavy metals from sediments using rhamnolipid in a continuous flow configuration. Chemosphere 69:705–711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dahrazma B, Mulligan CN, Nieh M-P (2008) Effects of additives on the structure of rhamnolipid (biosurfactant): a small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) study. J Colloid Interface Sci 319:590–593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Das K, Mukherjee AK (2007) Crude petroleum-oil biodegradation efficiency of Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from a petroleum-oil contaminated soil from North-East India. Bioresour Technol 98:1339–1345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desai JD, Banat IM (1997) Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:47–64

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falatko DM, Novak JT (1992) Effects of biologically produced surfactants on the mobility and biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons. Water Environ Res 64:163–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franzetti A, Caredda P, Ruggeri C, La Colla P, Tamburini E, Papacchini M, Bestetti G (2009) Potential applications of surface active compounds by Gordonia sp. strain BS29 in soil remediation technologies. Chemoshpere 75:801–807

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gu MB, Chang ST (2001) Soil biosensor for the detection of PAH toxicity using an immobilized recombinant bacterium and a biosurfactant. Biosens Bioelectron 16:667–674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guerra-Santos L, Kappeli O, Fiechter A (1984) Pseudomonas aeruginosa biosurfactant production in continuous culture with glucose as carbon source. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:301–305

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herman DC, Artiola JF, Miller RM (1995) Removal of cadmium, lead, and zinc from soil by a rhamnolipid biosurfactant. Environ Sci Technol 29:2280–2285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ishigami Y, Gama H, Nagahora H (1987) The pH-sensitive conversion of molecular aggregated of rhamnolipid biosurfactant. Chem Lett 5:763–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito S, Inoue S (1982) Sophorolipids from Torulopsis bombicola: possible relation to alkane uptake. Appl Environ Microbiol 43:1278–1283

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ito S, Kinta M, Inoue S (1980) Growth of yeasts on n-alkanes: inhibition by a lactonic sophorolipid produced by Torulopsis bombicola. Agric Biol Chem 44:2221–2223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jain DK, Lee H, Trevors JT (1992) Effect of addition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa UG2 inocula or biosurfactants on biodegradation of selected hydrocarbons in soil. J Ind Microbiol 10:87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis FG, Johnson MJ (1949) A glyco-lipid produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Am Chem Soc 71:4124–4126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong SW, Corapcioglu MY, Roosevelt SE (2000) Micromodel study of surfactant foam remediation of residual trichloroethylene. Environ Sci Technol 34:3456–3461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juwarkar AA, Nair A, Dubey KV, Singh SK, Devotta S (2007) Biosurfactant technology for remediation of cadmium and lead contaminated soils. Chemosphere 68:1996–2002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Vipulanandan C (2006) Removal of lead from contaminated water and clay soil using a biosurfactant. J Environ Eng 132:777–786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuyukina MS, Ivshina IB, Makarov SO, Litvinenko LV, Cunningham CJ, Philp JC (2005) Effect of biosurfactants on crude oil desorption and mobilization in a soil system. Environ Int 31:155–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lai C-C, Huang Y-C, Wei Y-H, Chang J-S (2009) Biosurfactant-enhanced removal of total petroleum hydrocarbons from contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 167:609–614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lang S, Wagner F (1987) Structure and properties of biosurfactants. In: Kosaric N, Cairns WL, Gray NCC (eds) Biosurfactants and biotechnology. Dekker, NewYork, pp 21–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang S, Wullbrandt D (1999) Rhamnose lipids-biosynthesis, microbial production and application potential. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51:22–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lu S-J, Wang H-Q, Yao Z-H (2006) Isolation and characterization of gasoline-degrading bacteria from gas station leaking-contaminated soils. J Environ Sci 18:969–972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Massara H, Mulligan CN, Hadjinicolaou J (2007) Effect of rhamnolipids on chromium-contaminated kaolinite. Soil Sediment Contam 16:1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan CN (2005) Environmental applications for biosurfactants. Environ Pollut 133:183–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan CN (2009) Recent advances in the environmental applications of biosurfactants. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 14:372–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan CN, Wang S (2006) Remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soil by a rhamnolipid foam. Eng Geol 85:75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF (1999a) On the use of biosurfactants for the remocal of heavy metals from oil-contaminated soil. Environ Prog 18:50–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF, James S, Bennett HPJ (1999b) Metal removal from contaminated soil and sediments by the biosurfactant surfactin. Environ Sci Technol 33:3812–3820

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF (2001) Heavy metal removal from sediments by biosurfactants. J Hazard Mat 85:111–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan CN, Oghenekevwe C, Fukue M, Shimizu Y (2007) Biosurfactant enhanced remediation of a mixed contaminated soil and metal contaminated sediment. In: Seventh geoenvironmental engineering seminar, Grenoble, France, May 19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberbremer A, Muhller-Hurtig R, Wagner F (1990) Effect of addition of microbial surfactant on hydrocarbon degradation in soil population in a stirred reactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 32:485–489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa-Loza FJ, Noordman WH, Jannsen DB, Brusseau ML, Maier RM (2007) Effect of clays, metal oxides, and organic matter on rhamnolipid biosurfactant sorption by soil. Chemosphere 66:1634–1642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parra JL, Guinea J, Manresa MA, Robert M, Mercade ME, Comelles F, Bosch MP (1989) Chemical characterization and physicochemical behaviour of biosurfactants. J Am Oil Chem Soc 66:141–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pei X, Zhan X, Zhou L (2009) Effect of biosurfactant on the sorption of phenanthrene onto original and H2O2-treated soils. J Environ Sci 21:1378–1385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perfumo A, Banat IM, Marchant R, Vezzulli L (2007) Thermally enhanced approaches for bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils. Chemosphere 66:179–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman KSM, Banat IM, Thahira J, Thayumanavan T, Lakshmanaperumalsamy P (2002) Bioremediation of gasoline contaminated soil by a bacterial consortium amednded with poultry litter, coir pith and rhamnolipid biosurfactant. Bioresour Technol 81:25–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman KSM, Rahman TJ, Kourkoutas Y, Petsas I (2003) Enhanced bioremediation of n-alkane in petroleum sludge using bacterial consortium amended with rhamnolipid and micronutrients. Bioresour Technol 90:159–168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robert M, Mercade ME, Bosch MP, Parra JL, Espuny MJ, Manresa MA, Guinea J (1989) Effect of the carbon source on biosurfactant production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 44T1. Biotechnol Lett 11:871–874

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues L, Banat IM, Teixeira J, Oliveira R (2006) Biosurfactants: potential applications in medicine. J Antimicrob Chemother 57:609–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Said WA, Lewis DL (1991) Quantitative assessment of the effects of metals on microbial degradation of organic chemicals. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:1498–1503

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandrin TR, Chech AM, Maier RM (2000) A rhamnolipid biosurfactant reduces cadmium toxicity during naphthalene biodegradation. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4585–4588

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheibenbogen K, Zytner RG, Lee H, Trevors JT (1994) Enhanced removal of selected hydrocarbons from soil by Pseudomonas aeruginosa UG2 biosurfactants and some chemical surfactants. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 59:53–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schippers C, Gessner K, Muller T, Scheper T (2000) Microbial degradation of phenanthrene by addition of a sophorolipid mixture. J Biotechnol 83:189–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shin K-H, Kim K-W, Ahn Y (2006) Use of biosurfactant to remediate phenanthrene-contaminated soil by the combined solubilisation-biodegradation process. J Hazard Mater 137:1831–1837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Van Hamme JD, Ward OP (2007) Surfactants in microbiology and biotechnology: Part 2. Application aspects. Biotechnol Adv 25:99–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tan H, Champion JT, Artiola JF, Brusseau ML, Miller RM (1994) Complexation of cadmium by a rhamnolipid biosurfactant. Environ Sci Technol 28:2402–2406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torrens JL, Herman DC, Miller-Maier RM (1998) Biosurfactant (rhamnolipid) sorption and the impact on rhamnolipid-facilitated removal of cadmium from various soils under saturated flow conditions. Environ Sci Technol 32:776–781

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Urum K, Pekdemir T (2004) Evaluation of biosurfactants for crude oil contaminated soil washing. Chemosphere 57:1139–1150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Urum K, Pekdemir T, Gopur M (2003) Optimum conditions for washing of crude oil-contaminated soil with biosurfactant solutions. Process Saf Environ Prot 81:203–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vipulanandan C, Ren X (2000) Enhanced solubility and biodegradation of naphthalene with biosurfactant. J Environ Eng 126:629–634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Mulligan CN (2004a) Rhamnolipid foam enhanced remediation of cadmium and nickel contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 157:315–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Mulligan CN (2004b) An evaluation of surfactant foam technology in remediation of contaminated soil. Chemosphere 57:1079–1089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Mulligan CN (2006) Occurrence of arsenic contamination in Canada: sources, behavior, and distribution. Sci Total Environ 366:701–721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Mulligan CN (2009a) Rhamnolipid biosurfactant-enhanced soil flushing for the removal of arsenic and heavy metals from mine tailings. Process Biochem 44:296–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Mulligan CN (2009b) Arsenic mobilization from mine tailings in the presence of a biosurfactant. Appl Geochem 24:928–935

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whang L-M, Liu P-W, Ma C-C, Cheng S-S (2008) Application of biosurfactants, rhamnolipid, and surfactin, for enhanced biodegradation of diesel-contaminated water and soil. J Hazard Mat 151:155–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YM, Miller RM (1992) Enhanced octadecane dispersion and biodegradation by a Pseudomonas rhamnolipid surfactant (biosurfactant). Appl Environ Microbiol 58:3276–3282

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YM, Miller RM (1995) Effect of rhamnolipid (biosurfactant) structure on solubilisation and biodegradation of n-alkanes. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:2247–2251

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YM, Maier WJ, Miller RM (1997) Effect of rhamnolipids on the dissolution, bioavailability and biodegradation of phenanthrene. Environ Sci Technol 31:2211–2217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Poonam Mudgil .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mudgil, P. (2011). Biosurfactants for Soil Biology. In: Singh, A., Parmar, N., Kuhad, R. (eds) Bioaugmentation, Biostimulation and Biocontrol. Soil Biology, vol 108. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19769-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics