Value Chain of Technology in Higher Education Institutions: From IT Resources to Technological Performance

  • Jacques Bulchand-Gidumal
  • Santiago Melián-González
  • Javier Osorio-Acosta
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 348)

Abstract

Different studies confirm that the presence of IT in firms, together with human and other organizational resources, has a positive influence on the performance of organizations. However, the details of the process through which that influence is produced have not been clarified. This study is based on an extensive IT data base corresponding to a sample of universities and presents an IT-technological performance value chain and confirms the hypotheses about its functioning. The result is a value chain that begins with the IT planning, passes through different components related to technology in organizations and ends with the performance of the technology. We believe that this research is useful to higher education institutions managers by allowing them to have a clear path on how to improve the return of IT investments.

Keywords

IT performance firm performance IT resources IT strategic planning Value chain resource-based view of the firm universities Spain 

References

  1. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., Thompson, R.: The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technological Studies 2(2), 285–309 (1995)Google Scholar
  2. Barney, J.B.: Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management 17(1), 99–120 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bharadwaj, A.S.: A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly 24(1), 169–196 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhatt, G.D., Grover, V.: Types of Information Technology Capabilities and Their Role in Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study. Journal of Management Information Systems 22(2), 253–277 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. Boar, B.: The Art of Strategic Planning for Information Technology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Nueva York (NY) (2001)Google Scholar
  6. Broadbent, M., Weill, P.: Management by Maxim: How Business and IT Managers can Create IT Infrastructures. Sloan Management Review 38(3), 77–92 (1992)Google Scholar
  7. Broadbent, M., Weill, P., St Clair, D.: The implications of information technology infrastructure for business process redesign. Management Information Systems Quarterly 23, 159–182 (1999)Google Scholar
  8. Brynjolfsson, E.: Beyond the productivity paradox. Communications of the ACM 41(8), 49–55 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brynjolfsson, E.: The IT productivity gap. Optimize Magazine 21 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. Chin, W.W.: Issues and opinion on structure equation modeling. MIS Quarterly 22(1), 7–16i (1998)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, B.L., Watson, H.J., Wixom, B.H., Goodhue, D.L.: Data warehousing supports corporate strategy at first American corporation. MIS Quarterly 24(4), 547–567 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Francalanci, C., Galal, H.: Information Technology and worker composition: determinants of productivity in the Life Insurance Industry. MIS Quarterly 22(2), 227–241 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geisser, S.: A predictive approach to the random effects model. Biometrica 61, 101–107 (1974)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hitt, L., Brynjolfsson, E.: Productivity, Profit and Consumer Welfare: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value. MIS Quarterly 20(2), 121–142 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kholi, R., Devaraj, S.: Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta-Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm-Level Empricial Resarch. Information System Research 14(2), 127–145 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marchand, D.A., Kettinger, W.J., Rollins, J.D.: Information orientation: people, technology and the bottom line. MIT Sloan Management review 4(41), 69–80 (2000)Google Scholar
  17. Melville, N., Kraemer, K., Gurbaxani, V.: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly 28(2), 283–322 (2004)Google Scholar
  18. Newbert, S.L.: Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal 28, 121–146 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Powell, C.T., Dent-Micallef, A.: Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal 18(5), 375–405 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ringle, C., Wende, S., Will, A.: Smart-PLS Version 2.0 M3 (2005), http://www.smartpls.de
  21. Ross, J.W., Beath, C.M., Goodhue, D.L.: Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Review 38(1), 31–45 (1996)Google Scholar
  22. Sambamurthy, V., Zmud, R.: IT Management Competency Assessment: A Tool for Creating Business Value through IT. Financial Executives Research Foundation, Morristown (1994)Google Scholar
  23. Schreyer, P.: Information and communication technology and measurement of real output, final demand and productivity. STI Working Paper 1998/2, OCDE (1998)Google Scholar
  24. Soh, C., Markus, M.L.: How IT Creates Business Value: A Process Theory Synthesis. In: ICIS, pp. 29–41 (1995)Google Scholar
  25. Stone, M.: Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 36, 111–147 (1974)MATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Teo, T.S.H., Ang, J.S.K.: Critical success factors in the alignment of IS plans with business plans. International Journal of Information Management 19, 173–185 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacques Bulchand-Gidumal
    • 1
  • Santiago Melián-González
    • 1
  • Javier Osorio-Acosta
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Economía y Dirección de EmpresasUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran CanariaLas PalmasSpain

Personalised recommendations