Advertisement

Examination of Decision Support Systems for Composite CBA and MCDA Assessments of Transport Infrastructure Projects

  • Michael Bruhn Barfod
  • Anders Vestergaard Jensen
  • Steen Leleur
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems book series (LNE, volume 648)

Abstract

This paper examines decision support systems (DSS) for composite appraisals of transport infrastructure projects comprising both cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). Two DSS, REMBRANDT and COSIMA, are in this context examined and compared using a case study dealing with alternatives for a new high-speed railway line in Sweden. The REMBRANDT system is based on multiplicative value functions and makes use of pair wise comparisons on both attribute and criteria level. The COSIMA system is based on additive value functions and makes use of the REMBRANDT technique using pair wise comparisons on attribute level and swing weights on criteria level. One difference between the two approaches is the focus the COSIMA system puts on combining the CBA and MCDA results influencing, among other things, the way that the final results are expressed. Finally, a recommendation for the use of DSS within transport infrastructure appraisals is set out.

Keywords

COSIMA Decision support systems Multi-criteria decision analysis REMBRANDT 

References

  1. Barzilai, J., Cook, W., Golany, B.: Consistent weights for judgement matrices of the relative importance for alternatives. Operations Research Letters 6: 3, 131–134 (1987)Google Scholar
  2. Belton, V., Stewart, T.J.: Multi Criteria Decision Analysis – An Integrated Approach. Kluwer (2002)Google Scholar
  3. Goodwin, P., Wright, G.: Decision Analysis for Management Judgment. Wiley (2004)Google Scholar
  4. Hiselius, L., Barfod, M.B., Leleur, S., Jeppesen, S.L., Jensen, A.V., Hjalte, K.: Helhetsorienterad Utvärdering av Kollektivtrafikåtgärder. University of Lund (2009)Google Scholar
  5. Leleur, S.: Road Infrastructure Planning – A Decision Oriented Approach. Polyteknisk Press (2000)Google Scholar
  6. Leleur, S.: Systemic Planning. Polyteknisk Press, pp. 169–197 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. Lootsma, F.A.: Numerical scaling of human judgement in pairwise-comparison methods for fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis. In: Mitra, G. (ed.), Mathematical Models for Decision Support, Springer-Verlag, pp. 57–88 (1988)Google Scholar
  8. Lootsma, F.A.: The REMBRANDT system for multi-criteria decision analysis via pair wise comparisons or direct rating. Report 92–05, Faculteit der Technische Wiskunde en Informatica, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands (1992)Google Scholar
  9. Olson, D.L.: Decision Aids for Selection Problems. Springer-Verlag (1996)Google Scholar
  10. Olson, D.L., Fliedner, G., Currie, K.: Comparison of the REMBRANDT system with analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 82, 522–539 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Phillips, L.D.: Decision Conferencing. A working paper LSEOR 06.85 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. Saaty, T.L.: Scenarios and priorities in transport planning: Application to the Sudan. Transport Research 11, 343–350 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Salling, K.B., Leleur, S., Jensen, A.V.: Modelling decision support and uncertainty for large infrastructure projects: The CLG-DSS Model of the Øresund fixed link. Decision Support Systems 43, 1539–1547 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Salling, K.B., Landex, A., Barfod, M.B.: Appraisal of the railway line between Copenhagen and Ringsted by the use of a decision support model named COSIMA-DSS. Accepted for Journal of Advanced Transportation (2008)Google Scholar
  15. Van den Honert, R.C., Lootsma, F.A.: Assessing the quality of negotiated proposals using the REMBRANDT system. European Journal of Operations Research 120, 162–173 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Von Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W.: Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge University Press (1986)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Bruhn Barfod
    • 1
  • Anders Vestergaard Jensen
    • 1
  • Steen Leleur
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of TransportTechnical University of DenmarkLyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations