Evaluating Trade-Offs Between Sustainability, Performance, and Cost of Green Machining Technologies

  • Moneer Helu
  • Jan Rühl
  • David Dornfeld
  • Patrick Werner
  • Gisela Lanza
Conference paper


The growing demand to reduce environmental impacts has encouraged manufacturers to pursue various green manufacturing technologies and strategies. These solutions, though, may have a direct impact on several productivity metrics including availability, quality, service life, and cost. This study presents an approach to evaluate the trade-offs between the environmental, performance, and financial impacts of green machining technologies by combining green manufacturing principles into life cycle performance evaluation. The approach is validated by investigating the implications of reducing the processing time by increasing the cutting speed and chip load to green a horizontal milling process.


Life Cycle Cost Green Machining Data Acquisition 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hendrickson, C. T.; Horvath, A.; Joshi, S.; Lave, L. B. (1998):Economic Input-Output Models for Environmental Life-CycleAssessment, in: Environmental Science and Technology, Vol.32, No. 4, pp. 184A-191A.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Munoz, A. A.; Sheng, P. (1995): An Analytical Approach forDetermining the Environmental Impact of MachiningProcesses, in: Journal of Materials Processing Technology,Vol. 53, pp. 736-758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Diaz, N.; Choi, S.; Helu, M.; Chen, Y.; Jayanathan, S.; YasuiY.; Kong, D.; Pavanaskar, S.; Dornfeld, D. (2010): MachineTool Design and Operation Strategies for Green Manufacturing,in: Proceedings of the 4th CIRP International Conferenceon High Performance Cutting, pp. 271-276, Gifu, Japan.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Narita, H., Desmira, N., Fujimoto, H. (2008): EnvironmentalBurden Analysis for Machining Operation Using LCA Method,in: Proceedings of the 41st CIRP Conference on ManufacturingSystems, pp. 65-68, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fleischer, J.; Schopp, M.; Broos, A.; Wieser, J. (2008): SustainableDesign of Machine Tools through Load-DependentInterventions and Adapted Services, in: Proceedings of the41st CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, pp. 173-176, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vijayaraghavan, A.; Dornfeld, D. (2010): Automated energymonitoring of machine tools, in: Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 59,No. 1, pp. 21-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuhrke, B.; Schrems, S.; Eisele, C.; Abele, E. (2010): Methodologyto Assess the Energy Consumption of Cutting MachineTools, in: Proceedings of the 17th CIRP InternationalConference on Life Cycle Engineering, pp. 76-82, Hefei, China.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dietmair, A.; Verl, A. (2010): Energy Consumption Assessmentand Optimisation in the Design and Use Phase of MachineTools, in: Proceedings of the 17th CIRP InternationalConference on Life Cycle Engineering, pp. 116-121, Hefei,China.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Draganescu, F.; Gheorghe, M.; Doicin, C. V. (2003): Modelsof Machine Tool Efficiency and Specific Consumed Energy,in: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 141, pp.9-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klocke, F.; Schlosser, R.; Lung, D. (2010): Energy and ResourceConsumption of Cutting Processes – How ProcessParameter Variations can Optimise the Total Process Efficiency,in: Proceedings of the 17th CIRP International Conferenceon Life Cycle Engineering, pp. 111-115, Hefei, China.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Norris, G. A. (2001): Integrating Life Cycle Cost Analysis andLCA, in: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol.6, No. 2, pp. 118-120.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fleischer, J.; Wawerla, M. (2007): Risk Management of WarrantyContracts in Machine Building Industry, in: InternationalApplied Reliability Symposium, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Niggeschmidt, S.; Helu, M.; Diaz, N.; Behmann, B.; Lanza, G.;Dornfeld, D. A. (2010): Integrating Green and SustainabilityAspects into Life Cycle Performance Evaluation, in: Proceedingsof the 17th CIRP International Conference on Life CycleEngineering, pp. 366-371, Heifei, China.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lanza, G.; Niggeschmidt, S.; Werner, P. (2009): Optimizationof Preventative Maintenance and Spare Part Provision forMachine Tools Based on Variable Operational Conditions, in:Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 429-432.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kicherer, A.; Schaltegger, S.; Tschochohei, H.; Pozo, B. F.(2007): Eco-Efficiency: Combining Life Cycle Assessmentand Life Cycle Costs via Normalization, in: International Journalof Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 537-543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thiede, S.; Herrmann, C. (2010): Simulation-based EnergyFlow Evaluation for Sustainable Manufacturing Systems, in:Proceedings of the 17th CIRP International Conference onLife Cycle Engineering, pp. 99-104, Hefei, China.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Inamasu, Y.; Fujishima, M.; Hideta, H.; Noguchi, K. (2010):The Effects of Cutting Condition on Power Consumption ofMachine Tools, in: Proceedings of the 4th CIRP InternationalConference on High Performance Cutting, Vol. 1, pp. 267-270, Gifu, Japan.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dahmus, J. B.; Gutowski, T. G. (2004): An EnvironmentalAnalysis of Machining, in: Proceedings of the 2004 ASME InternationalMechanical Engineering Congress and RD&D Expo,IMECE2004-62600, Anaheim, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Behrendt, T. (2010): Development of a Simulation-BasedApplication to Derive and Estimate Potentials of EfficiencyMeasures for Diverse Machine Tool Processes, Diploma Thesis,Braunschweig University of Technology.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pacific Gas and Electric Company (2007): Economics ofPower Factor Correction in Large Facilites >400kW, accessed11/10/10, from:
  21. 21.
    Pacific Gas and Electric Company (2010): Industrial (JUNE 1,2010 – Present), in: Pacific Gas and Electric – Tariff Book,accessed 11/17/10, from: IndustrialCurrent.xls

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moneer Helu
    • 1
  • Jan Rühl
    • 2
  • David Dornfeld
    • 1
  • Patrick Werner
    • 2
  • Gisela Lanza
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory for Manufacturing and SustainabilityUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Production Science, Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations