Advertisement

Strategic Evaluation of Manufacturing Technologies

  • Gunther Reinhart
  • Sebastian Schindler
  • Pascal Krebs
Conference paper

Abstract

Strategic technology planning sets the course for the future production of a manufacturer. Therefore, paying attention to market trends and new emerging technologies is indispensable. In order to compare different technologies from a longterm perspective, this paper presents an approach for the strategic selection of manufacturing technologies. Thereby, a multi-criteria evaluation is employed to incorporate the strategy of a producing company and consider quantitative and qualitative influencing factors. Because most factors are uncertain and the result of expert estimations, the approach includes the consideration of intrinsic uncertainties.

Keywords

Manufacturing Technology Life Cycle Maturity Assessment Strategic Technology Planning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Tolio, T.; Ceglarek, D.; ElMaraghy, H. A.; Fischer, A.; Hu, S.J.; Laperrière, L.; Newman, S. T.; Váncza, J. (2010):SPECIES – Co-evolution of products, processes andproduction systems. Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp.672-693.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Klocke, F. (2009): Production Technology in High-WageCountries – From Ideas of Today to Products of Tomorrow. in:Schlick, C. M. (Ed.): Industrial Engineering and Ergonomics –Visions, Concepts, Methods and Tools Festschrift in Honor ofProfessor Holger Luczak. Springer, Berlin, New York, pp. 13-30.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    DIN 8580 (2002) Manufacturing processes – terms anddefinitions, division. Beuth, Berlin.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zaeh, M. F.; Reinhart, G.; Pohl, J.; Schindler, S.; Karl, F.;Rimpau, C. (2009): Modelling, Anticipating and ManagingCyclic Behaviour in Industry. in: Proceedings of the 3rdInternational Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurableand Virtual Production (CARV2009), pp. 16-43, Munich,Germany.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wiendahl, H. P.; ElMaraghy, H. A.; Nyhuis P.; Zaeh, M. F.;Wiendahl, H. H.; Duffie, N.; Kolakowski M. (2007): ChangeableManufacturing – Classification, Design and Operation.Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 1-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reinhart, G.; Schindler, S.; Pohl, J.; Rimpau, C. (2009):Cycle-Oriented Manufacturing Technology Chain Planning. in:Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Changeable,Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production (CARV2009), pp. 702-711, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sommerlatte, T.; Deschamps, J. P. (1985): Der strategischeEinsatz von Technologien. in: Little, A. D. (Ed.): Managementim Zeitalter der strategischen Führung. Gabler, Wiesbaden,pp. 39-76.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eversheim, W.; Schuh, G. (1996): Betriebshütte – Produktionund Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York,1996, pp. 10.36-10.72.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brousseau, E.; Barton, R.; Dimov, S.; Bigot, S. (2010): AMethodology for Evaluating the Technological Maturity ofMicro and Nano Fabrication Processes. IFIP, Advances inInformation and Communication Technology, Vol. 315, No. 1,Springer, Boston, pp. 329-336.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gouvea Da Costa, S. E.; Platts, K. W.; Fleury, A. (2006):Strategic selection of advanced manufacturing technologies(AMT), based on the manufacturing vision. InternationalJournal of Computer Applications in Technology, Vol. 27, No.1, pp. 12-23.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bullinger, H. J. (2008): Fokus Technologie – Chancenerkennen – Leistungen entwickeln. Carl Hanser Verlag,Munich, Vienna.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mankins, J. C. (1995): Technology Readiness Level – AWhite Paper, Advanced Concepts Office, Office of SpaceAccess and Technology.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Herrmann, C.; Thiede, S. (2009): Process chain simulation tofoster energy efficiency in manufacturing. CIRP Journal ofManufacturing Science and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp.221-229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reinhardt, S.; Reinhart, G. (2009): Resource EfficiencyValuation of Manufacturing Processes. in: Digiesi, S.; Mossa,G.; Mummolo, G.; Ranieri, L. (Ed.): Quaderni della XIVSummer School 'Fancesco Turco'. pp. IV.84-IV.91, Monopoli,Italy.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krebs, P.; Müller, N.; Schellmann, H.; Reinhardt, S.; Bredowvon, M.; Reinhart, G. (2009): Risikobewertung produzierenderUnternehmen. ZWF – Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichenFabrikbetrieb, Vol. 104, No. 3, pp. 174-180.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosenkranz, F.; Missler-Behr, M. (2005): Unternehmensrisikenerkennen und managen – Einführung in diequantitative Planung. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brieke, M. (2009): Erweiterte Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung inder Fabrikplanung (EWR). Diss. Hannover. LeibnizUniversitaet Hannover.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Korves, B.; Krebs, P. (2008): Planung und Bewertung vonFlexibilität in Fabrikplanungsprojekten bei der Siemens AG.in: Tagungsband Muenchener Kolloquium – Innovationen fürdie Produktion, pp. 57-67.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zimmermann, H. J. (1991): Fuzzy set theory - and itsapplications, Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang, L. X. (1997): A course in fuzzy systems and control,Upper Saddle River N. J.: Prentice Hall.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yen, J.; Langari, R. (1999): Fuzzy logic: Intelligence, control,and information, Upper Saddle River N. J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reinhart, G; Schindler; S. (2010): A Strategic EvaluationApproach for Defining the Maturity of ManufacturingTechnologies. in: Proceedings of the International Conferenceon Engineering and Technology Management (ICETM2010),Venice, Italy, Vol. 6, No. 71, pp. 920-925.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reinhart, G.; Krebs, P.; Zaeh, M. F. (2009): Fuzzy LogicbasedIntegration of Qualitative Uncertainties into MonetaryFactory Evaluations. in: Proceedings of the IEEE InternationalConference on Control and Automation (ICCA2009), pp. 385-391, Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dieplold, K., J.; Lohmann, B. (2010): Transient ProbabilisticRecurrent Fuzzy Systems. IEEE International Conference onSystems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC2010), pp. 3529-3536,Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gunther Reinhart
    • 1
  • Sebastian Schindler
    • 1
  • Pascal Krebs
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Machine Tools and Industrial ManagementTechnische Universitaet MuenchenMuenchenGermany

Personalised recommendations