Advertisement

Simultaneous Application of Design for Sustainable Behavior and Linked Benefit Strategies in Practice

  • Johannes Schmalz
  • Casper Boks
Conference paper

Abstract

Design for sustainable behavior implies applying design strategies that explicitly take into account human behavior, thereby minimizing user-related environmental losses. In addition, the application of linked-benefit strategies has been suggested to ensure the design of commercially interesting products, linking sustainability benefits to financial, functionality, aesthetical or convenience benefits. However, no case studies have been identified that apply both design strategies in one particular product design. Since a methodology for doing so is lacking, this paper, based on the development of a desk lamp, suggests, discusses, and evaluates possible directions for such an approach.

Keywords

Design for Sustainable Behavior Ecodesign User-centered Design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Wood, G., Newborough (2003). Dynamic energy-consumptionindicators for domestic appliances: environment, behaviourand design, School of Engineering and Physical Sciences,Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pettersen, I.N., Boks, C. (2009). The future of design forsustainable behaviour. Ecodesign 2009: Sixth InternationalSymposium on Environmentally Conscious Design andInverse Manufacturing, December 7-9. 2009, Sapporo,Japan.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jelsma, J. (2006). “Designing ‘Moralized’ products: theoryand practice”. In: Verbeek, P.-P., and A. Slob, eds., Userbehavior and technology development, Springer, Berlin, 2006,221–231.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fogg, B.J., (2004). Persuasive technology: using computersto change what we think and do, Morgan KaufmannPublishers, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lockton, D., D. Harrison, and N. Stanton (2008). “Making theuser more efficient: design for sustainable behaviour”,International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 2008, 1(1),3–8.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wever, R., J. van Kuijk, and C. Boks (2008). ”User-centreddesign for sustainable behaviour”, International Journal ofSustainable Engineering, 2008, 1(1), 9–20.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mazé, R., and J. Redström (2008). ”Switch! Energy Ecologiesin Everyday Life”, Int. Journal of Design, 2008, 2(3), 55-70.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lilley, D. (2009). “Design for sustainable behaviour: strategiesand perceptions”, Design Studies, 2009.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scott, K., J. Quist, and C. Bakker (2009). “Co-design, socialpractices and sustainable innovation: involving users in aliving lab exploratory study on bathing”, Joint Actions onClimate Change, Aalborg, Denmark, 8-10 June 2009.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stevels, A. (2000). ‘Green marketing of consumerelectronics’, Proceedings of the ‘Electronics Goes Green’Conference, Berlin, Germany, September, pp.539–544.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mansouri-Azar I., Newborough M., Probert D. (1996). Energyconsumptionin UK domestic households: impact of domesticelectrical appliances. In: Applied Energy 54/3, pp. 211–285.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blythe, M. and Dearden, A. (2008). Representing olderpeople: Towards meaningful images of the user in designscenarios, Universal Access in the Information Society,Volume 8, number 1, pp. 21-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lilley, D., Lofthouse, V. and Bhamra, T. (2005). Towardsinstinctive sustainable product use. Presented at the 2ndInternational Conference: Sustainability Creating the Culture,2-4th November 2005, Aberdeen Exhibition & ConferenceCentre, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lockton, D., Harrison, D.J., Stanton, N.A. (2010). Design withIntent: 101 patterns for influencing behaviour through design(v.1.0), Windsor: Equifine 2010 (ISBN 978-0-9565421-0-6print; 978-0-9565421-1-3 eBook).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elias, E., DeKoninck, E. and Culley, S. (2007). The potentialfor domestic energy savings through assessing userbehaviour and changes in design In: EcoDesign 2007: 5thInternational Symposium on Environmentally ConsciousDesign and Inverse Manufacturing, 10-13 December 2007,Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dyble M., Narendran N., Bierman A., Klein T. (2005). Impactsof Dimming White LEDs: Chromaticity Shifts Due to DifferentDimming Methods. In: Proceedings SPIE 5941, pp.291-299.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wallentowitz H., Reif K. (2006). Handbuch Kraftfahrzeugelektronik:Grundlagen, Komponenten, Systeme,Anwendungen. Vieweg Verlag, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Palmborg, C. (1986). Social habits and energy consumingbehaviour in single-family houses. Stockholm: SwedishCouncil for Building Research.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gram-Hansen, K. (2003). Domestic electricity consumption—consumers and appliances. Paper, Nordic Conference onEnvironmental Social Sciences (NESS), June, Turku/Åbo.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Schmalz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Casper Boks
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Engineering Design and Industrial Design (IKTD)University of StuttgartStuttgartGermany
  2. 2.Department of Product DesignNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations