Skip to main content

Toward Establishing Design Methods for Cloud-Based Business Platforms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Functional Thinking for Value Creation

Abstract

‘Cloud computing’ enables system integrators to develop business platforms from existing system by combining software and hardware functions provided by virtualized servers and resources. This functional substitution is the essence of cloud computing and it is the embodiment of the concept of Product-Service Systems in the IT industry. Bearing this in mind, this paper proposes design methods for cloud-based business platforms. By applying Axiomatic Design, Design Structure Matrix and Design-for-X, these design methods can be streamlined, thereby identifying better alignment/separation of functionalities and allocating them to physical servers and resources. Accordingly, the methods will facilitate the shift to service-based business in the IT industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

9 REFERENCES

  1. Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A., Katz, R.,Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D., Rabkin, A., Stoica, I.,Zaharia, M. (2009): Above the Cloud: A Berkeley View ofCloud Computing, Available at: http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2009/EECS-2009-28.pdf (accessed 10th Nov. 2010).

  2. Suh, N.P. (2001): Axiomatic Design, Oxford University Press,2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Steward, D.V. (1981): The design structure system: a methodfor managing the design of complex systems, IEEETransactions in Engineering Management, vol.28, no.3,pp.71-84.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eppinger, S.D. (1997): A planning method for integration oflarge-scale engineering systems, In Proceedings of the 11thInt'l Conf. on Engineering Design (ICED1997), pp.199-204.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Browning, T.R. (2001): Applying the Design Structure Matrixto System Decomposition and Integration Problems: AReview and New Directions, IEEE Transactions onEngineering Management, Vol. 48, No. 3, 2001, pp.292-306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller, G.A. (1956): The Magical Number Seven, Plus orMinus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for ProcessingInformation, Psychological Review, 63, pp.81-97.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paul, G., Beitz, W. (1996): Engineering Design – A systematicApproach, 2nd Edition, London: Springer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kimita, K., Akasaka, F., Hosono, S., Shimomura, Y. (2010):Design Method for Concurrent PSS Development, InProceedings of CIRP, IPS2 Conf. 2010, pp.283-290.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kimita, K., Akasaka, F., Hosono, S., Shimomura, Y. (2010):Design Method for Life Cycle Oriented Product-ServiceSystems Development Design, In Proceedings of the 43rdCIRP Conf. on Manufacturing Systems, pp.281-288.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Albers, A., Sedchaicharn, K., Sauter, C., Burger, W. (2009): AMethod to Define a Product Architecture Early in ProductDevelopment Using Contact and Channel Model, InProceedings of the Int'l Conf. on Engineering Design 2009,pp.241-252.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lim, Ys. (2007): Differing Roles of Axiomatic Design andDesign Structure Matrix in Reducing System Complexity, InProceedings of the IEEE Industrial Engineering andEngineering Management (IEEM 2007), pp.994-998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Information-Technology Promotion Agency (2010):Standardizing Grades of Non-Functional Requirements,Available at http://sec.ipa.go.jp/reports/20100416.html(accessed 10th Nov. 2010, In Japanese).

  13. Whitfield, R.I, Smith, J.S, Duffy, A.H.B (2002): Identifyingcomponent modules, In Proceedings of the 7th Int'l Conf. onArtificial Intelligence in Design (AID'02), pp.15-17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hosono, S., Kimita, K., Akasaka, F., Hara, T., Shimomura, Y., Arai, T. (2011). Toward Establishing Design Methods for Cloud-Based Business Platforms. In: Hesselbach, J., Herrmann, C. (eds) Functional Thinking for Value Creation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19689-8_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19689-8_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19688-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19689-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics