A Manufacturing Core Concepts Ontology for Product Lifecycle Interoperability

  • Zahid Usman
  • Robert Ian Marr Young
  • Nitishal Chungoora
  • Claire Palmer
  • Keith Case
  • Jenny Harding
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 76)


This paper proposes a manufacturing core concepts ontology (MCCO) aimed at providing support for product life cycle interoperability. The potential focus of the work is interoperability across the production and design domains of product lifecycle. A core set of manufacturing concepts and their key relationships are identified in MCCO. Semantics are captured formally through heavyweight logic using rigorous rules and axioms. Three different levels of specialization have been identified according to the degree of specialization required. Each level provides an immediate route to interoperability for the concepts specialized from that level. MCCO enable knowledge sharing across design and production domains through core concepts. A successful initial experimental implementation has been done to demonstrate the working of MCCO.


semantics core concepts interoperability manufacturing ontology knowledge sharing product lifecycle design and production 


  1. 1.
    Frankovič, B., Budinská, I.: The Role of Ontology in Building of Knowledge Systems for Industrial Applications. In: 4th Slovakian-Hungarian Joint Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence, Herlany, Slovakia (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ICT for Manufacturing, Report of Meeting with Group of Representatives of Five Expert Panels, Brussels (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ray, S., Jones, A.: Manufacturing interoperability. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 17(6), 681–688 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brunnermeier, S.B., Martin, S.A.: Interoperability Cost Analysis of the U.S. Automotive Supply Chain. National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S.A (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bussler, C., et al.: Context Mediation in the Semantic Web: Handling OWL Ontology and Data Disparity Through Context Interchange. In: Bussler, C.J., Tannen, V., Fundulaki, I. (eds.) SWDB 2004. LNCS, vol. 3372, pp. 140–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Uschold, M., Gruninger, M.: Ontologies and Semantics for Seamless Connectivity (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gruber, T.R.: Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies used for Knowledge Sharing, pp. 907–928. Academic Press, Inc., London (1995)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schlenoff, C., et al.: ISO-18629 The Process Specification Language (PSL): Overview and Version 1.0 Specification, NISTIR 6459. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Young, R.I.M., et al.: Manufacturing knowledge sharing in PLM: a progression towards the use of heavy weight ontologies. International Journal of Production Research 45(7), 1505–1519 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chungoora, N., Young, R.I.M.: The configuration of design and manufacture knowledge models from a heavyweight ontological foundation. International Journal of Production Research (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abramovici, M., Sieg, O.C.: Status and development trends of product lifecycle management systems. In: IPPD Conference, Wroclaw (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen, D., Doumeingts, G., Vernadat, F.: Architectures for enterprise integration and interoperability:Past, present and future. Computers in Industry 59, 647–659 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Borgo, S., Leitão, P.: Foundations for a core ontology of manufacturing, Bragança, Portugal (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, J.-H., Suh, H.-W.: Ontology-based Multi-layered Knowledge Framework for Product Lifecycle Management. Concurrent Engineering 16(4), 301–311 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhou, J., Dieng-Kuntz, R.: Manufacturing Ontology Analysis and Design: Towards Excellent Manufacturing. IEEEXplore, 39–45(2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leimagnan, S., et al.: MASON: A proposal for an ontology for manufacturing domain. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Distributed Intelligent Systems: Collective Intelligence and Its Applications (DIS 2006), IEEEXplore (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gunendran, A.: An Information and Knowledge Framework to Support Multiple Viewpoints in the Design for Manufacture of Injection Moulded Products, PhD Research Thesis, Loughborough University (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gunendran, G., Young, B.: Methods for the Capture of Manufacture Best Practice in Product Lifecycle Management. In: International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management 2008. Inderscince Publishers (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Usman, Z., et al.: A Manufacturing Foundation Ontology for Product Life Cycle Interoperability. In: Interoperability for Enterprise Software and Applications. Springer, Coventry (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zahid Usman
    • 1
  • Robert Ian Marr Young
    • 1
  • Nitishal Chungoora
    • 1
  • Claire Palmer
    • 1
  • Keith Case
    • 1
  • Jenny Harding
    • 1
  1. 1.Wolfson School of Mechanical & Manufacturing EngineeringLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations