On the Move to Business-Driven Alignment of Service Monitoring Requirements

  • Patrício de Alencar Silva
  • Hans Weigand
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 76)


Current service monitoring capabilities have been not designed in alignment with business needs. We argue that service monitoring should be primarily thought of as an economic concern, with proper needs being elicited on the business strategy level and further drilled down to process and IT services management layers. Monitoring needs and capabilities should be designed independently from each other and exposed as abstract monitoring interfaces for matchmaking. This allows for treating monitoring as a service, with more flexibility and adaptability to fulfill specific business needs.


Early Requirements Analysis Monitoring as a Service Value Models 


  1. 1.
    Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H.: Value based requirements engineering: Exploring innovative e-commerce idea. Requirements Eng. Journal 8(2), 114–134 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gordijn, J., Weigand, H., Reichert, M., Wieringa, R.: Towards self-configuration and management of e-service provisioning in dynamic value constellations. In: Proc. of SAC 2008, pp. 566–571 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parmenter, D.: Key Performance Indicators. Willey, Chichester (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hollingsworth, D.: Workflow Management Coalition (WfMC), The Workflow Reference Model, Document Number TC00-1003, Document Status - Issue 1.1 (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zur Mühlen, M.: Workflow-based Process Controlling. Foundation, Design, and Implementation of Workflow-driven Process Information Systems. In: Advances in Information Systems and Management Science, Logos, Berlin, vol. 6 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Küng, P., Hagen, C., Rodel, M., Seifert, S.: Business Process Monitoring & Measurement in a Large Bank: Challenges and Selected Approaches. In: Andersen, K.V., Debenham, J., Wagner, R. (eds.) DEXA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3588, pp. 955–961. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Srinivasan, S., Krishna, V., Holmes, S.: Web-Log-Driven Business Activity Monitoring. Computer 38(3), 61–68 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu, T., Jeng, J.-J.: Model Driven Development of Business Process Monitoring and Control Systems. In: Proc. ICEIS 2005, vol. 3, pp. 161–166 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greiner, T., Düster, W., Pouatcha, F., von Ammon, R., Brandl, H., Guschakowski, D.: Business activity monitoring of norisbank taking the example of the application easyCredit and the future adoption of Complex Event Processing (CEP). In: Proc. PPPJ 2006, vol. 178, pp. 237–242 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alles, M., Brennan, G., Kogan, A., Vasarhelyi, M.A.: Continuous Monitoring of Business Process Controls: A Pilot Implementation of a Continuous Auditing System at Siemens. Int. Jour. of Accounting Information Systems 7, 137–161 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abe, M., Jeng, J., Li, Y.: A Tool Framework for KPI Application Development. In: Proc. ICEBE 2007, pp. 22–29 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beeri, C., Eyal, A., Milo, T., Pilberg, A.: Monitoring business processes with queries. In: Proc. 33rd VLDB, pp. 603–614 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim, H., Lee, Y.-H., Yim, H., Cho, N.W.: Design and Implementation of a Personalized Business Activity Monitoring System. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4553, pp. 581–590. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen, P.: Goal-Oriented Business Process Monitoring: An Approach based on User Requirements Notation Combined with Business Intelligence and Web Services, M. Sc. Thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ferro, D.N., Hoogendoorn, M., Jonker, C.M.: Ontology-Based Business Activity Monitoring Agent. In: Proc. WIC 2008, pp. 491–495 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Strnadl, C.F.: Bridging Architectural Boundaries Design and Implementation of a Semantic BPM and SOA Governance Tool. In: Krämer, B.J., Lin, K.-J., Narasimhan, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4749, pp. 518–529. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pedrinaci, C., Lambert, D., Wetzstein, B., van Lessen, T., Cekov, L., Dimitrov, M.: SENTINEL: a semantic business process monitoring tool. In: Proc. OBI 2008, vol. 308, pp. 1–12 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paschke, A., Bichler, M.: Knowledge representation concepts for automated SLA management. Decis. Support Syst. 46(1), 187–205 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lamparter, S., Luckner, S., Mutschler, S.: Semi-Automated Management of Web Service Contracts. Int. Jour. of Service Sciences (IJSSci) 1(3/4) (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rimini, G., Roberti, P.: Business Process Monitoring: BT Italy case study. In: Mazzeo, A., Bellini, R., Motta, G. (eds.) IFIP Fed. for Inf. Processing: E-Government ICT Professionalism and Competences Service Science, vol. 280, pp. 227–234 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tsai, W.T., Zhou, X., Wei, X.: A Policy Enforcement Framework for Verification and Control of Service Collaboration. ISeB 6, 83–107 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Unger, T., Leymann, F., Mauchart, S., Scheibler, T.: Aggregation of Service Level Agreements in the Context of Business Processes. In: Proc. EDOC 2008, pp. 43–52 (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vaculin, R., Sycara, K.: Semantic Web Services Monitoring: An OWL-S Based Approach. In: Proc. HICSS 2008, p. 313 (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Comuzzi, M., Kotsokalis, C., Spanoudakis, G., Yahyapour, R.: Establishing and Monitoring SLAs in Complex Service Based Systems. In: Proc. ICWS 2009, pp. 783–790 (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bai, X., Liu, Y., Wang, L., Tsai, W., Zhong, P.: Model-Based Monitoring and Policy Enforcement of Services. In: Proc. SERVICES 2009, pp. 789–796 (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fugini, M., Siadat, H.: SLA Contract for Cross-Layer Monitoring and Adaptation. In: Ma, R., et al. (eds.) BPM 2009 International Workshops LNBIP, vol. 43, pp. 412–423 (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kang, B., Lee, S.K., Min, Y.-b., Kang, S.-H., Cho, N.W.: Real-time Process Quality Control for Business Activity Monitoring. In: ICCSA 2009, pp. 237–242 (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Momm, C., Gebhart, M., Abeck, S.: A Model-Driven Approach for Monitoring Business Performance in Web Service Compositions. In: Proc. ICIW 2009, pp. 343–350 (2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pourshahid, A., Amyot, D., Peyton, L., Ghanavati, S., Chen, P., Weiss, M., Forster, A.J.: Business process management with the user requirements notation. Electronic Commerce Research 9(4), 269–316 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Robinson, W.N., Purao, S.: Specifying and Monitoring Interactions and Commitments in Open Business Processes. IEEE Softw. 26(2), 72–79 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Spillner, J., Winkler, M., Reichert, S., Cardoso, J., Schill, A.: Distributed Contracting and Monitoring in the Internet of Services. In: Senivongse, T., Oliveira, R. (eds.) DAIS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5523, pp. 129–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang, Q., Shao, J., Deng, F., Liu, Y., Li, M., Han, J., Mei, H.: An Online Monitoring Approach for Web Service Requirements. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2(4), 338–351 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Han, K.H., Choi, S.H., Kang, J.G., Lee, G.: Performance-centric business activity monitoring framework for continuous process improvement. In: Zadeh, L.A., Kacprzyk, J., Mastorakis, N., Kuri-Morales, A., Borne, P., Kazovsky, L. (eds.) Proc. WSEAS 2010, Stevens Point, Wisconsin. Artificial Intelligence Series, pp. 40–45 (2010)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., Rubin, V., Verbeek, H.M.W., van Dongen, B.F., Kindler, E., Günther, C.W.: Process Mining: A Two-Step Approach to Balance Between Underfitting and Overfitting. In: SoSyM, vol. 9(1), pp. 87–111 (2010)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wetzstein, B., Strauch, S., Leymann, F.: Measuring Performance Metrics of WS-BPEL Service Compositions. In: Proc. ICNS 2009, pp. 49–56 (2009)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    IEEE Std 1471.: Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems (2000)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cormier, D., Aerts, W., Ledoux, M.J., Magnan, M.: Web-Based Disclosure about Value Creation Processes: A Monitoring Perspective. Abacus 46, 320–347 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dimitrako, T., Daskalopulu, A., Maibaum, T.: Evidence-based Electronic Contract Performance Monitoring. INFORMS Jour. Of Group Decision and Negotiation, Special Issue: forma Modeling of Electronic Commerce 11(6), 469–485 (2002)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ferraiolo, D.F., Kuhn, D.R.: Role Based Access Control. In: Proc. 15th National Computer Security Conference, pp. 554–563 (1992)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Neumann, G., Strembeck, M.: A Scenario-driven Role Engineering Process for Functional RBAC Roles. In: Proc. SACMAT 2002, pp. 33–42 (2002)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Weigand, H., Johannesson, P., Andersson, B., Bergholtz, M., Edirisuriya, A., Ilayperuma, T.: Strategic Analysis using Value Modeling: The c3value Approach. In: Proc. HICSS 2007, p. 175c (2007)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    European Parliament and Council. Common Rules for the Internal Market in Electricity. EU Directive 2004/54/EC in: Official Journal of the European Union, July 15 (2003)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    ESMA.: Annual Report on the Progress in Smart Metering 2009. Version 2.0. European Smart Metering Alliance (January 2010)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    NMa/DTe.: Electricity Metering Code: Conditions within the meaning of Section 31, subsection 1b of the Electricity Act 1998, Informal Translation. Office of Energy Regulation (part of the Netherlands Competition Authority) (September 4, 2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrício de Alencar Silva
    • 1
  • Hans Weigand
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information ManagementTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations