Accelerating Innovation and Decelerating Climate Change

  • Ramesha Chandrappa
  • Sushil Gupta
  • Umesh Chandra Kulshrestha


Since 1980s “sustainable development” has been the key phrase of environmental protection. 1987 Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development defines sustainable development as: Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. The common concern of society is determined within states by the constitution and the legislation within the state. The international community does not have constitution and central authority for enforcement. Common concern of humankind results from treaties, customary rules and non-binding principles. Innovation over the past decades was used to fulfil human demands which have now resulted in stress on climate. Energy security is an important issue facing Asian countries, which currently import more than one-third of all global oil supplies. During the period 1990–2004, the highest growth rate in energy was in Asia (Sims et al. 2007). During the period from 1990 to 2005, China’s CO2 emissions increased from 676 to 1,491 MtCO2/yr to befall 18.7% of global emissions (IEEJ 2005; BP 2006). The area with the lowest per-capita utilization has changed from Asian developing countries in 1972 to African countries today. Mitigating climate impacts requires significantly stepping up international efforts to dissipate existing technologies and develop new ones. Dissipating climate friendly technology requires capacity building and enhancing the ability of countries.


  1. BP, 2006: BP Statistical review of world energy, BP Oil Company Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  2. BP, 2010: BP Statistical Review of World Energy, BP Oil Company Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Chandler W, Schaeffer R, Dadi Z, Shukla P.R, Tudela F, Davidson O and Alpan-Atamer S, 2002: Climate change mitigation in developing countries: Brazil, China, India, Mexico, South Africa, and Turkey. Pew Center on Global Climate Change.Google Scholar
  4. Edmonds J, Wise M.A, Dooley J.J, Kim S.H, Smith S.J, Runci P.J, Clarke L.E, Malone E.L, and Stokes G.M: 2007: Global Energy Technology Strategy Addressing Climat e Change: Phase 2 Findings from an International Public-Private Sponsored Research Program. Washington, DC: Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories.Google Scholar
  5. Figueres C, Haites E, and Hoyt E. 2005: Programmatic CDM Project Activities: Eligibility, Methodological Requirements and Implementation. Washington, DC: World Bank Carbon Finance Business Unit.Google Scholar
  6. Gershinkova and Dinara, 2010: Northeast Asia International Conference for Economic Development in Nigata, Climate Policy and Measures in Russian Federation in “Kyoto” and “Post-Kyto” Periods.Google Scholar
  7. Government of India (GoI), 2008: National Action Plan on Climate change, Prime ministers council on climate change. downloaded on 14th July 2010. PP49
  8. GTSP, 2001: Addressing Climate Change: An initial report of an international public-private collaboration. Battelle Memorial Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  9. Ibrahim Abdel Gelil, 2009: Ghg Emissions - Mitigation Efforts In The Arab Countries, Report Of The Arab Forum For Environment And Development, Edited By Mostafa K. Tolba Najib W. SaabGoogle Scholar
  10. ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization), 2009: Emissions Reductions: United Arab Emirates Contribution, High-Level Meeting on International Aviation and Climate Change Montréal, 7 To 9 October 2009, Agenda Item 2: Proposals for Strategies And Measures To Achieve Emissions Reductions, Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  11. IEEJ, 2005: Handbook of energy & economic statistics in Japan. The Energy Data and Modelling Centre, Institute of Energy Economics, Japan.Google Scholar
  12. Meijer E. 2007: “The International Institutions of the Clean Development Mechanism Brought before National Courts: Limiting Jurisdictional Immunity to Achieve Access to Justice.” NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 39 (4): 873–928.Google Scholar
  13. Metcalfe S, and Ramlogan R, 2008: “Innovation Systems and the Competitive Process in Developing Economies.” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 48 (2): 433–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Michaelowa A and Pallav P. 2007: Additionality Determination of Indian CDM Projects. Can Indian CDM Project Developers Outwit the CDM Executive Board? Zurich: University of Zurich.Google Scholar
  15. Narain Sunita, 2010: A ‘just’ climate agreement: the framework for an effective global deal; Global Sustainability - A Nobel Cause, Edited By Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Mario Molina, Nicholas Stern, Veronika Huber, Susanne Kadner, 108–121Google Scholar
  16. Nussbaumer P, 2009: “On the Contribution of Labelled Certified Emission Reductions to Sustainable Development: A Multi-criteria Evaluation of CDM Projects.” Energy Policy 37 (1): 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Olsen K.H, 2007: “The Clean Development Mechanism’s Contribution to Sustainable Development: A Review of the Literature.” Climatic Change 84 (1): 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Olsen K.H and Fenhann J, 2008: “Sustainable Development Benefits of Clean Development Mechanism Projects. A New Methodology for Sustainability Assessment Based on Text Analysis of the Project Design Documents Submitted for Validation.” Energy Policy 36 (8): 2819–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. People’s Republic of China, China’s National Climate Change Programme, 2007: Prepared under the Auspices of National Development and Reform Commission, PP66Google Scholar
  20. RITE, 2003: New Earth 21 Project. Research Institute of Innovative Technologies for the Earth. Kyoto, JapanGoogle Scholar
  21. Schneider, L. 2007: Is the CDM Fulfilling Its Environmental and Sustainable Development Objective? An Evaluation of the CDM and Options for Improvement. Berlin: Institute for Applied Ecology.Google Scholar
  22. Sutter C, and Parreno J.C. 2007: “Does the Current Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Deliver Its Sustainable Development Claim? An Analysis of Officially Registered CDM Projects.” Climatic Change 84 (1): 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Streck C, and Chagas T.B. 2007: “The Future of the CDM in a Post-Kyoto World.” Carbon & Climate Law Review 1 (1): 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Streck C and Lin J, 2008: “Making Markets Work: A Review of CDM Performance and the Need for Reform.” European Journal of International Law 19 (2): 409–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sims R.E.H, Schock R.N, Adegbululgbe A, Fenhann J, Konstantinaviciute I, Moomaw W, Nimir H.B, Schlamadinger B, Torres-Martínez J, Turner C, Uchiyama Y, Vuori S.J.V, Wamukonya N, Zhang X, 2007: Energy supply. In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Metz B, Davidson O.R, Bosch P.R, Dave R, Meyer L.A (eds)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  26. Shahin W.R, 2005: NERC Presentation. CLASP Online. At: (Accessed 27 September, 2009).
  27. Singapore’s National Climate Strategy, 2008, PP44Google Scholar
  28. Stern N. 2007: The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wara M. 2007: “Is the Global Carbon Market Working?” Nature 445: 595–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wara M, and Victor D, 2008: “A Realistic Policy on International Carbon Markets.” Working Paper 74, Program on Energy and Sustainable Development, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ramesha Chandrappa
    • 1
  • Sushil Gupta
    • 2
  • Umesh Chandra Kulshrestha
    • 3
  1. 1.Biomedical Waste SectionKarnataka State Pollution Control BoardBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Risk Management Solutions IndiaNoidaIndia
  3. 3.School of Environmental SciencesJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DehliIndia

Personalised recommendations