Advertisement

Interpretation of Surface Features of Mars as a Function of Its Verbal—Toponymic—and Visual Representation

  • Henrik I. HargitaiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC, volume 5)

Abstract

Does the language of place names affect the interpretation of a planetary map? Is there any consistent change in the reading of a planetary map if the language of descriptor terms is changed from the official Latin to the mother language of the map reader? A survey made at a middle school in Hungary addressed these questions. The method was to collect preconceptions the landscape of Mars, then to show maps in Latin and Hungarian, and again ask the same questions. The results show that there are considerable differences in the two groups.

Keywords

Descriptor Term Planetary Surface Brute Fact Planetary Body International Astronomical Union 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Greeley R, Batson RM (2007) Planetary mapping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Hargitai HI (2006) Planetary maps: visualization and nomenclature. Cartographica 41(2):149–164. doi: 10.3138/9862-21JU-4021-72M3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hargitai H (ed) (2008a) Topographic map of Mars, Lambert projection. http://planetologia.elte.hu/1cikkeke.phtml?cim=planterkepeke.html. Accessed 15 July 2011, KAVÜCS, Budapest
  4. Hargitai H (2008b) Csillagászati ismeretek és téveszmék óvodás kortól idős korig, [Astronomical facts and fallacies from pre-schoolers to elderly people, in Hungarian]. Új Pedagógiai Szemle 58:122–148Google Scholar
  5. Hargitai H, Kereszturi A (2002) Javaslat magyar bolygótudományi szaknyelvi norma létrehozására [Suggestions for a Hungarian language standardized planetary nomenclature and terminology, in Hungarian]. Geodézia és Kartográfia 2002:26–32Google Scholar
  6. Hargitai H, Kereszturi Á (2010) Towards the development of supplements to the gazetteer of planetary nomenclature. In: Proceedings of EPSC2010-865. European planetary science congress 2010, Rome, 19–24 Sept 2010Google Scholar
  7. Hargitai H, Császár G, BércziSz KÁ (2008) Földön kívüli égitestek geológiai és rétegtani tagolása és nevezéktana [Geological and stratigraphical units and the nomenclature of extraterrestrial planetary bodies, in Hungarian]. Földtani Közlöny 138:323–338Google Scholar
  8. Hargitai H, Kozma J, Kereszturi Á, Sz B, Dutkó A, Illés E, Karátson D, Sik A (2010) Javaslat a planetológiai nevezéktan magyar rendszerére. [Suggestions for a Hungarian language system of planetary nomenclature Hungarian]. In: Meteor Csillagászati Évkönyv [Meteor Astronomical yearbook]. MCSE, Budapest, pp 280–302Google Scholar
  9. IAU (1970) Transactions of the International Astronomical Union, in Menzel, D.H., Minnaert, M., Levin, Boris, and Dollfus, Audouin, 1971, report on lunar nomenclature. Space Sci Rev 12:136–186Google Scholar
  10. Ingarden R (1974) The literary work of art. Northwestern University Press, EvanstonGoogle Scholar
  11. IPCD 2011: international planetary cartography database. ICA commission on planetary cartography//Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest. http://planetologia.elte.hu/ipcd/. Accessed 15 July 2011
  12. Jordan P (2010) The endonym—name from within a social group. In: Proceedings of trends in exonym use proceedings of the 10th UNGEGN working group on exonyms meeting, Tainach, 28–30 Apr 2010Google Scholar
  13. Jordan P (2011) Trends of exonym use in European school atlases. In: Proceedings of international cartographic conference, Paris, No. CO-376, 7 July 2011Google Scholar
  14. Kadmon N (2000) Toponymy: the lore, laws and language of geographical names. Vantage Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Kereszturi Á (2009) Visualization in the education of astrobiology. In: Hegedűs S, Csonka J (eds) Astrobiology: physical origin, biological evolution and spatial distribution. Nova Publishers, New York, pp 131–141Google Scholar
  16. Krygier JB (1995) Cartography as an art and a science? Cartogr J 32:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuiper GP (1944) Titan: a satellite with an atmosphere. Astrophys J 100:378–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lazarev E, Rodionova J (2011) Venus mapping at small scale: source data processing and cartographic interpretation. In: Ruas A (ed), Advances in cartography and GIScience. doi  10.1007/978-3-642-19214-2_17
  19. Lowell P (1908) Mars as the abode of life. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Maciej Z (2010) Polish geographical names of undersea and Antarctic features. The names which “escape” the definitions of exonym and endonym. In: Trends in exonym use proceedings of the 10th UNGEGN working group on exonyms meeting, Tainach, 28–30 Apr 2010Google Scholar
  21. Nass A, van Gasselt S, Jaumann R, Asche H (2010) Implementation of cartographic symbols for planetary mapping in geographic information systems. Planet Space Sci 59:1255. doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2010.08.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ong WJ (1982/2002) Orality and literacy: the technologizing of the word. Routledge, London/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sagan C, Fox P (1975) The canals of mars: an assessment after mariner 9. Icarus 25:602–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Searle J (1997) The construction of social reality. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Shingareva KB, Zimbelman J, Buchroithner MF, Hargitai HI (2005) The realization of ICA commission projects on planetary cartography. Cartographica 40:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. UN (1966) UN 2222 (XXI). Treaty on principles governing the activities of states in the exploration and use of outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies. http://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/SpaceLaw/gares/html/gares_21_2222.html Accessed 15 July 2011
  27. UN (2002) Glossary of terms for the standardization of geographical names: United Nations group of experts on geographical names. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Statistics Division, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. UN (2006) Manual for the national standardization of geographical names: United Nations group of experts on geographical names. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs Statistics Division, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. USGS (2011) Gazetteer of planetary nomenclature. International astronomical union working group for planetary system nomenclature. http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/Page/Rules Accessed 15 July 2011
  30. Whitaker EA (1999) Mapping and naming the moon: a history of lunar cartography and nomenclature. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Wittgenstein L (1922) Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Routledge and Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical GeographyEötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations