Advertisement

The Role of Output Devices in the Higher Education Courses of Cartography

  • László ZentaiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC, volume 5)

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology affected cartography considerably in the last three to four decades of the twentieth century. In higher education curriculums the reproduction process was thought as a totally independent subject or a part of other related subjects. Cartographers should know the whole technical process to be sure that the maps will be reproduced as they were planned. As digital output devices become wide-spread and higher education institutes could afford these devices in the first phase the course about map reproduction was complemented by digital methods and the necessary theoretical information about the process was also added. In the second phase when the output device becomes easily available for even home users the traditional offset printing method has seemingly lost its importance and students were more interesting in digital printing methods. Nowadays one of the most important output devices in cartography is the screen of the computer, mobile phone, PDA which again made us to make changes in the curriculum and emphasize the importance of these new “output devices”.

Keywords

Global Satellite Navigation System Printing Process Output Device Printing Method Color Printing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

The European Union and the European Social Fund have provided financial support to the project under the grant agreement no. TÁMOP 4.2.1./B-09/KMR-2010-0003.

References

  1. Harris R (1987) Satellite remote sensing. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Latimer HC (1977) Preparing art and camera copy for printing: contemporary procedures and techniques for mechanicals and related copy. McGraw-Hill, New WorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Longley P (2005) Geographic information systems and science. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. McMaster R, McMaster S (2002) A history of twentieth-century American academic cartography. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 29:305–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ormeling FJ (1988) ICA 1959–1984. The first twenty-five years of the International Cartographic Association. Elsevier Science, EnschedeGoogle Scholar
  6. Salichtchev KA (1979) Periodical and serial publications on cartography. Can Cartogr 16:109–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Zable JL, Lee HC (1997) An overview of impact printing. IBM J Res Dev 41:651–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Zentai L (2009) Change of the meaning of the term ‘cartographer’ in the last decades. In: XXIV international cartographic conference, Santiago de Chile, 15–22 Nov 2009. ICAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cartography and GeoinformaticsEötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations