Advertisement

Implications of Communication Constraints for the DLRP in Transport Logistics

  • Bernd-Ludwig Wenning
  • Christian Zabel
  • Henning Rekersbrink
  • Carmelita Görg
  • Bernd Scholz-Reiter
Chapter

Abstract

Autonomous control of logistic objects such as vehicles and goods in transport processes means that such objects act independently to find their best way through a logistic network. In order to make reasonable decisions, they have to interact with other objects, e.g. to determine the availability of transport demand or free transport capacity along a possible route. Interaction means the use of information and communication infrastructure, for example by using the Distributed Logistic Routing Protocol (DLRP) that was developed for this purpose. The physical infrastructure, however, has direct technical constraints such as limited communication bandwidth or storage capacity and indirect constraints that are caused, for example, by the communication costs. This article discusses some of these constraints and their implications for the implementation and operation of DLRP in transport logistic processes.

Keywords

Route Discovery Logistic Network Message Size Route Request Logistic Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Johnson D, Maltz D (1996) Dynamic source routing in ad-hoc wireless networks. In: Imielinski T, Korth H (eds) Mobile computing, pp 153–181Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perkins C, Belding-Royer E, Das S (2003) Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing. IETF RFC 3561Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scholz-Reiter B, Windt K, Freitag M (2004) Autonomous logistic processes – new demands and first approaches. In: Proceedings of the 37th CIRP international seminar on manufacturing systems, pp 357–362Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scholz-Reiter B, Rekersbrink H, Freitag M (2006) Internet routing protocols as an autonomous control approach for transport networks. In: Proceedings of the 5th CIRP international seminar on intelligent computation in manufacturing engineering, pp 341–345Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wenning B-L, Rekersbrink H, Görg C (2009) Scalability investigations on communication traffic in distributed routing of autonomous logistic objects. In: 9th International conference on ITS telecommunication, Lille, France, pp 8–12Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wenning B-L, Rekersbrink H, Timm-Giel A, Görg C (2009) Weighted multiplicative decision function for distributed routing in transport logistics. In: 2nd International conference for dynamics in logistics (LDIC 2009), pp 117–124Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wenning B-L, Rekersbrink H, Timm-Giel A, Görg C, Scholz-Reiter B (2007) Autonomous control by means of distributed routing. In: Hülsmann M, Windt K (eds) Understanding autonomous cooperation and control in logistics – the impact on management, information and communication and material flow. Springer, pp 325–335Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wenning B-L (2010) Context-based routing in dynamic networks (dissertation). In: Advanced studies mobile research center Bremen. Vieweg + TeubnerCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernd-Ludwig Wenning
    • 1
  • Christian Zabel
    • 2
  • Henning Rekersbrink
    • 2
  • Carmelita Görg
    • 1
  • Bernd Scholz-Reiter
    • 1
  1. 1.Communication NetworksUniversity of BremenBremenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Planning and Control of Production Systems, BIBAUniversity of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations