Advertisement

Comparative In Vivo Wear Measurement of Conventional and Modern Bearing Surfaces in Total Hip Replacements by the Use of POLYWARE® Computerized System

  • Georgios KarydakisEmail author
  • Theofilos Karachalios
Chapter

Abstract

Mid-term results of a prospective randomized trial evaluating in vivo wear rates of ceramic on PE and Oxinium on PE bearing couplings in total hip replacement are presented. For the needs of the study the polyware software was used. All bearing surfaces showed a high wear rate of a varying degree up to the second postoperative year (bending in effect). Oxinium on cross-linked PE showed the lowest wear rate which reflects a satisfactory in vivo behavior. The ceramic on conventional PE coupling showed satisfactory and comparable to historical controls wear rates. Surprisingly, the ceramic on the specific cross linked PE used showed the worst wear rates. Long-term data is needed until definite conclusions can be made and no cost-effectiveness data supporting the use of Oxinium on cross-linked PEs bearing coupling exist.

Keywords

Femoral Head Wear Rate Bearing Surface Linear Wear Ultra High Molecular Weight 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1.  1.
    Mai, K., Verioti, M.K.C., Ezzet, K.A., Copp, S.N., Walker, R.H., Colwell Jr., C.W.: Incidence of ‘squeaking’ after ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 468, 413–417 (2010)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2.  2.
    Ritter, M.A., Albohm, M.J., Keating, E.M., Faris, P.M., Meding, J.B.: Comparative outcomes of total joint arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 10, 737–741 (1995)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3.  3.
    Walter, A.: On the material and the tribology of alumina-alumina couplings for hip joint prostheses. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 282, 31–46 (1992)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4.  4.
    Kwon, Y.M., Ostlere, S.J., McLardy-Smith, P., Athanasou, N.A., Gill, H.S., Murray, D.W.: Asymptomatic pseudotumors after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty prevalence and metal ion study. J. Arthroplasty (2010) [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  5.  5.
    Ladon, D., Doherty, A., Newson, R., Turner, J., Bhamra, M., Case, C.P.: Changes in metal levels and chromosome aberrations in the peripheral blood of patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 19(8 Suppl 3), 78–83 (2004)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6.  6.
    Jasty, M.J., Floyd, W.E., Schiller, A.L., Goldring, S.R., Harris, W.H.: Localized osteolysis in stable, non-septic total hip replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 68, 912–919 (1986)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7.  7.
    Willert, H., Bertram, H., Buchhorn, G.: Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip: the role of bone cement fragmentation. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 258, 108–121 (1990)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8.  8.
    Willert, H., Bertram, H., Buchhorn, G.: Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip: the role of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 258, 95–107 (1990)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9.  9.
    Willert, H.G., Semlitsch, M.: Tissue reactions to plastic and metallic wear products of joint endoprostheses. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 333, 4–14 (1996)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Santavirta, S., Boehler, M., Harris, W.H., Konttinen, Y.T., Lappalainen, R., Muratoglu, O., Rieker, C., Salzer, M.: Alternative materials to improve total hip replacement tribology. Acta Orthop. Scand. 74, 380–388 (2003)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Urban, J.A., Garvin, K.L., Boese, C.K., Bryson, K., Pedersen, D.R., Callaghan, J.J., Miller, R.K.: Ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty: seventeen to twenty-one-year results. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 83, 1688–1694 (2001)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Muratoglu, O.K., Greenbaum, E.S., Bragdon, C.R., Jasty, M., Freiberg, A.A., Harris, W.H.: Surface analysis of early retrieved acetabular polyethylene liners: a comparison of conventional and highly crosslinked polyethylenes. J. Arthroplasty 19, 68–77 (2004)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Muratoglu, O.K., Merrill, E.W., Bragdon, C.R., O’Connor, D., Hoeffel, D., Burroughs, B., Jasty, M., Harris, W.H.: Effect of radiation, heat, and aging on in vitro wear resistance of polyethylene. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 417, 253–262 (2003)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beksac, B., Salas, A., Della Valle, A.G., Salvati, E.: Wear is reduced in THA performed with highly cross-linked polyethylene. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 467, 1765–1772 (2009)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Glyn-Jones, S., Isaac, S., Hauptfleisch, J., McLardy-Smith, P., Murray, D.W., Gill, H.S.: Does highly cross-linked polyethylene wear less than conventional polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty? A double blind, randomized, and controlled trial using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J. Arthroplasty 23, 337–343 (2008)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Manning, D.W., Chiang, P.P., Martell, J.M., Galante, J.O., Harris, W.H.: In vivo comparative wear study of traditional and highly crosslinked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 20, 880–886 (2005)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karachalios, T., Hartofilakidis, G., Zacharakis, N., Tsekoura, M.: A 12- to 18-year radiographic follow-up study of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 296, 140–147 (1993)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Livermore, J., Ilstrup, D., Morrey, B.: Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 72A, 518–528 (1990)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ebramzadeh, E., Sangiorgio, S.N., Lattuada, F., Kang, J.S., Chiesa, R., McKellop, H.A., Dorr, L.D.: Accuracy of measurement of polyethylene wear with use of radiographs of total hip replacements. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 85A, 2378–2384 (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martell, J.M., Berdia, S.: Determination of polyethylene wear in total hip replacements with use of digital radiographs. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 79A, 1635–1641 (1997)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martell, J.: Clinical wear assessment. In: Callaghan, J., Rosenberg, A., Rubash, H. (eds.) The Adult Hip, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Devane, P.A., Horne, J.G.: Assessment of polyethylene wear in total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 369, 59–72 (1999)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Benezra, V., Mangin, S., Treska, M., et al.: Microstructural investigation of the oxide scale on Zr-2.5 Nb and its interface with the alloy substrate. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 550, 337–342 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Allain, J., Roudot-Thorval, F., Delecrin, J., Anract, P., Migaud, H., Goutallier, D.: Revision total hip arthroplasty performed after fracture of a ceramic femoral head: a multicenter survivorship study. J. Bone Joint Surg. 85A, 825–830 (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hasegawa, M., Sudo, A., Uchida, A.: Cobalt-chromium head wear following revision hip arthroplasty performed after ceramic fracture – a case report. Acta Orthop. 77, 833–835 (2006)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Garvin, K.L., Hartman, C.W., Mangla, J., Murdoch, N., Martell, J.M.: Wear analysis in THA utilizing oxidized zirconium and crosslinked polyethylene. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 467(1), 141–145 (2009)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mutimer, J., Devane, P.A., Adams, K., Horne, J.G.: Highly crosslinked polyethylene reduces wear in total hip arthroplasty at 5 years. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 468, 3228–3233 (2010)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nakahara, I., Nakamura, N., Nishii, T., Miki, H., Sakai, T., Sugano, N.: Minimum five-year follow-up wear measurement of Longevity highly cross-linked polyethylene cup against cobalt-chromium or zirconia heads. J. Arthroplasty 8, 1182–1187 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Good, V., Ries, M., Barrack, R.L., Widding, K., Hunter, G., Heuer, D.: Reduced wear with oxidized zirconium femoral heads. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 85(Suppl 4), 105–110 (2003)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Burroughs, B.R., Hallstrom, B., Golladay, G.J., Hoeffel, D., Harris, W.H.: Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes: an in vitro study. J. Arthroplasty 20(1), 11–19 (2005)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Amlie, E., Høvik, Ø., Reikerås, O.: Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty with 28 and 32-mm femoral head. J. Orthop. Traumatol. 11(2), 111–115 (2010)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Borlin, N., Thien, T., Karrholm, J.: The precision of radiostereometric measurements. Manual vs. digital measurements. J. Biomech. 35, 69–79 (2002)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Devane, P.A., Bourne, R.B., Rorabeck, C.H., Hardie, R.M., Horne, J.G.: Measurement of polyethylene wear in metal-backed acetabular cups. I. Three-dimensional technique. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 319, 303–316 (1995)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rissanen, P., Aro, S., Sla¨tis, P., Sintonen, H., Paavolainen, P.: Health and quality of life before and after hip or knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 10, 169–175 (1995)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Orthopaedic Department251 Hellenic Airforce General HospitalAthensHellenic Republic
  2. 2.Orthopaedic Department, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health SciencesUniversity of ThessaliaLarissaHellenic Republic

Personalised recommendations