Skip to main content

Article 10. Authentication of the text

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

Abstract

International negotiations may sometimes be conducted under time pressure and/or in several languages. It is therefore important for all negotiating States to be sure of the final outcome of the negotiations. While Art 9 settles the procedure on how to adopt the final text, Art 10 deals with its authentication as a distinct element in the treaty-making process. Both adoption and authentication may occur at the same time, but not necessarily so. For example, signature or initialling of a text may be deemed both adoption and authentication in a bilateral context, whereas separate acts may be needed in a multilateral context. Moreover, a treaty may be adopted only in one language, but authenticated in several languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Final Draft, Commentary to Art 9, 195 para 2.

  2. 2.

    UNGA Res 2106 (XX), 20 December 1965, UN Doc A/6014 para 1.

  3. 3.

    (1935) 29 AJIL Supp 657 et seq.

  4. 4.

    S Bastid Les traités dans la vie internationale – conclusion et effets (1985) 38.

  5. 5.

    Waldock I 42 et seq.

  6. 6.

    [1962-II] YbILC 161–180.

  7. 7.

    The United States questioned whether the article is necessary [1966-II] YbILC 347; Sweden found that it gave more procedural advice than stating a rule of law [1966-II] YbILC 337; and Japan submitted that it should be omitted [1966-II] YbILC 302.

  8. 8.

    Waldock IV 26.

  9. 9.

    [1965-I] YbILC 256 para 103.

  10. 10.

    [1966-I/2] YbILC 292, 326.

  11. 11.

    Final Draft, Commentary to Art 9, 195 para 1.

  12. 12.

    J-M Thouvenin in Corten/Klein Art 10 MN 8.

  13. 13.

    Villiger Art 10 MN 8.

  14. 14.

    Final Draft, Commentary to Art 9, 195 para 4.

  15. 15.

    WM Reisman/MH Arsanjani What Is the Current Value of Signing a Treaty? in S Breitenmoser et al. (eds) Festschrift Wildhaber (2007) 1491, 1495–1496, noting that the adoption of conventions by the UN General Assembly has substituted signing as a means of authentication at UN level.

  16. 16.

    Aust 90.

  17. 17.

    For more details on the negotiating history of this treaty, see F Hoffmeister Die Beziehungen der Europäischen Union zu den Staaten des Westbalkans in S Kadelbach (ed) Die Außenbeziehungen der Europäischen Union (2006) 132–138.

  18. 18.

    The treaty is annexed to the decision of the EU Council of 29 May 2006 on the conclusion by the EC of the Energy Community Treaty [2006] OJ L 198/15.

  19. 19.

    Bastid (n 4) 60–61.

Selected Bibliography

  • S Bastid Les traités dans la vie internationale – conclusion et effets (1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Dörr LL.M. (Lond.) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dörr, O., Schmalenbach, K. (2012). Article 10. Authentication of the text. In: Dörr, O., Schmalenbach, K. (eds) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19291-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics