Skip to main content

Article 8. Subsequent confirmation of an act performed without authorization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 5705 Accesses

Abstract

Art 8 deals with the legal consequences of an act performed by an unauthorized person related to the conclusion of a treaty and the options for the State concerned. It thereby complements the previous article on full powers and aims to bring about legal security in such situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sinclair 31.

  2. 2.

    H Blix Treaty-Making Power (1960) 12.

  3. 3.

    Final Draft, Commentary to Art 7, 211 para 2.

  4. 4.

    Waldock II 46.

  5. 5.

    [1963-II] YbILC 189–217.

  6. 6.

    Final Draft, Draft Art 7, 193.

  7. 7.

    UNCLOT I 79 para 34.

  8. 8.

    N Angelet/T Leidgens in Corten/Klein Art 8 MN 6–7; Villiger Art 8 MN 9.

  9. 9.

    Elias 21.

  10. 10.

    Final Draft, Commentary to Art 8, 194 para 2. For more background on this incident, see Blix (n 1) 76–77.

  11. 11.

    ICJ Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v Yugoslavia) (Preliminary Objections) (dissenting opinion Kreća) [1996] ICJ Rep 658, paras 38–39.

  12. 12.

    ICJ Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v Yugoslavia) (Preliminary Objections) [1996] ICJ Rep 595, para 44.

  13. 13.

    N Angelet/T Leidgens in Corten/Klein Art 8 MN 7.

  14. 14.

    Final Draft, Commentary to Art 8, 194 para 1.

  15. 15.

    Ibid para 3.

  16. 16.

    N Angelet/T Leidgens in Corten/Klein Art 8 MN 11.

  17. 17.

    For a different view, see N Angelet/T Leidgens in Corten/Klein Art 8 MN 6, 13–14, who argue that Art 8 only allows for retroactive confirmation, whereas a confirmation ex nunc would have to be based on customary law.

  18. 18.

    Final Draft, Commentary to Art 8, 194 para 3; GE do Nascimento e Silva Full Powers (1995) 2 EPIL 494, 496.

  19. 19.

    The treaty is reproduced in (1941) 35 AJIL Supp 129 and (1942) 11 ZaöRV 107–112.

  20. 20.

    For more details, see H Briggs The Validity of the Greenland Agreement (1941) 35 AJIL 508, and WG Grewe Der Grönland-‘Vertrag’ von Washington (1941) 8 Monatshefte für auswärtige Politik 431.

  21. 21.

    Blix (n 1) 60.

  22. 22.

    Aust 83; Blix (n 1) 9.

  23. 23.

    Blix (n 1) 9.

Selected Bibliography

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Dörr LL.M. (Lond.) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dörr, O., Schmalenbach, K. (2012). Article 8. Subsequent confirmation of an act performed without authorization. In: Dörr, O., Schmalenbach, K. (eds) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19291-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics