Advertisement

Integrated Climate Governance (ICG) and Sustainable Development

  • J. David TàbaraEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The present paper introduces for the first time the concept of Integrated Climate Governance (ICG) and critically discusses its implications for EU research and policy on ‘sustainable development’. ICG is understood as a transition-oriented appraisal approach focused on the creation of assessment tools, policy instruments, and agent-based capacities aimed at dealing in an integrated way with multiple scales and domains related both with mitigation and adaptation. The goal of ICG is to support agent transformation for sustainable development. ICG constitutes both a descriptive and normative synthesis of a large corpus of literature and research within the fields of Integrated Assessment (IA), Integrated Sustainability Assessment (ISA; Rotmans et al. 2008), Social and Sustainability Learning (Pahl-Wostl et al. 2008), and research on the institutional dimensions of global environmental change (Young 2008).

Keywords

Climate Policy Policy Instrument Climate Risk Policy Domain Climate Mitigation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper and reflection could have never been made without the inspiration and intensive years of EU research with Alex Haxeltine, Jill Jager, Carlo Jaeger, Claudia Pahl-Wostl, Jan Rotmans, and Paul Weaver. I am also grateful to the reviewers of an earlier version of the paper and to the colleagues and researchers of the MATISSE and ADAM projects. Responsibility for any possible bias or flaws in the arguments presented is only mine.

References

  1. Jaeger, C. C., Schellnhuber, J. H., & Brovkin, V. (2008). Stern’s review and Adam’s Fallacy. Climatic Change, 89, 2007–2218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Jäger, J., & Farell, A. E. (2006). Improving the practice of environmental assessment. In A. E. Farrell & J. Jäger (Eds.), Assessments of global and regional environmental risks. Designing processes for the effective use of science in policy making (pp. 278–293). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  3. Jordan, A. (2008). The governance of sustainable development: Taking stock and looking forwards. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Mitchel, R. B., Clark, W. C., & Cash, D. W. (2006). Information and influence. In R. B. Mitchel, W. C. Clark, D. W. Cash, & N. M. Dickson (Eds.), Global environmental assessments. Information and influence (pp. 307–338). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Pahl-Wostl, C., Mostert, E., & Tàbara, J. D. (2008). Special issue on social learning in water resource management. Ecology and Society, 13(1), 24. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art24/.
  6. Rotmans, J., Jager, J., & Weaver, P. (2008). Special issue on integrated sustainability assessment. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Innovation, 3(1/2), 1–162.Google Scholar
  7. Tàbara, J. D. (2010). Integrated climate governance in regions? Assessing Catalonia’s performance using the ‘climate learning ladder’. Regional Environmental Change. doi: 10.1007/s10113-010-0135-3.Google Scholar
  8. Tàbara, J. D., & Palh-Wostl, C. (2008). Sustainability learning in natural resource use and management. Ecology and Society, 12(2), 3. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/viewissue.php?sf=28.
  9. Tàbara, J. D., Dai, X., Jia, G., McEvoy, D., Neufeldt, H., Serra, A., et al. (2010). The climate learning ladder. A pragmatic procedure to support climate adaptation. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Weaver, P. M., Haxeltine, A., van de Kerkhof, M., & Tàbara, J. D. (2006). Mainstreaming action on climate change through participatory appraisal. International Journal on Innovation and Sustainable Development, 1(3), 238–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Young, O. (2008). Building regimes for socioecological systems: Institutional diagnosis. In O. R. Young, L. A. King, & H. Schroeder (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change. Principal findings, applications, and research frontiers. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and European Union 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Environmental Science and TechnologyAutonomous University of Barcelona, Campus UAB.BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations