Abstract
Showing how to carry out the second and third steps of the Viplan Method is the purpose of this chapter. We assume that the organization in focus can be described in terms of a transformation process needed to produce the products or services implied by its ascribed name. Our concern now is finding the activities, and their relations, that are necessary to carry out this transformation process. These activities (and their relations) can be described or designed by using technological models. Each activity is a chunk of complexity including highly interconnected sub-activities. Together they offer a strategy to manage the complexity of the organization’s value adding transformation. But not only technology drives the way in which an organization chunks its complexity. The organization may have to take into consideration the localization of its activities; does it matter whether they are close or distant to their markets? Does it matter to differentiate between customer and product segments? How do time factors influence the structure of their technological activities? These are all complexity drivers for grouping their activities. Producing these technological and structural models is the second step of Viplan. The third step is studying the organization’s unfolding of complexity. This activity is at the core of working out an organization’s recursive structure. This chapter offers a discussion, supported by a wide range of examples, of the convenience and necessity of enabling autonomy or primary activities within the organization. This study is driven by the technological and structural models. This chapter debates the organization’s strategy to manage the complexity implied by its stated name.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This exercise was developed by students of a postgraduate course run at the Universidad de los Andes in Colombia.
- 2.
This unfolding of complexity was worked out by managers of this company during a master course on organizational cybernetics undertaken by them at the Universidad de los Andes in Colombia.
- 3.
This is an elaboration of an example in Espejo and Bowling (1996).
References
Ackoff R (1978) The art of problem solving. Wiley, Chichester
Banker RD, Bardhan IR, Chang H, Lin S (2006) Plant information systems, manufacturing capabilities and plant performance. MIS Quart 30(2):225–246
Beer S (1979) The heart of enterprise. Wiley, Chichester
Bowling D, Espejo R (2000) Exploring computer supported cooperative work in a retail bank’. In: Allen J, Wilby J (eds) ISSS 2000 Intenational Society for the Systems Sciences. ISSS, Toronto
Conant R, Ashby R (1970) Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. Int J Syst Sci 1(2):89–97
Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg Manage J 21(21):1105–1122
Espejo R (2000) Giving requisite variety to strategic and implementation processes: theory and practice. International symposium on knowledge and systems sciences: challenges to complexity. Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Ishikawa, pp 34–42
Espejo R, Bowling D (1996) Viplan learning system: a method to learn the viable system model. Syncho, Ltd., Birmingham, www.syncho.com
Homer-Dixon T (2001) The ingenuity gap: how can we solve the problem of the future. Vintage, London
Pickering A (2010) The cybernetic brain. University of Chicago Press, London
Teece JD (2008) Technological know-how, organizational capabilities, and strategic management: business strategy and enterprise development in competitive environments. World Scientific Publishing, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Espejo, R., Reyes, A. (2011). Unfolding of Complexity: Modelling the Transformation’s Complexity. In: Organizational Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19109-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19109-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19108-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19109-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)